On Sunday, 14 August 2022 at 02:30:43 UTC, Paul Backus wrote:
On Sunday, 14 August 2022 at 02:07:05 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
This automatic "combining" of exceptions happens for cleanup
code like scope(exit). (I remember bug(s) for scope(failure).):
To be precise, an exception thrown inside a
On Monday, 14 September 2020 at 09:08:01 UTC, Seb wrote:
You likely want to get involved / raise your support here:
https://github.com/dlang/phobos/pull/7600
Oh this is great, thank you!
-
import std.range;
import std.stdio;
void main ()
{
auto range = sequence!((a, n) => n);
// works, but the chunks are all the same length
auto rngs = range.chunks(4);
writeln(rngs[0]);
writeln(rngs[1]);
writeln(rngs[2]);
// want this
auto ranges = range.???(
On Friday, 28 August 2020 at 12:35:26 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
It's trying to look up the local timezone at compile time.
You need to specify a time zone:
static time =
SysTime(DateTime.fromISOString("20220101T00"),
UTC()).toUnixTime;
-Steve
Aw, thanks Steve!
On Friday, 28 August 2020 at 01:54:02 UTC, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
-
import std.datetime;
void main ()
{
static time =
SysTime(DateTime.fromISOString("20220101T00")).toUnixTime;
}
-
I think I'm supposed to use MonoTime here, right?
-
import std.datetime;
void main ()
{
static time =
SysTime(DateTime.fromISOString("20220101T00")).toUnixTime;
}
-
-
/Library/D/dmd/src/phobos/std/concurrency.d(2574): Error: static
variable lock cannot be read at compile time
/Library/D/dmd/src/phobos/std/concurre
On Wednesday, 5 August 2020 at 16:13:19 UTC, Andrej Mitrovic
wrote:
```
C:\dev> rdmd -m64 --eval="import core.stdc.time;
writeln(time_t.sizeof);"
4
```
According to MSDN this should not be the case:
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/cpp/c-runtime-library/reference/time-time32-time64?view=vs-20
On Wednesday, 5 August 2020 at 16:13:19 UTC, Andrej Mitrovic
wrote:
```
C:\dev> rdmd -m64 --eval="import core.stdc.time;
writeln(time_t.sizeof);"
4
```
According to MSDN this should not be the case:
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/cpp/c-runtime-library/reference/time-time32-time64?view=vs-20
```
C:\dev> rdmd -m64 --eval="import core.stdc.time;
writeln(time_t.sizeof);"
4
```
According to MSDN this should not be the case:
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/cpp/c-runtime-library/reference/time-time32-time64?view=vs-2019
time is a wrapper for _time64 and **time_t is, by default,
equiv
From:
https://github.com/dlang/phobos/blob/10b9174ddcadac52f6a1ea532deab3310d3a8c03/std/concurrency.d#L1913-L1916:
-
///
final @property bool isClosed() @safe @nogc pure
{
synchronized (m_lock)
{
return m_closed;
}
}
-
I don't understand the purpose of this lock. The
On Monday, 22 April 2019 at 04:12:11 UTC, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
Or perhaps for any other editor so I could adapt it and have
syntax highlighting in Sublime when viewing .dt files.
In the meantime I found this:
https://packagecontrol.io/packages/Pug
It seems to work fairly well.
Or perhaps for any other editor so I could adapt it and have
syntax highlighting in Sublime when viewing .dt files.
On 6/9/16, Joerg Joergonson via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> Why would bindings have any issues with licensing?
Just to show that I'm not full of shit, here's the e-mail chain:
On 6/3/11, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm currently porting the Steinberg VST and ASIO SDKs for use with the
I do have (Steinberg) ASIO binding in D.
The problem is I couldn't release the bindings. I've asked Steinberg
if it was OK to release D bindings and they were strongly against it
unfortunately (and this was over 3 years ago..).
Any kind of direct use of ASIO requires their approval first.. meanin
On Thursday, 2 June 2016 at 13:04:00 UTC, ciechowoj wrote:
and found that an assert from `std/path.d:3168` (`globMatch`)
contributes a major amount to the running time of dub.
```
assert(balancedParens(pattern, '[', ']', 0));
assert(balancedParens(pattern, '{', '}', 0));
```
Hmm.. tha
On 6/5/16, Anonymous via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> Should I report this as a dmd bug then? Not sure where / how to
> do that.
You can report it here: https://issues.dlang.org
> I think I'll just let it go; I was able to work passed it anyway
> using "static Note[] empty;", and `null` works to
On 6/5/16, Anonymous via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> static Note[0] empty;
>
> Note[] getNotes(string id)
> {
> return (id in store) ? store[id] : empty;
> }
It's likely an accepts-invalid bug, meaning it should be a compiler
error instead. I d
On 8/1/15, DLearner via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> D is a C derivative, so it seems a shame not to identify causes
> of bugs in C,
> and design them out in D.
This has already been done! D defines an array to be a struct with a
pointer and a length. See this article:
http://www.drdobbs.com/arch
On 4/6/15, Jonathan via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> What's the best way to do this? I'm assuming this should be best
> practice:
> http://dlang.org/traits.html#isSame
>
> struct S { }
> writeln(__traits(isSame, S, S));
>
I'm not even sure when or why this trait was introduced, but you could
use
On 1/1/15, Tobias Pankrath via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> You could implement an OrderedMap!(Key, Value) via
> RedBlackTree!(Tuple!(Key, Value), (a,b) => a[0] < b[0]).
We could add this as an alias into Phobos or perhaps as just a
documentation line on the website.
