On Friday, 5 June 2015 at 20:14:51 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 6/5/15 4:03 PM, Dennis Ritchie wrote:
It would be very good, because many have long been trying to
implement
this functionality handmade :)
http://www.prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?DanielKeep/shfmt
Yes, unfortunately that v
On 6/5/15 4:03 PM, Dennis Ritchie wrote:
On Friday, 5 June 2015 at 19:08:19 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
It's just so I didn't have to escape the quotes :D
Otherwise it looks like this:
return "writefln(\"mode " ~ mode ~ ": %s\", " ~ value ~ ");"
But such an option is possible to do work
On Friday, 5 June 2015 at 19:08:19 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
It's just so I didn't have to escape the quotes :D
Otherwise it looks like this:
return "writefln(\"mode " ~ mode ~ ": %s\", " ~ value ~ ");"
But such an option is possible to do work? : D
return `writefln(q"["mode]" ` ~ mod
On 6/5/15 11:52 AM, Dennis Ritchie wrote:
On Friday, 5 June 2015 at 14:31:19 UTC, anonymous wrote:
You messed up the quotes. You might be mistaking backticks for
something special, but they're basically just quotes.
Yes, the sample program really made me think that gravis (backticks) -
is some
On Friday, 5 June 2015 at 14:31:19 UTC, anonymous wrote:
You messed up the quotes. You might be mistaking backticks for
something special, but they're basically just quotes.
Yes, the sample program really made me think that gravis
(backticks) - is something special...
On Friday, 5 June 2015 at 14:23:15 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 6/5/15 10:15 AM, Dennis Ritchie wrote:
Thanks. It looks really simple, but I still do not understand
the
concept of using mixins in full.
I do not understand why in this line:
return `writefln("mode ` ~ mode ~ `: %s", ` ~
On Friday, 5 June 2015 at 14:15:09 UTC, Dennis Ritchie wrote:
For example, why here I can simply write:
void main() {
int b = 5;
mixin(`int a = b;`);
assert(a == 5);
}
This becomes:
int b = 5;
int a = b;
assert(a == 5);
Why should not I write like this:
void main()
On 6/5/15 10:15 AM, Dennis Ritchie wrote:
On Friday, 5 June 2015 at 13:13:15 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
string foo(string mode, string value)
{
return `writefln("mode ` ~ mode ~ `: %s", ` ~ value ~ `);`;
}
void main()
{
mixin(foo("Y", "3"));
mixin(foo("X", "2"));
}
Thanks. It l
On Friday, 5 June 2015 at 13:13:15 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
string foo(string mode, string value)
{
return `writefln("mode ` ~ mode ~ `: %s", ` ~ value ~ `);`;
}
void main()
{
mixin(foo("Y", "3"));
mixin(foo("X", "2"));
}
Thanks. It looks really simple, but I still do not unde
On 6/5/15 9:01 AM, Dennis Ritchie wrote:
Macros and operation of pattern matching `=>` in Rust I can write
something like this:
macro_rules!foo {
(x => $e:expr) => (println!("mode X: {}", $e));
(y => $e:expr) => (println!("mode Y: {}", $e));
}
fn main() {
foo!(y => 3); // mode Y:
Macros and operation of pattern matching `=>` in Rust I can write
something like this:
macro_rules!foo {
(x => $e:expr) => (println!("mode X: {}", $e));
(y => $e:expr) => (println!("mode Y: {}", $e));
}
fn main() {
foo!(y => 3); // mode Y: 3
foo!(x => 2); // mode X: 2
}
How is
11 matches
Mail list logo
