Re: C++'s "defaulted comparison operators" proposal

2014-06-18 Thread Ellery Newcomer via Digitalmars-d-learn
On Wednesday, 18 June 2014 at 05:49:30 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote: Can you come up with a D library solution to the following C++11 proposal: http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2014/n3950.html did this years ago (or something similar, at least): https://bitbucket.org/ariovist

Re: C++'s "defaulted comparison operators" proposal

2014-06-18 Thread Artur Skawina via Digitalmars-d-learn
On 06/18/14 07:49, Ali Çehreli via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote: > The idea is to be able to have standard comparison behavior for structs > without boilerplate. For example, if the ordering should consider all members > of the following struct one after the other (first 'i', then 'l', and finally

C++'s "defaulted comparison operators" proposal

2014-06-17 Thread Ali Çehreli via Digitalmars-d-learn
Can you come up with a D library solution to the following C++11 proposal: http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2014/n3950.html The idea is to be able to have standard comparison behavior for structs without boilerplate. For example, if the ordering should consider all members