void foo()
{
void bar() { foo; }
switch
case: scope(exit) { do } break
bar;
}
fails to execute do
void foo()
{
void bar() { foo; }
switch
case: bar; do return;
bar;
}
does work... yet there is no difference except the scope exit.
In my code it is if do is
On Thursday, 13 June 2019 at 16:08:52 UTC, Mike wrote:
How would a proper destructor of class Foo look like?
Is it enough to set "array" to null? Or do I have to set every
element of the array to null and then the array, or nothing of
that at all because the garbage collecter collects it, if th
On Thursday, 13 June 2019 at 16:08:52 UTC, Mike wrote:
or nothing of that at all because the garbage collecter
collects it, if the reference to Foo is set to null?
That. [The init loop can be shortened to `foreach (ref b; array)
b = new Block();`.]
Hi,
my name is Mike and I'm new to D (coming from a Javabackground)
and for fun I'm trying to learn D now.
I created a simple class
class Block {
int a, b;
this() {}
}
And now I have a dynamic array of objects of this class in
another class:
class Foo {
Block[] array = new
On Thursday, June 13, 2019 3:49:04 AM MDT Jacob Carlborg via Digitalmars-d-
learn wrote:
> On 2019-06-12 22:42, Mek101 wrote:
> > I didn't know it applied to templates other than lambdas.
> >
> > Thank you for your explanation.
>
> It applies to templates, lambdas (which basically are templates) an
On 2019-06-12 22:42, Mek101 wrote:
I didn't know it applied to templates other than lambdas.
Thank you for your explanation.
It applies to templates, lambdas (which basically are templates) and
nested functions.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
