On Thursday, 19 January 2017 at 02:59:04 UTC, Ignacious wrote:
I have the need to create an enum flag like structure to
specify certain properties of a type easily.
e.g.,
enum properties
{
Red,
Blue,
Hot,
Sexy,
Active,
...
}
But some properties will be mutually exclusive. I
I have the need to create an enum flag like structure to specify
certain properties of a type easily.
e.g.,
enum properties
{
Red,
Blue,
Hot,
Sexy,
Active,
...
}
But some properties will be mutually exclusive. I would like to
contain all those rules for in the enum itself fo
On Thursday, 19 January 2017 at 02:51:03 UTC, rikki cattermole
wrote:
On 19/01/2017 3:35 PM, Ignacious wrote:
On Thursday, 19 January 2017 at 02:25:44 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe
wrote:
On Thursday, 19 January 2017 at 02:15:04 UTC, rikki
cattermole wrote:
On 19/01/2017 3:08 PM, Ignacious wrote:
class
On Thursday, 19 January 2017 at 02:25:44 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Thursday, 19 January 2017 at 02:15:04 UTC, rikki cattermole
wrote:
On 19/01/2017 3:08 PM, Ignacious wrote:
class Y
{
int y;
alias y this;
}
class X
{
Y[] x;
alias x this;
}
This should not fail:
X x = new X;
class Y
{
int y;
alias y this;
}
class X
{
Y[] x;
alias x this;
}
Yet X ~= 3; fails.
3 should be implicitly convertible to Y and then ~ should assign
it.
?
string concatenation is weird.
We can do stuff like
writeln(x);
where x is, say a struct and it prints fine
but when we do
writeln(x ~ " ok");
it fails and requires us to convert x!
Why can't string concatenation automatically try to convert the
arguments? Is there any reason this is bad b
On Saturday, 14 January 2017 at 11:32:10 UTC, Marc Schütz wrote:
You can utilize a little-known `switch` syntax trick in
combination with `foreach`. Because a `foreach` over tuples is
unrolled at compile time, it works even if your fields don't
have exactly the same types:
---
On Saturday, 14 January 2017 at 08:30:04 UTC, Meta wrote:
On Saturday, 14 January 2017 at 05:29:49 UTC, Nicholas Wilson
wrote:
enum XX
{
X = Q.X.offsetof,
Y = Q.Y.offsetof
//ect.
}
and then
*(cast(void*)(this) + x) = e; //if inside struct/class
or
*(cast(void*)(q) + x) = e; // if
When doing common functionality for a switch, is there any way to
optimize:
switch(x)
{
case X:
q.X = e;
break;
case Y:
q.Y = e;
break
etc...
}
e is basically a value that, depending on the what kind(x), we
assign it to a field in q. The name of
On Wednesday, 11 January 2017 at 19:23:10 UTC, Razvan Nitu wrote:
Hi,
I am currently trying to create a function
makeMultidimensionalArray which allocates memory for a
multidimensional array. It is very similar with [1],
the difference being that it is uninitialized. Here is the code:
auto m
On Wednesday, 11 January 2017 at 03:49:42 UTC, Joakim wrote:
On Tuesday, 10 January 2017 at 18:48:17 UTC, Ignacious wrote:
[...]
It's probably not easier, and in any case, android-x86 won't be
supported, largely because I don't have any working x86 devices.
[...]
Ok, well the x86 thing wa
On Wednesday, 11 January 2017 at 19:23:10 UTC, Razvan Nitu wrote:
Hi,
I am currently trying to create a function
makeMultidimensionalArray which allocates memory for a
multidimensional array. It is very similar with [1],
the difference being that it is uninitialized. Here is the code:
auto m
Well, I posed a reply but I guess it didn't get though ;/
I'm only suing android-x86 because I thought it would be easier
to test/debug. My device is a cortex-arm7.
Two questions I have:
1. In the command lines present there is a lot of use of `x86`. I
used them to compile the hello world fo
How difficult is it to build for x86/x64?
Would be nice to be able to use something like
http://www.android-x86.org/
as a test instead of an actual device.
Does one simply have to use the proper ldc2/dmd and link in the
correct libs? or is it more complex?
