On Friday, 21 February 2025 at 13:07:38 UTC, Paul Backus wrote:
On Friday, 21 February 2025 at 07:44:54 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
I think that what it basically comes down to is that because
-1 fits in int, and int implicitly converts to uint, VRP is
fine with converting the long with a valu
On Friday, 21 February 2025 at 15:48:12 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
But testing this, it doesn't make sense:
```d
uint x = long(-1); // OK
uint y = -1L; // Error: cannot implicitly convert expression
`-1L` of type `long` to `uint`
```
Surely something here is worthy of a bug report
On Wednesday, 19 February 2025 at 23:58:09 UTC, Salih Dincer
wrote:
On Friday, 31 January 2025 at 20:05:54 UTC, Jabari Zakiya wrote:
I'm converting Ruby code to D and am running into issues.
Would appreciate what needs to be done to get it to
compile/run correctly.
I removed 1 line in your co
On Friday, 21 February 2025 at 07:44:54 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
I think that what it basically comes down to is that because -1
fits in int, and int implicitly converts to uint, VRP is fine
with converting the long with a value of -1 to uint. So, as
long as the value fits in 32 bits, the c
