On Tuesday, 9 April 2024 at 00:02:02 UTC, Richard (Rikki) Andrew
Cattermole wrote:
```d
enum Value = (a, b) {
return a + b;
}(1, 2);
```
This alone should be a CTFE only function.
But if we want template parameters, we'd need to wrap it with
the template.
```d
template Value(int a, i
On 09/04/2024 11:42 AM, Liam McGillivray wrote:
On Monday, 8 April 2024 at 08:12:22 UTC, Richard (Rikki) Andrew
Cattermole wrote:
```d
template Foo(Args) {
enum Foo = () {
return Args.init;
}();
}
```
Something like that should work instead.
I'm sorry, but I can't comprehend
On Monday, 8 April 2024 at 08:12:22 UTC, Richard (Rikki) Andrew
Cattermole wrote:
```d
template Foo(Args) {
enum Foo = () {
return Args.init;
}();
}
```
Something like that should work instead.
I'm sorry, but I can't comprehend any of your example. What
would be fed into `Args
On Monday, 8 April 2024 at 13:23:12 UTC, Richard (Rikki) Andrew
Cattermole wrote:
On 09/04/2024 1:20 AM, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
I haven’t done any research on the subject, would be nice if
somebody pointed me to good example of how it’s done.
—
Dmitry Olshansky
CEO @ Glowlabs
https://olshansk
On 09/04/2024 1:20 AM, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
I haven’t done any research on the subject, would be nice if somebody
pointed me to good example of how it’s done.
—
Dmitry Olshansky
CEO @ Glowlabs
https://olshansky.me
In case you haven't already found:
https://github.com/dlang-community/setup
I haven’t done any research on the subject, would be nice if
somebody pointed me to good example of how it’s done.
—
Dmitry Olshansky
CEO @ Glowlabs
https://olshansky.me
On Thursday, 4 April 2024 at 18:14:54 UTC, BoQsc wrote:
I'm looking for more readable standard function to add a
**character** literal to a **string**.
Concatenate is the verb you're looking for, not add. 'Adding' a
`char` to a `string` sounds like you want `myString[] +=
myChar;`, which woul
On Monday, 8 April 2024 at 07:53:01 UTC, Dom DiSc wrote:
On Sunday, 24 March 2024 at 07:41:41 UTC, Dom DiSc wrote:
Try `debug unittest {...}`?
Cool. This seems to work. That's a nice workaroud for tests.
Yay!
Nice, fyi, you can use it with statements inside function bodies
as well. Useful
On 08/04/2024 10:45 AM, Liam McGillivray wrote:
On Sunday, 7 April 2024 at 08:59:55 UTC, Richard (Rikki) Andrew
Cattermole wrote:
Unfortunately runtime and CTFE are the same target in the compiler.
:-(
Will this ever be changed?
A tad unlikely, it would be a rather large change architectural
On Monday, 8 April 2024 at 07:03:40 UTC, Alexandru Ermicioi wrote:
On Sunday, 24 March 2024 at 07:41:41 UTC, Dom DiSc wrote:
I'm creating a library that is completely pure, but it doesn't
compile with pure: at the top because of one impure unittest
(which uses random to test some things only p
On Sunday, 7 April 2024 at 23:32:24 UTC, MrJay wrote:
A better way to apply a attribute to an entire file is to use
an explicit scope you can still apply this to basically the
entire file but leave the tests out of it.
Better than an explicit impure (or pure=false) attribute?
I don't think so.
On Sunday, 24 March 2024 at 07:41:41 UTC, Dom DiSc wrote:
I'm creating a library that is completely pure, but it doesn't
compile with pure: at the top because of one impure unittest
(which uses random to test some things only probabilistic)!
So do I really need to declare every function pure
12 matches
Mail list logo
