On Wednesday, 18 October 2017 at 12:32:31 UTC, Nordlöw wrote:
Further, are we forced to use the GC for Fiber allocation or
can a sub-class of Fibers implement its own allocation strategy?
You could use std.typecons.scoped!Fiber, though it'll easily
overflow your stack.
Unfortunately Scoped do
On Wednesday, 18 October 2017 at 11:01:56 UTC, Per Nordlöw wrote:
On Wednesday, 18 October 2017 at 09:01:30 UTC, Per Nordlöw
wrote:
Creates an actor (goroutine, whatever), which spawns 10 new
actors, each of them spawns 10 more actors, etc. until one
million actors are created on the final leve
On Friday, 20 October 2017 at 23:01:25 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 10/20/17 6:23 PM, Patrick wrote:
On Friday, 20 October 2017 at 22:15:36 UTC, Steven
Schveighoffer wrote:
On 10/20/17 5:55 PM, Patrick wrote:
Due to the very specific nature of the 'is' operator, why
wouldn't the compile
On 10/20/17 7:04 PM, user1234 wrote:
Strangely this is not always true, in other contexts this is seen as
atype, although probably a bug
class Foo
{
class Bar : this {}
static assert(is(Bar : Foo));
}
Definitely a bug. You should have to write typeof(this) (which is valid
in this
On 10/20/17 6:23 PM, Patrick wrote:
On Friday, 20 October 2017 at 22:15:36 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On 10/20/17 5:55 PM, Patrick wrote:
Due to the very specific nature of the 'is' operator, why wouldn't
the compiler know to implicitly query the class types? Why must it be
explicitly wr
On Friday, 20 October 2017 at 21:42:32 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Friday, October 20, 2017 21:32:48 Patrick via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
The compiler seems to reject the following code in a class
method:
bool test = is(this : myClass);
Could some please explain this?
"this" is not a
On Friday, 20 October 2017 at 22:15:36 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 10/20/17 5:55 PM, Patrick wrote:
Due to the very specific nature of the 'is' operator, why
wouldn't the compiler know to implicitly query the class
types? Why must it be explicitly written, typeof(this)?
The compiler g
On 10/20/17 5:55 PM, Patrick wrote:
Due to the very specific nature of the 'is' operator, why wouldn't the
compiler know to implicitly query the class types? Why must it be
explicitly written, typeof(this)?
The compiler generally doesn't "fix" errors for you, it tells you there
is a problem,
On Friday, 20 October 2017 at 21:42:32 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Friday, October 20, 2017 21:32:48 Patrick via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
The compiler seems to reject the following code in a class
method:
bool test = is(this : myClass);
Could some please explain this?
"this" is not a
On Friday, October 20, 2017 21:32:48 Patrick via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> The compiler seems to reject the following code in a class method:
>
> bool test = is(this : myClass);
>
> Could some please explain this?
"this" is not a type. is(T : U) is true if T is implicitly convertible to U.
T an
The compiler seems to reject the following code in a class method:
bool test = is(this : myClass);
Could some please explain this?
Thanks,
Patrick
On Thursday, 10 August 2017 at 07:00:55 UTC, David J Kordsmeier
wrote:
On Wednesday, 9 August 2017 at 08:37:53 UTC, Johannes Pfau
wrote:
Iain recently updated GDC & phobos up to 2.074 and we have a
pull request for 2.075. So don't worry about fixing old GDC
phobos/druntime versions, recent gd
On Friday, 20 October 2017 at 10:47:57 UTC, Andrew Edwards wrote:
Given a documented source file (eg. process.d), I can generate
the DDOC version of the documentation with the -D switch of DMD
as such:
$ dmd -Dfprocess.html process.d
What do I modify on that line to get the DDOX version o
Given a documented source file (eg. process.d), I can generate
the DDOC version of the documentation with the -D switch of DMD
as such:
$ dmd -Dfprocess.html process.d
What do I modify on that line to get the DDOX version of the same
file?
Thanks,
Andrew
14 matches
Mail list logo
