On 02/14/2015 12:13 PM, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Saturday, 14 February 2015 at 20:08:09 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
int foo()
{
return 42;
}
the difference is C# also allows you to implement A.foo separately from
B.foo. I don't think D allows that.
Yeah, I obviously read too
ref2401 wrote:
> Does D provide a way for explicit interface implementation?
> [C#] https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms173157.aspx
Not exactly, but you may try something like this:
interface A
{
void foo();
}
interface B
{
void foo();
}
class C : A
{
class Nest
On Saturday, 14 February 2015 at 20:08:09 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
int foo()
{
return 42;
}
the difference is C# also allows you to implement A.foo
separately from B.foo. I don't think D allows that.
You can call a specific interface at the usage site, but
implementing t
On 02/14/2015 09:19 AM, ref2401 wrote:
Does D provide a way for explicit interface implementation?
[C#] https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms173157.aspx
Apparently, yes:
interface A
{
int foo();
}
interface B
{
int foo();
}
class C : A, B
{
int foo()
{
return
Does D provide a way for explicit interface implementation?
[C#] https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms173157.aspx
