On Monday, 26 August 2019 at 09:14:23 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
The dot makes it so that it's specifically referencing a
module-level symbol (be it in that module or an imported
module) instead of a local or member symbol.
Ah, thanks. Now it makes sense! :)
On Monday, 26 August 2019 at 09:14:23 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Sunday, August 25, 2019 11:59:08 PM MDT berni via
- Jonathan M Davis
OFFTOPIC:
(dont have ur email. dont like emails cuz too officially and too
long)
(and dont want create new topic. this one probably
solved/finished alr
On Sunday, August 25, 2019 11:59:08 PM MDT berni via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> Out of curiosity: Browsing the source of stdio.d I found that
> flush() is implemented by calling fflush from some C++ library.
> What I don't understand: Why is the call to fflush preceded by a
> dot?
The dot makes
Out of curiosity: Browsing the source of stdio.d I found that
flush() is implemented by calling fflush from some C++ library.
What I don't understand: Why is the call to fflush preceded by a
dot?
