Daniel Keep Wrote:
> It would be nice, but it's really not feasible without widespread editor
> and/or keyboard support for extra symbols, which I just don't see happening.
http://www.microsoft.com/globaldev/tools/msklc.mspx
:)))
Christopher Wright Wrote:
> BCS wrote:
> > Hello Christopher,
> >
> >> (As an aside, Google's link obfuscation is hella annoying.)
> >
> > ??
>
> You do the google search for ISO9899. The link they give you:
> http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&ct=res&cd=4&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.open-std.o
Robert Fraser wrote:
> BCS wrote:
>> Reply to Robert,
>>
>>
>>> Hmm... I'd say x.⊆(y) is preferable x.isSubsetOf(y), but it's not a
>>> huge deal.
>>>
>>
>> Only until you have to type it. I think universal alpha includes only
>> the union of things that can be easily typed on standard keyboards.
Hello Robert,
BCS wrote:
Reply to Robert,
Hmm... I'd say x.⊆(y) is preferable x.isSubsetOf(y), but it's not a
huge deal.
Only until you have to type it. I think universal alpha includes only
the union of things that can be easily typed on standard keyboards. I
don't think any keyboard (ok
BCS wrote:
Reply to Robert,
Hmm... I'd say x.⊆(y) is preferable x.isSubsetOf(y), but it's not a
huge deal.
Only until you have to type it. I think universal alpha includes only
the union of things that can be easily typed on standard keyboards. I
don't think any keyboard (ok maybe an APL
Hello Stewart,
So I guess it's therefore likely to exclude ancient scripts with not
enough modern use to have warranted the invention of a standard
keyboard therefor. (One omission I noticed is Phoenician, though that
may be also due to its later arrival in Unicode.)
Anyone who really wants
BCS wrote:
Reply to Stewart,
My impression was that it's some standard list of Unicode characters
that are letters (or logogram or ideogram or whatever) in some
language somewhere in the world.
That's more or less the same thing (although I'll admit, my original
comment is not well stated).
Reply to Christopher,
BCS wrote:
Hello Christopher,
(As an aside, Google's link obfuscation is hella annoying.)
??
You do the google search for ISO9899. The link they give you:
http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&ct=res&cd=4&url=http%3A%2F%2
Fwww.open-std.org%2FJTC1%2FSC22%2Fwg14%
BCS wrote:
Hello Christopher,
(As an aside, Google's link obfuscation is hella annoying.)
??
You do the google search for ISO9899. The link they give you:
http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&ct=res&cd=4&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.open-std.org%2FJTC1%2FSC22%2Fwg14%2Fwww%2Fdocs%2Fn1124.pdf&ei
Reply to Stewart,
BCS wrote:
Only until you have to type it. I think universal alpha includes only
the union of things that can be easily typed on standard keyboards.
What inspired you to form that opinion?
My impression was that it's some standard list of Unicode characters
that are lett
BCS wrote:
Reply to Robert,
Hmm... I'd say x.⊆(y) is preferable x.isSubsetOf(y), but it's not a
huge deal.
Only until you have to type it. I think universal alpha includes only
the union of things that can be easily typed on standard keyboards.
What inspired you to form that opinion?
M
Reply to Robert,
Hmm... I'd say x.⊆(y) is preferable x.isSubsetOf(y), but it's not a
huge deal.
Only until you have to type it. I think universal alpha includes only the
union of things that can be easily typed on standard keyboards. I don't think
any keyboard (ok maybe an APL keyboard) ha
grauzone wrote:
> Robert Fraser wrote:
>> Jarrett Billingsley wrote:
>>> On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 8:55 PM, Robert Fraser
>>> wrote:
Hi all,
Quick question: I want to use some unicode identifiers, but I get
"unsupported char 0xe2", both with using and not using a BOM. The
c
Hello Christopher,
(As an aside, Google's link obfuscation is hella annoying.)
??
Robert Fraser wrote:
> Jarrett Billingsley wrote:
>> On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 8:55 PM, Robert Fraser
>> wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Quick question: I want to use some unicode identifiers, but I get
>>> "unsupported char 0xe2", both with using and not using a BOM. The characters
>>> in question are t
Robert Fraser wrote:
Hi all,
Quick question: I want to use some unicode identifiers, but I get
"unsupported char 0xe2", both with using and not using a BOM. The
characters in question are the superset/subset-equals operators: ⊇ and
⊆... Perhaps these are just unsupported by DMD (in which case
Jarrett Billingsley wrote:
> On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 8:55 PM, Robert Fraser
> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Quick question: I want to use some unicode identifiers, but I get
>> "unsupported char 0xe2", both with using and not using a BOM. The characters
>> in question are the superset/subset-equals oper
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 8:55 PM, Robert Fraser
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Quick question: I want to use some unicode identifiers, but I get
> "unsupported char 0xe2", both with using and not using a BOM. The characters
> in question are the superset/subset-equals operators: ⊇ and ⊆... Perhaps
> these ar
Hi all,
Quick question: I want to use some unicode identifiers, but I get
"unsupported char 0xe2", both with using and not using a BOM. The
characters in question are the superset/subset-equals operators: ⊇ and
⊆... Perhaps these are just unsupported by DMD (in which case, I'll file
a bug)?
19 matches
Mail list logo
