Thanks for checking. Looks like it works with DMD, LDC, and older
GDC, so this could be a GDC regression. I'll try to post it in
GDC (GCC) Bugzilla if I can get an account there.
On Wednesday, 5 March 2025 at 16:58:18 UTC, Kirill Kryukov wrote:
Is this a bug, or am I misunderstanding something?
Compiled with "gdc -Og -o repro repro.d", using gdc (GCC)
14.2.1 20240912 (Red Hat 14.2.1-3), on Linux.
Compiled your code with DMD v2.109.1, gdc (GCC) 11.3.0 and gdc
(GCC) 12
On Wednesday, 5 March 2025 at 16:58:18 UTC, Kirill Kryukov wrote:
Hi all,
I was debugging an old project that started crashing after
upgrading to a recent toolchain. I noticed that commenting out
invariants helps. I reduced it to the following:
[...]
Is this a bug, or am I misunderstanding
On Wednesday, 5 March 2025 at 16:58:18 UTC, Kirill Kryukov wrote:
Hi all,
Is this a bug, or am I misunderstanding something?
Compiled with "gdc -Og -o repro repro.d", using gdc (GCC)
14.2.1 20240912 (Red Hat 14.2.1-3), on Linux.
Thanks.
It seems working with dmd and ldc.
Maybe GDC specific
Hi all,
I was debugging an old project that started crashing after
upgrading to a recent toolchain. I noticed that commenting out
invariants helps. I reduced it to the following:
```
import std.conv: to;
struct A
{
ulong n;
string str()
{
if (n == 0) { return "0"; }
