On Monday, 25 July 2016 at 04:58:55 UTC, Gorge Jingale wrote:
debug mixin("public"); else mixin("private");
Perhaps you could build a patched DMD which ignores 'private'.
Then when you want to compile with -debug, use this custom DMD,
and use the standard DMD the rest of the time.
I imagine
On 07/24/2016 07:15 PM, Gorge Jingale wrote:
Is there a static ternary if?
(A == B) ? C : D;
for compile type that works like static if.
The way to force an expression at compile time is to use it for
something that's needed at compile time. For example, you can initialize
a manifest consta
debug mixin("public"); else mixin("private");
Doesn't work.
It's nice to have public members when debugging because they show
up in the debugger and one can access internals for checking. One
can enable per line using debug but it requires lots of duplicate
code.
Is there any easy way to d
On Monday, 25 July 2016 at 02:36:04 UTC, Chris Wright wrote:
On Mon, 25 Jul 2016 01:49:25 +, Gorge Jingale wrote:
[...]
http://code.dlang.org/packages/unit-threaded
@Values() annotation on a unittest takes a range. Base that on
a range that yields random values and Bob's your uncle.
T
On Mon, 25 Jul 2016 01:49:25 +, Gorge Jingale wrote:
> Is there any leverage in the D library for doing randomized unit
> testing? Testing things with a range of possibilities instead of fixed.
> Each time the test is ran a different version is executed.
> This provides more coverage.
>
> How
Is there a static ternary if?
(A == B) ? C : D;
for compile type that works like static if.
Is there any leverage in the D library for doing randomized unit
testing? Testing things with a range of possibilities instead of
fixed. Each time the test is ran a different version is executed.
This provides more coverage.
How does one create a random number at compile time? Is this the
onl
On Sunday, 24 July 2016 at 18:38:53 UTC, Eppason wrote:
The obvious solution is to refactor Bar, but in the real world,
it is much harder and life would be much easier if I could
remove foo from exists inside S. At worse, if Bar did depend on
foo, I would simply get errors about missing foo.
I use self-introspection and have the case for having to "remove"
things from the mixin.
Typically the mixin will mixin stuff that it does not exist in
the scope it is trying to mix in, a great feature.
But what I would like to do is tell the mixin not to mix in
foo(), this allows me to take
On Saturday, 23 July 2016 at 19:20:10 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2016-07-23 14:27, ParticlePeter wrote:
Is there any kind of project or workflow that converts D
(subset) to
C/CPP ?
No idea about the status but:
https://github.com/adamdruppe/tools/blob/dtoh/dtoh.d
Thanks, I am looking in
Hello everyone!
I want to contribute some project, but I have inconvenient things
related to debug. My high level of using GDB is show a variable
and get type of a variable. In C++ usually I use QtCreator and
debugging was pretty. In Python I have PDB, that can evaluate
code. In D I have just
On Sunday, 24 July 2016 at 15:41:55 UTC, Lodovico Giaretta wrote:
On Sunday, 24 July 2016 at 15:28:53 UTC, Jonathan Marler wrote:
Whoa wait a second...I didn't know you could do this. I
thought everything had to inherit from the object class. Can
you share the syntax to define a class that do
On Sunday, 24 July 2016 at 15:31:28 UTC, lqjglkqjsg wrote:
Almost off topic but I've recognized a typical error here, I
think that many of us have already seen it too. You develop a
nice class. You put attributes everywhere @safe pure nothrow
@nogc. Yay the unittest pass.
Later you use it for
On Sunday, 24 July 2016 at 15:28:53 UTC, Jonathan Marler wrote:
Whoa wait a second...I didn't know you could do this. I
thought everything had to inherit from the object class. Can
you share the syntax to define a class that doesn't derive from
object?
Currently, you cannot. Everything inhe
On Sunday, 24 July 2016 at 15:07:20 UTC, Jack wrote:
Is there a way for singletons that import each other, use each
other's functions?
Like i.e:
--
module sing1;
import sing2;
final class Singleton_1{
static this{
instance = new Singleton_1();
}
static Singleton_1 getInstance(){
return i
On Sunday, 24 July 2016 at 15:09:53 UTC, Lodovico Giaretta wrote:
Yes, making them @nogc would require all existing overrides to
be changed (overrides cannot throw away attributes, but must
specify them explicitly as in the parent class, or stricter).
The real problem making these @nogc is that
On Sunday, 24 July 2016 at 15:09:53 UTC, Lodovico Giaretta wrote:
Remember that comparison of complex objects may require
normalization, which may change the objects themselves and
allocate memory.
Sure but this case will be the exception. If an application
really needs this they can impleme
On Sunday, 24 July 2016 at 14:54:11 UTC, Jonathan Marler wrote:
I believe Rufus was only referring to the virtual methods
defined in the object class. That would be:
toHash (Note: this is already nothrow, that's intersting and
quite restrictive)
opCmp
opEquals
I think all 3 of these are goo
Is there a way for singletons that import each other, use each
other's functions?
Like i.e:
--
module sing1;
import sing2;
final class Singleton_1{
static this{
instance = new Singleton_1();
}
static Singleton_1 getInstance(){
return instance;
}
void foo(){
writeln("Sample");
}
void bar
On Sunday, 24 July 2016 at 09:03:04 UTC, Lodovico Giaretta wrote:
On Sunday, 24 July 2016 at 02:17:27 UTC, Rufus Smith wrote:
[...]
Now you are telling me to "program by trust", because there's
nothing ensuring that I remember to free everything I allocated
with malloc/free, while a GC would
On Sunday, 24 July 2016 at 02:45:57 UTC, rikki cattermole wrote:
On 24/07/2016 2:28 PM, Rufus Smith wrote:
NM, ignore. Seems it was something else going on. Although, if
you know
how how dmd resolves this stuff exactly, it would be nice to
know. Does
it just use the module names regardless of p
On Saturday, 23 July 2016 at 11:05:57 UTC, Etranger wrote:
1- Is there a cleaner way to do it ? I had to use struct
because I want every thing to happen at compile time and on the
stack (without gc). And I had to use string mixins because
template mixin does not work the way I tried to use it
On Sunday, 24 July 2016 at 06:03:59 UTC, Nicholas Wilson wrote:
so I have a main as follows
int main(string[] args)
{
int a = 3;
map!((int x) => x*x)((GlobalPointer!int(&a)),a);
return 0;
}
I want to get the mangleof of the generated call to map but
without referencing it in the .o
On Sunday, 24 July 2016 at 02:17:27 UTC, Rufus Smith wrote:
This just isn't right. What your saying is that because someone
screwed up, we must live with the screw up and build everyone
around the screw up. This mentality is why everyone is so
screwed up in the first place, do you not see that?
On Sunday, 24 July 2016 at 07:54:11 UTC, Jonathan Marler wrote:
On Thursday, 21 July 2016 at 13:37:30 UTC, Saurabh Das wrote:
On Thursday, 21 July 2016 at 12:42:14 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Thursday, 21 July 2016 at 09:41:27 UTC, Saurabh Das wrote:
Java 8 has a 'default' keyword that allows
On Thursday, 21 July 2016 at 13:37:30 UTC, Saurabh Das wrote:
On Thursday, 21 July 2016 at 12:42:14 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Thursday, 21 July 2016 at 09:41:27 UTC, Saurabh Das wrote:
Java 8 has a 'default' keyword that allows interfaces to
provide a default implementation and sub-classes c
26 matches
Mail list logo
