On Monday, 9 March 2020 at 19:10:54 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
https://wiki.dlang.org/DIP24
Hi , Timon Gehr
Thanks for the reply, very good DIPS.
I think this is very basic work, why the core team not take care
it for such a long time.
On 09.03.20 13:14, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
Here's a wiki page referencing one of the 2013 discussions
https://wiki.dlang.org/Property_Discussion_Wrap-up
https://wiki.dlang.org/DIP24
On Monday, 9 March 2020 at 12:14:06 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
Here's a wiki page referencing one of the 2013 discussions
https://wiki.dlang.org/Property_Discussion_Wrap-up
though i'll note the thing is older than that.
What especially drove me nuts is people would so often say
"property *synt
On Monday, 9 March 2020 at 12:14:06 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Monday, 9 March 2020 at 10:09:56 UTC, Calvin P wrote:
@property exists so many years, Druntime & Phobos use it
2280 times. I can't believe it is not recommended.
They never implemented it right. This opCall type thing was THE
On Monday, 9 March 2020 at 10:09:56 UTC, Calvin P wrote:
@property exists so many years, Druntime & Phobos use it
2280 times. I can't believe it is not recommended.
They never implemented it right. This opCall type thing was THE
case we brought up to introduce @property in the first place..
On Monday, 9 March 2020 at 09:44:40 UTC, Simen Kjærås wrote:
As written on
https://dlang.org/spec/function.html#property-functions:
WARNING: The definition and usefulness of property functions
is being reviewed, and the implementation is currently
incomplete. Using property functions is not r
On Monday, 9 March 2020 at 09:25:31 UTC, Calvin P wrote:
Is this a bugs ?
==
struct A {
ref auto opCall(string tmp) scope return {
return this;
}
}
struct B {
A _a;
@property ref auto a() scope return {
return _a;
