foo.byPair
.array
.sort!((a, b) => a.key < b.key)
.map!(a => a.value);
Is it possible to specify in `map` to return the result `[a.key]
= a.value`? To make the result look like `[key:[val], key:[val]]`
On Wednesday, 8 February 2023 at 14:08:47 UTC, bachmeier wrote:
On Wednesday, 8 February 2023 at 06:49:06 UTC, Elfstone wrote:
I believe all three versions (2017,2019,2022) of my VS are up
to date, and I have working C/C++ projects on them.
But you encouraged me to give a few more tries, and I
On Monday, 6 February 2023 at 09:17:07 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
I adapted staticMap's implementation to two sets of arguments:
So I've got this implementation, but wonder if I can generalise
the arg splitting portion rather than write it manually for each
N?
```d
template staticMapN(size_t N
On Wednesday, 8 February 2023 at 19:04:15 UTC, Alexander Zhirov
wrote:
[...]
I would write a data structure and use struct members to reason
about things, but that's probably just preference.
```
import std;
struct DatabaseEntry
{
int id = -1;
string deleted;
string name;
t
On Wednesday, 8 February 2023 at 19:32:22 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
This should do it:
[...]
Yes, it works! I'll try it tomorrow on a large array of data.
Thank you very much!
This turns out to be a simple loop with a comparison of the
existence of a key (whether it is included in an array or n
On 2/8/23 11:04, Alexander Zhirov wrote:
> That is, the result is arrays of table B that are missing OR not equal
> to arrays in table A.
This should do it:
alias MyType = string[string][int];
// 'a' is subtracted from 'b'
MyType difference(MyType b, MyType a) {
MyType result;
foreach
On Wednesday, 8 February 2023 at 18:57:00 UTC, Anonymouse wrote:
Can you explain how you determine how/if two entries are
different?
I apologize. I have not written, in fact, what I need to get.
Array `A`
```d
[
4:["id":"4", "deleted":"f", "name":"6.2"],
3:["id":"3", "deleted":"f", "n
On Wednesday, 8 February 2023 at 17:55:03 UTC, Alexander Zhirov
wrote:
Not an easy task for me, maybe you can advise your compact
solution. There are two associative arrays of type
`string[string][int]`. It is necessary to find the differences
and return them when comparing:
Can you explain h
On Wednesday, 8 February 2023 at 18:08:40 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
Just because this sounds complicated, I hope the data structure
can be designed differently to be more friendly to this
operation. (?)
Ali
This is the result of an SQL query. Roughly speaking, I need to
compare the result of
On 2/8/23 09:55, Alexander Zhirov wrote:
> the differences
Is it considered a difference if a key exists but the value is
different? Or is that an error case if you encounter that?
> return them when comparing:
The representation seems difficult as well. When given this:
> 6:["id":"6",
Not an easy task for me, maybe you can advise your compact
solution. There are two associative arrays of type
`string[string][int]`. It is necessary to find the differences
and return them when comparing:
```d
[
6:["id":"6", "deleted":"f", "name":"6.2_test"],
5:["id":"5", "deleted":"f"
On Wednesday, 8 February 2023 at 06:49:06 UTC, Elfstone wrote:
I believe all three versions (2017,2019,2022) of my VS are up
to date, and I have working C/C++ projects on them.
But you encouraged me to give a few more tries, and I found out
I had been using ..bin64/dmd.exe. Running ..bin/dmd.ex
On Wednesday, 8 February 2023 at 12:12:57 UTC, thebluepandabear
wrote:
but I still think the language has potential in the future
I don't know if they have a sense of crisis. Now `D` in tiebo
ranks `50`.
On Wednesday, 8 February 2023 at 12:07:35 UTC, zjh wrote:
they are always unwilling to add facilities useful to others,
`D`'s community is small, this is the reason!
On Wednesday, 8 February 2023 at 12:10:59 UTC, zjh wrote:
On Wednesday, 8 February 2023 at 12:07:35 UTC, zjh wrote:
they are always unwilling to add facilities useful to others,
`D`'s community is small, this is the reason!
yeah, I've already switched to Java because of this. but I still
t
On Friday, 20 January 2023 at 11:28:23 UTC, thebluepandabear
wrote:
Hi,
In Java/C# you can create purely static classes.
...
Last time, someone proposed to add `private` like `C++'s`, and
then it was the same,they are always unwilling to add facilities
useful to others, and then he left `D
On Monday, 23 January 2023 at 01:28:30 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
I agree with Adam here. The language should provide solutions
and the programmer should pick appropriate ones.
Then just add `static class`, as it will provide a solution
without robbing you of another solution. You still can put
C# just makes it 'easy' for the programmer to define it as
such, without all the nonsense other languages require. In
addition, the C# compiler WILL prevent nonsense code, which is
exactly what I want from a compiler ;-)
Java as well.
On Wednesday, 8 February 2023 at 09:00:40 UTC, thebluepandabear
wrote:
C# just makes it 'easy' for the programmer to define it as
such, without all the nonsense other languages require. In
addition, the C# compiler WILL prevent nonsense code, which is
exactly what I want from a compiler ;-)
J
19 matches
Mail list logo
