On 10/08/2010 20:01, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Tue, 10 Aug 2010 13:45:03 -0400, Chris Williams wrote:
I'm writing a fairly large, multithreaded application and some part
of it is causing periodic access errors.
Say that I have an associative array like:
uint[ char[] ] nameToId;
If I se
On 22/07/2010 23:21, dcoder wrote:
== Quote from Steven Schveighoffer (schvei...@yahoo.com)'s article
This is what I think you should use:
string[int[2]]
Although, I'm not sure if you can then do something like:
chessboard[[0,1]] = "Rook";
as the [0, 1] is typed as a dynamic array. If it does w
On 22/07/2010 22:57, dcoder wrote:
== Quote from dcoder (dco...@devnull.com)'s article
Hello. I want to use associative arrays, but have a 2-d int array as my
index. so something like:
string[int[][]] chessboard;
chessboard[[0,0]] = "Rook";
chessboard[[0,1]] = "Knight";
Is this possible? I ca
On 22/07/2010 07:54, Dave wrote:
On 7/21/2010 7:27 PM, awishformore wrote:
On 22/07/2010 03:36, Sean Kelly wrote:
Make the ctors "shared static this()" -- those are only constructed
once when the process starts up. The non-shared static ctors are
thread-local.
That concept is re
On 22/07/2010 03:36, Sean Kelly wrote:
Make the ctors "shared static this()" -- those are only constructed once when
the process starts up. The non-shared static ctors are thread-local.
That concept is really weird, though. So this applies to anything
static, not just variables?
I have a question to static constructors in D2 and with threads.
-LogManager.d-
import std.stdio;
final class LogManager
{
private:
static __gshared LogManager instance;
public:
static this()
{
Am 20.07.2010 15:38, schrieb Lars T. Kyllingstad:
On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 13:26:56 +, Lars T. Kyllingstad wrote:
On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 14:59:18 +0200, awishformore wrote:
Following this discussion on announce, I was wondering why string
literals are zero-terminated. Or to re-formulate, why
Following this discussion on announce, I was wondering why string
literals are zero-terminated. Or to re-formulate, why only string
literals are zero-terminated. Why that inconsistency? What's the
rationale behind it? Does anyone know?
/Max
Did you test with a string that was not in the
