On 8/22/18 11:37 AM, Alex wrote:
On Wednesday, 22 August 2018 at 15:18:29 UTC, XavierAP wrote:
On Wednesday, 22 August 2018 at 14:48:57 UTC, Alex wrote:
Because it could be meant as the argument to some templates to the
left. Like
(foo!bar)!x
Sure, it would be a coincidence, if both will wo
On Wednesday, 22 August 2018 at 15:18:29 UTC, XavierAP wrote:
On Wednesday, 22 August 2018 at 14:48:57 UTC, Alex wrote:
Because it could be meant as the argument to some templates to
the left. Like
(foo!bar)!x
Sure, it would be a coincidence, if both will work. However,
templates are not so
On Wednesday, 22 August 2018 at 14:48:57 UTC, Alex wrote:
Because it could be meant as the argument to some templates to
the left. Like
(foo!bar)!x
Sure, it would be a coincidence, if both will work. However,
templates are not something where you can simply imply the
associative property, I
On Wednesday, 22 August 2018 at 14:30:39 UTC, XavierAP wrote:
Why
foo!bar!x
is not understood as
foo!(bar!x)
but instead gives an error "multiple ! arguments are not
allowed"?
Precisely because multiple "!" can never belong to the same
instantiation, why does the parser not
Why
foo!bar!x
is not understood as
foo!(bar!x)
but instead gives an error "multiple ! arguments are not allowed"?
Precisely because multiple "!" can never belong to the same
instantiation, why does the parser not understand without needing
brackets that the rightmost template
