On Monday, 5 September 2016 at 12:03:49 UTC, Patric wrote:
On Monday, 5 September 2016 at 11:53:12 UTC, Daniel Kozak wrote:
Do you have windows or linux? Which version of dmd you have?
Now on my job pc:
DMD32 D Compiler v2.071.0-b2
In home i have 64 last version, and with my first version it
On Monday, 5 September 2016 at 11:55:09 UTC, rikki cattermole
wrote:
Be a bit careful there, when a struct is moved around its
destructor will be called. This is why I suggested you to use
the GC to allocate memory or else ouch.
So you'll find very quickly that you will be having segfaults
On Monday, 5 September 2016 at 11:53:12 UTC, Daniel Kozak wrote:
Do you have windows or linux? Which version of dmd you have?
Now on my job pc:
DMD32 D Compiler v2.071.0-b2
In home i have 64 last version, and with my first version it
shows the DString faster than my custom.
On 05/09/2016 11:45 PM, Patric wrote:
On Monday, 5 September 2016 at 11:20:08 UTC, rikki cattermole wrote:
On 05/09/2016 11:11 PM, Patric wrote:
I´m playing remaking D functionalities with nogc structs, and to at
least match D performance.
But in this particular case i´m unable to get near D pe
Dne 5.9.2016 v 13:45 Patric via Digitalmars-d-learn napsal(a):
On Monday, 5 September 2016 at 11:20:08 UTC, rikki cattermole wrote:
On 05/09/2016 11:11 PM, Patric wrote:
I´m playing remaking D functionalities with nogc structs, and to at
least match D performance.
But in this particular case
On Monday, 5 September 2016 at 11:20:08 UTC, rikki cattermole
wrote:
On 05/09/2016 11:11 PM, Patric wrote:
I´m playing remaking D functionalities with nogc structs, and
to at
least match D performance.
But in this particular case i´m unable to get near D
performance. Can
someone point me out
Dne 5.9.2016 v 13:20 rikki cattermole via Digitalmars-d-learn napsal(a):
...
Don't forget to disable the GC as well so it doesn't try to collect
during the tests.
This is not true, in many cases it will hurt performance a lot
On Monday, 5 September 2016 at 11:11:23 UTC, Patric wrote:
I´m playing remaking D functionalities with nogc structs, and
to at least match D performance.
But in this particular case i´m unable to get near D
performance.
Can someone point me out what i´m doing wrong, or if there is
some magic b
On 05/09/2016 11:11 PM, Patric wrote:
I´m playing remaking D functionalities with nogc structs, and to at
least match D performance.
But in this particular case i´m unable to get near D performance. Can
someone point me out what i´m doing wrong, or if there is some magic
behind the curtains on D
Dne 5.9.2016 v 13:17 Daniel Kozak napsal(a):
Dne 5.9.2016 v 13:11 Patric via Digitalmars-d-learn napsal(a):
I´m playing remaking D functionalities with nogc structs, and to at
least match D performance.
But in this particular case i´m unable to get near D performance.
Can someone point me ou
Dne 5.9.2016 v 13:11 Patric via Digitalmars-d-learn napsal(a):
I´m playing remaking D functionalities with nogc structs, and to at
least match D performance.
But in this particular case i´m unable to get near D performance. Can
someone point me out what i´m doing wrong, or if there is some mag
I´m playing remaking D functionalities with nogc structs, and to
at least match D performance.
But in this particular case i´m unable to get near D performance.
Can someone point me out what i´m doing wrong, or if there is
some magic behind the curtains on D strings?
https://dpaste.dzfl.pl/1c
12 matches
Mail list logo