Also, I'm a bit confused on how to
On Monday, 9 January 2017 at 08:28:04 UTC, Joakim wrote:
On Monday, 9 January 2017 at 00:40:35 UTC, Ignacious wrote:
On Sunday, 8 January 2017 at 22:19:31 UTC, Joakim wrote:
On Sunday, 8 January 2017 at 21:52:01 UTC, Ignacious wrote:
Not sure what is going on, of course ;) So much BS just to
d
On Sunday, 8 January 2017 at 22:19:31 UTC, Joakim wrote:
On Sunday, 8 January 2017 at 21:52:01 UTC, Ignacious wrote:
Not sure what is going on, of course ;) So much BS just to do
something that is suppose to be simple ;)
test.d
void main()
{
}
here is test.o
http://pastebin.com/NRrKgKtb
On Sunday, 8 January 2017 at 20:34:21 UTC, Joakim wrote:
On Sunday, 8 January 2017 at 19:58:06 UTC, Ignacious wrote:
I suppose it will be easier to install a real ubuntu distro
rather than relying on windows? All these issues seem to be
related to outdated versions?
Distributor ID: Ubuntu
Des
Yeah, not a good idea to build from source yourself. Try the
advice here, ie see if you can install a package with that
library or just symlink to the older library if not:
http://askubuntu.com/questions/771047/erlang-error-while-loading-shared-libraries-libncursesw-so-6
Well, the only wa
when one prints out a string with some extended(I guess it's
unicode), writeln prints out the ascii versions that do not
correspond to what they really are. e.g., an umlaut is printed
out as 1/2 or something.
how to get it to print the correct codes?
On Monday, 2 January 2017 at 03:08:10 UTC, Joakim wrote:
On Sunday, 1 January 2017 at 09:34:24 UTC, Ignacious wrote:
Can you try
sudo apt-get install libconfig9
I don't know if that will install something different, but
it's the command I see others using online. Otherwise, check
if the li
Can you try
sudo apt-get install libconfig9
I don't know if that will install something different, but it's
the command I see others using online. Otherwise, check if the
libconfig++9 package you installed included libconfig.so.9,
which is what ldc is linked against. If not, install the
p
On Saturday, 31 December 2016 at 12:31:07 UTC, Nicholas Wilson
wrote:
On Saturday, 31 December 2016 at 11:39:39 UTC, Nicholas Wilson
wrote:
[...]
Oh and `kernel` could be a template function that would need
its args forwarded to it.
Alias it away using a wrapper?
On Thursday, 29 December 2016 at 10:14:53 UTC, Joakim wrote:
On Wednesday, 28 December 2016 at 23:33:57 UTC, Ignacious wrote:
What is the current status for building android apps in D? I
would like to create simple graphic based apps but don't wanna
get bogged down in trying to get car moving w
On Saturday, 31 December 2016 at 06:33:10 UTC, Ignacious wrote:
On Saturday, 31 December 2016 at 05:52:00 UTC, Ignacious wrote:
On Thursday, 29 December 2016 at 10:14:53 UTC, Joakim wrote:
[...]
Is there any way to get a package that works for windows?
While the steps don't seem too difficul
On Saturday, 31 December 2016 at 05:52:00 UTC, Ignacious wrote:
On Thursday, 29 December 2016 at 10:14:53 UTC, Joakim wrote:
[...]
Is there any way to get a package that works for windows? While
the steps don't seem too difficult to do, things never go well
for me(something always breaks...
On Thursday, 29 December 2016 at 10:14:53 UTC, Joakim wrote:
On Wednesday, 28 December 2016 at 23:33:57 UTC, Ignacious wrote:
What is the current status for building android apps in D? I
would like to create simple graphic based apps but don't wanna
get bogged down in trying to get car moving w
On Thursday, 29 December 2016 at 10:14:53 UTC, Joakim wrote:
On Wednesday, 28 December 2016 at 23:33:57 UTC, Ignacious wrote:
What is the current status for building android apps in D? I
would like to create simple graphic based apps but don't wanna
get bogged down in trying to get car moving w
What is the current status for building android apps in D? I
would like to create simple graphic based apps but don't wanna
get bogged down in trying to get car moving without any wheels.
28 matches
Mail list logo
