On Wednesday, 6 August 2025 at 00:42:43 UTC, Brother Bill wrote:
It doesn't seem like modern D needs the @disable feature.
If a struct has a user provided constructor, then the default
constructor is removed.
Are there any cases where @disable is useful in modern D?
it always seemed like a
It doesn't seem like modern D needs the @disable feature.
If a struct has a user provided constructor, then the default
constructor is removed.
Are there any cases where @disable is useful in modern D?
On Tue, Aug 05, 2025 at 03:27:06AM -0600, Jonathan M Davis via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> On Monday, August 4, 2025 5:21:53 PM Mountain Daylight Time H. S. Teoh via
> Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> > Fast forward 20 or so years, and things have changed a bit. People
> > started using structs for
On Tuesday, 5 August 2025 at 14:19:16 UTC, IchorDev wrote:
On Thursday, 31 July 2025 at 14:44:21 UTC, monkyyy wrote:
On Thursday, 31 July 2025 at 11:29:41 UTC, IchorDev wrote:
I'd much prefer if the above code worked rather than having
to do this:
```d
static foreach(i; 0..a.tupleof.length){
On Thursday, 31 July 2025 at 14:44:21 UTC, monkyyy wrote:
On Thursday, 31 July 2025 at 11:29:41 UTC, IchorDev wrote:
I'd much prefer if the above code worked rather than having to
do this:
```d
static foreach(i; 0..a.tupleof.length){
pragma(msg, __traits(getAttributes, a.tupleof[i]));
//Alias
On Tuesday, 5 August 2025 at 12:32:53 UTC, Brother Bill wrote:
I am in my learning curve for D as an experienced developer.
What has attracted me to D is the combination of features:
Design by Contract, Functional Programming, OOP, and more.
But I have been exploring the "weeds" and am curious i
On Tuesday, 5 August 2025 at 12:32:53 UTC, Brother Bill wrote:
I am in my learning curve for D as an experienced developer.
What has attracted me to D is the combination of features:
Design by Contract, Functional Programming, OOP, and more.
This is both one of the strong and weak points of D:
On Tuesday, 5 August 2025 at 12:32:53 UTC, Brother Bill wrote:
I am in my learning curve for D as an experienced developer.
[...]
Should D be considered a language that should be learned in its
entirety?
Or should most developers stick to the "Safe D" subset?
I think what you should get is th
On Tuesday, 5 August 2025 at 12:32:53 UTC, Brother Bill wrote:
Every language has its "nits", even Eiffel. The concern is
whether that is a straight forward approach to get things done,
avoid the "dragons", and work with existing libraries without
needing a "wizard" to cast some spells.
Shou
I am in my learning curve for D as an experienced developer.
What has attracted me to D is the combination of features:
Design by Contract, Functional Programming, OOP, and more.
But I have been exploring the "weeds" and am curious if D is only
for rocket scientists or for regular programmers, i
On Monday, August 4, 2025 2:02:48 PM Mountain Daylight Time Brother Bill via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> I feel like I am going into the hornet's nest with this
> discussion.
>
> I have created a struct with some members, and want to have a
> parameterless constructor that sets the member values
On Monday, August 4, 2025 5:21:53 PM Mountain Daylight Time H. S. Teoh via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> Fast forward 20 or so years, and things have changed a bit. People
> started using structs for many other things, some beyond the original
> design, and inevitably ran into cases where they rea
12 matches
Mail list logo
