On Thursday, 4 June 2015 at 16:52:30 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 06/04/2015 04:27 AM, Meta wrote:
> On Wednesday, 3 June 2015 at 21:05:42 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
>> a[] = b;// makes the elements of 'a' same as 'b's
elements
> Isn't a[] = b deprecated syntax? I believe you have to use
a[]
On 06/04/2015 04:27 AM, Meta wrote:
> On Wednesday, 3 June 2015 at 21:05:42 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
>> a[] = b;// makes the elements of 'a' same as 'b's elements
> Isn't a[] = b deprecated syntax? I believe you have to use a[] = b[] now.
Thanks. Unfortunately, 2.067.1 'dmd -w -de' is st
On Wednesday, 3 June 2015 at 21:05:42 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 06/03/2015 01:45 PM, Paul wrote:
> On Wednesday, 3 June 2015 at 20:33:02 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
>> > pathList[][n] ~= CoOrd(cX, cY);
>>
>> I don't think you need the empty [] there. pathList[n] is
one of the
>> paths and you are a
On 06/03/2015 01:45 PM, Paul wrote:
> On Wednesday, 3 June 2015 at 20:33:02 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
>> > pathList[][n] ~= CoOrd(cX, cY);
>>
>> I don't think you need the empty [] there. pathList[n] is one of the
>> paths and you are adding a coordinate to it:
>
> Urgh, *that* is how I was confusi
On Wednesday, 3 June 2015 at 20:33:02 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
> pathList[][n] ~= CoOrd(cX, cY);
I don't think you need the empty [] there. pathList[n] is one
of the paths and you are adding a coordinate to it:
Urgh, *that* is how I was confusing myself, the rest of the code
'looks right'. St
On Wednesday, 3 June 2015 at 20:38:54 UTC, anonymous wrote:
Declarations are right to left, accesses are left to right.
Succinctly put, even I should be able to remember that.
Paul
On Wednesday, 3 June 2015 at 20:28:57 UTC, Paul wrote:
Ooops, this is what I meant to post:
struct CoOrd
{
int x, y;
}
CoOrd[][NumPaths]pathList;
I append values like so...
pathList[][n] ~= CoOrd(cX, cY);
The "[]" does nothing here. You can leave it (or add more) out
without chang
On 06/03/2015 01:28 PM, Paul wrote:
> Ooops, this is what I meant to post:
>
> struct CoOrd
> {
> int x, y;
> }
>
> CoOrd[][NumPaths]pathList;
>
>
> I append values like so...
>
> pathList[][n] ~= CoOrd(cX, cY);
I don't think you need the empty [] there. pathList[n] is one of the
paths and
Ooops, this is what I meant to post:
struct CoOrd
{
int x, y;
}
CoOrd[][NumPaths]pathList;
I append values like so...
pathList[][n] ~= CoOrd(cX, cY);
But to get the expected values, I need to access them like this
example for last x co-ord of last item:
int xx = pathList[NumPaths
On Wednesday, 3 June 2015 at 11:42:35 UTC, Paul wrote:
the concept is simple enough...
Well I thought it was; everything works as expected but I need to
access values in the c style, i.e g the definitions:
struct CoOrd
{
int x, y;
}
CoOrd[][NumPaths]pathList;
On Wednesday, 3 June 2015 at 02:41:01 UTC, Dennis Ritchie wrote:
Actually, I have a small question. And what is the advantage of
indexing arrays D-style in front of a C-style arrays? Because
C-style indexing is much more familiar: first, we point line,
and then the columns.
That's what I mean
I used to not even notice that if D declare an array in C-style,
and then indexing it will also in C-style :)
Actually, I have a small question. And what is the advantage of
indexing arrays D-style in front of a C-style arrays? Because
C-style indexing is much more familiar: first, we point line
On 6/2/15 9:43 PM, Mike Parker wrote:
On 6/3/2015 1:37 AM, Paul wrote:
On Tuesday, 2 June 2015 at 16:23:32 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Tuesday, 2 June 2015 at 16:17:23 UTC, Paul wrote:
CoOrd[NumPaths][] pathList;
Try CoOrd[][NumPaths].
The order is opposite in D style than in C style (I th
On 6/3/2015 1:37 AM, Paul wrote:
On Tuesday, 2 June 2015 at 16:23:32 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Tuesday, 2 June 2015 at 16:17:23 UTC, Paul wrote:
CoOrd[NumPaths][] pathList;
Try CoOrd[][NumPaths].
The order is opposite in D style than in C style (I thnk the D style
makes more sense, it jus
On Tuesday, 2 June 2015 at 16:23:32 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Tuesday, 2 June 2015 at 16:17:23 UTC, Paul wrote:
CoOrd[NumPaths][] pathList;
Try CoOrd[][NumPaths].
The order is opposite in D style than in C style (I thnk the D
style makes more sense, it just reads one direction, but it
do
On Tuesday, 2 June 2015 at 16:22:58 UTC, Alex Parrill wrote:
On Tuesday, 2 June 2015 at 16:17:23 UTC, Paul wrote:
This array of structures...
CoOrd pathList[NumPaths][];
generates a warning when compiled with DMD 32 bit -w flag, but
not 64 bit.
This gives me a warning using rdmd on x64 XUbu
On Tuesday, 2 June 2015 at 16:17:23 UTC, Paul wrote:
This array of structures...
CoOrd pathList[NumPaths][];
generates a warning when compiled with DMD 32 bit -w flag, but
not 64 bit.
This gives me a warning using rdmd on x64 XUbuntu.
If I correct the declaration to 'D style'
CoOrd[NumPat
On Tuesday, 2 June 2015 at 16:17:23 UTC, Paul wrote:
CoOrd[NumPaths][] pathList;
Try CoOrd[][NumPaths].
The order is opposite in D style than in C style (I thnk the D
style makes more sense, it just reads one direction, but it does
index differently than you're used to in C)
This array of structures...
CoOrd pathList[NumPaths][];
generates a warning when compiled with DMD 32 bit -w flag, but
not 64 bit.
If I correct the declaration to 'D style'
CoOrd[NumPaths][] pathList;
It compiles without warning but I cannot append items to the
array like this...
pathLis
19 matches
Mail list logo