On 1/1/15, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> If you need consistent ordering of values, you probably want a different
> data structure, like an ordered map
This one works nicely on D1, I'd imagine the D2 port works just the same:
https://github.com/SiegeLord/Tango-D2/blob/d2port/tango/
On 1/1/15, Peter Alexander via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> The order is unspecified, but an iteration must iterate in *some*
> order. The question (if I've understood it correctly), is whether
> that order of iteration changes when the keys aren't changed.
Hmm yeah, that definitely wasn't ever s
On 1/1/15, Idan Arye via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> If I have an associative array and I only modify it's values,
> without changing the keys, can I assume that the order won't
> change?
Associative arrays are not ordered at all.
See the first note here: http://dlang.org/hash-map.html
On Nov 5, 2014 12:10 PM, "Bauss via Digitalmars-d-learn" <
digitalmars-d-learn@puremagic.com> wrote:
>
> Is there any way to track down access violations, instead of me having to
look through my source code manually.
Whenever you don't get a stack trace on Windows, it's 99% guaranteed you're
calli
On 8/29/14, Robin Schroer via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> I definitely reload after setting the context and before trying
> to render.
Typically these kinds of errors happen when a null function pointer is
called. I'd add a few checks in some places to see what might have
been left uninitialized
On 7/9/14, Mike Parker via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> Is it safe to assume that __VERSION__ is the same among DMD, LDC and GDC
> when using the equivalent front-end?
Yes, but not all future compilers might implement this (although I
hope they will). I think there's also __VENDOR__ IIRC.
On Saturday, June 21, 2014, Paul D Anderson via Digitalmars-d-learn <
digitalmars-d-learn@puremagic.com> wrote:
> Does enum have any effect on functions?
I think that's just a parser bug.
On Saturday, June 21, 2014, Paul via Digitalmars-d-learn <
digitalmars-d-learn@puremagic.com> wrote:
> IS there such method get(key, default) for associative arrays, like in
Python?
>
I think it's named getDefault, try that.
This has been asked so many times, is this info not on the website? We
should have an article on the site explaining this in depth. OT: Sorry for
top-quoting and over-quoting.
On Friday, May 30, 2014, monarch_dodra via Digitalmars-d-learn <
digitalmars-d-learn@puremagic.com> wrote:
> On Friday, 30
On 5/24/14, Vlad Levenfeld via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> Any attempt to set callbacks in GLFW returns a null and the
> callback doesn't work.
>
> The first enforcement fails in this example:
>
> DerelictGLFW3.load ();
> enforce (glfwSetErrorCallback (&error_callback));
It's ok if this fails be
On 5/6/14, bearophile via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> There is now std.traits.isInstanceOf that could do what you need.
Someone resurrected a thread from 2011. Of course there's isInstanceOf
when I added it myself at the end of 2012.
On 5/2/14, ref2401 via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> class MyClass {
> Appender!string _stringBuilder;
>
> this() {
> _stringBuilder = Appender!string(null);
> _stringBuilder.clear();
Ouch, ouch, ouch! What's happening is that the 'clear' Appender method
is
On 4/29/14, Dicebot via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> The fact that call to base constructor is not inserted into
> templated this()() looks like a bug to me.
Just found this, and it might be related:
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5770
On 4/28/14, ParticlePeter via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> I found the code with parenthesis in the dlang __traits docs and
> also Philippe Sigauds "D Templates", and I haven't seen any other
> example which works without them. So, when to use which syntax (
> for which purpose ) ?
If you need to
On Monday, 28 April 2014 at 13:52:52 UTC, ParticlePeter wrote:
DMD tells me "Error: variable m cannot be read at compile
time", but why ?
Because 'static foreach' is not an explicit feature yet, so it
depends on the context. When you wrap the trait via:
[__traits(allMembers, MyStruct)]
You'
On 4/27/14, Damian Day via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> So I have this procedure.
Have a look at std.exception.assumeWontThrow:
http://dlang.org/phobos/std_exception.html#.assumeWontThrow
On 4/26/14, Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> No. That's expected.
I wonder whether a better diagnostic could help. But then again, maybe
the hiding would be intentional and the diagnostic would be
spurious/invalid. Not sure..
On 4/24/14, monarch_dodra via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> *That* creates a conflict though :/
Are you sure? I can't reproduce.
On 4/22/14, Steven Schveighoffer via Digitalmars-d-learn
> I think this can be fixed a
different way.
Feel free to file a bug / make a pull. :>
On Tuesday, 22 April 2014 at 15:19:55 UTC, Andre wrote:
Is the cast really needed?
It's a known issue and a filed bug report. I don't have the Issue
number at hand though, someone else will likely provide it.
On 4/22/14, Tim Holzschuh via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> What does (inout int = 0) mean/affect here?
This was asked recently, see my reponse here:
http://forum.dlang.org/post/mailman.102.1396007039.25518.digitalmars-d-le...@puremagic.com
On 4/18/14, monarch_dodra via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> Yeah... "static assert(void.sizeof == 1);" passes :/
Note that you can even have static void arrays. E.g.:
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9691
I'm not sure whether this is an oversight (accepts-invalid) or
something else. But
On 4/19/14, matovitch via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> This won't compile :
>
> import std.stdio;
>
> void main()
> {
> Test t;
> t.data = [152, 32, 64, 28, 95];
> float b = t.get;
> writefln("%s", b);
> }
Because it's probably overkill. At some point it becomes too much
m
On 4/19/14, Lars T. Kyllingstad via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> Say I have two structs, defined like this:
>
> struct A { /* could contain whatever */ }
>
> struct B { A a; }
>
> My question is, is it now guaranteed that A.sizeof==B.sizeof?
The best thing to do is add a static assert a
44 matches
Mail list logo
