On Monday, July 31, 2023 4:55:44 AM MDT Quirin Schroll via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> Apparently, functions can be overloaded solely distinguished by
> attributes:
> ```d
> void f(ref int x) pure { x = 1; }
> void f(ref int x) { x = 2; static int s; ++s; }
> ```
>
> I thought that, maybe, a
On Monday, 31 July 2023 at 16:52:03 UTC, Dennis wrote:
On Monday, 31 July 2023 at 16:09:11 UTC, bachmeier wrote:
Is there a reason it would be difficult to make this not
compile?
No, except that might result in code breakage.
The only way you could have code breakage is if you have
```
void
On Monday, 31 July 2023 at 16:09:11 UTC, bachmeier wrote:
Is there a reason it would be difficult to make this not
compile?
No, except that might result in code breakage.
On Monday, 31 July 2023 at 14:38:52 UTC, ryuukk_ wrote:
Your problem lies at line 1541
You can use `ddemangle` executable to make mangled names
readable, i don't know if it comes with the compiler
```
_platform_memmove
pure nothrow ref @trusted wchar[]
core.internal.array.appending._d_arraya
Your problem lies at line 1541
You can use `ddemangle` executable to make mangled names
readable, i don't know if it comes with the compiler
```
_platform_memmove
pure nothrow ref @trusted wchar[]
core.internal.array.appending._d_arrayappendT!(wchar[],
char)._d_arrayappendT(scope return ref
On 7/31/23 9:09 AM, Cecil Ward wrote:
The unitttests that I have just put in crash spectacularly with an
access violation. I built the code with LDC for Aarch64 / OSX and I
fired up lldb. I now have to learn lldb quick. (BTW Where can I get an
x86 / linux build of lldb or similar ?)
This is t
The unitttests that I have just put in crash spectacularly with
an access violation. I built the code with LDC for Aarch64 / OSX
and I fired up lldb. I now have to learn lldb quick. (BTW Where
can I get an x86 / linux build of lldb or similar ?)
This is the stack dump, and I could do with some
On Monday, 31 July 2023 at 10:55:44 UTC, Quirin Schroll wrote:
What am I missing here?
The duplicate definition check doesn't consider whether a
function is actually unambiguously callable (without e.g. traits
getOverloads), it only prevents creating the same linker symbol
multiple time. So
Apparently, functions can be overloaded solely distinguished by
attributes:
```d
void f(ref int x) pure { x = 1; }
void f(ref int x) { x = 2; static int s; ++s; }
```
I thought that, maybe, a `pure` context calls the `pure` function
and an impure context calls the impure function, but no:
On Monday, 31 July 2023 at 00:32:07 UTC, ryuukk_ wrote:
I reworked the PR, here is the new link:
https://github.com/dlang/dmd/pull/15479
It basically add support for ``pragma(lib, "local:bin/lib.a");``
Makes things easier, and doesn't change any old behavior
Before continuing with the PR, th
On Friday, 28 July 2023 at 08:56:17 UTC, Guillaume Lathoud wrote:
...
Now to the actual question:
I am a bit confused since the source code of `vibe-d:tls` seem
to support openssl-3.0, as visible e.g. in [1] but then in the
config [2] I don't see anything like `"openssl-3.0"`. Maybe I
missed
11 matches
Mail list logo
