On Friday, 18 December 2015 at 22:35:45 UTC, Jakob Jenkov wrote:
On Sunday, 13 December 2015 at 20:29:47 UTC, Pederator wrote:
I have been thinking about writing about D too. Maybe make a
few videos. But I don't know... I don't know how big the
interest is in total.
Well considering documen
On 19.12.2015 01:06, Fer22f wrote:
Documentation on casts say:
Casting a pointer type to and from a class type is done as a type paint
(i.e. a reinterpret cast).
That sentence doesn't apply. string is not a class, it's an alias for
immutable(char)[], i.e. it's an array.
Reinterpretation i
On Saturday, 19 December 2015 at 00:52:40 UTC, Jakob Jenkov wrote:
To be exact it doesn't need the sources, it needs the function
signatures and type definitions so the equivalent of C header
files. If you don't want to share the full sources with your
library you can generate those header file
To be exact it doesn't need the sources, it needs the function
signatures and type definitions so the equivalent of C header
files. If you don't want to share the full sources with your
library you can generate those header files automatically using
the -H flag in dmd. It will produce a "D inte
On Saturday, 19 December 2015 at 00:09:16 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
On Friday, 18 December 2015 at 23:20:34 UTC, Jakob Jenkov wrote:
I'm coming from Java where "packages" are not that much more
than directories. Each class can be exposed or hidden inside a
package etc.
In Java it is common that a
On Friday, 18 December 2015 at 22:18:34 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
That's what the examples on MSDN do too though, a cast. At
first I thought the binding was missing a const, but the ODBC
docs don't specify it as const either and cast.
The ODBC functions also have a size parameter for string
p
On Friday, 18 December 2015 at 23:20:34 UTC, Jakob Jenkov wrote:
I'm coming from Java where "packages" are not that much more
than directories. Each class can be exposed or hidden inside a
package etc.
In Java it is common that an API consists of many packages and
subpackages. All classes are
On Friday, 18 December 2015 at 22:35:04 UTC, anonymous wrote:
If the parameter is de facto const, then the cast is ok.
Though, maybe it should be marked const then.
I'm just worried about casts because I read somewhere that
strings start with the number of characters inside them (probably
in
I'm coming from Java where "packages" are not that much more than
directories. Each class can be exposed or hidden inside a package
etc.
In Java it is common that an API consists of many packages and
subpackages. All classes are simply wrapped up in a JAR (Zip)
file, and then they can be used
I have a few videos on about D on YT.
But those are ... well suboptimal.
I will probably talk a bit about SDC... when time permits
On 18.12.2015 23:14, Fer22f wrote:
By the use of this tutorial
(http://www.easysoft.com/developer/languages/c/odbc_tutorial.html), I
thought it would be very straightforward to use etc.c.odbc.sqlext and
etc.c.odbc.sql to create a simple odbc application. But as soon as I
started, I noticed a quir
On Sunday, 13 December 2015 at 20:29:47 UTC, Pederator wrote:
Hi. Does anybody who is familair with D consider to make a
comprehensive D programming video tutorial / training / course?
This could be encouraging and helpful for people to start with
D. It could also help in promoting D programmin
I have written more than 750 tutorials about Java
... and web development and other related stuff. Not only Java.
I am just looking at DUB and I can read that there are two config
formats: SDLang and JSON. Which one is the "new" format? Which
one is the "future" of DUB?
On Friday, 18 December 2015 at 22:30:00 UTC, Jakob Jenkov wrote:
I am just looking at DUB and I can read that there are two
config formats: SDLang and JSON. Which one is the "new" format?
Which one is the "future" of DUB?
SDLang is the new one. JSON will remain supported. Use whichever
you li
On Friday, 18 December 2015 at 18:25:03 UTC, Taylor Hillegeist
wrote:
Is it possible to view the expanded form of templates or
perhaps view the post-ctfe pre-compiled d code? I couldn't find
any information on this topic but I think it would be useful.
sometimes I use templates/mixins to write
On Friday, 18 December 2015 at 22:14:04 UTC, Fer22f wrote:
When I remove the string literal and replace it with null, it
compiles. .ptr and .toStringz both give immutable char*
references, and don't work. A "cast(char *)"DNS=*maydns*;""
works, but it feels a lot like a hack that will not work i
By the use of this tutorial
(http://www.easysoft.com/developer/languages/c/odbc_tutorial.html), I thought it would be very straightforward to use etc.c.odbc.sqlext and etc.c.odbc.sql to create a simple odbc application. But as soon as I started, I noticed a quirk:
SQLRETURN ret;
SQLHDBC
On 12/18/2015 12:19 AM, Ola Fosheim Gr wrote:
On Friday, 18 December 2015 at 07:30:52 UTC, drug wrote:
What I mean about order of operations is that if you go
a = b*a+c*c + e;
the compiler is free to rewrite that as
float __tmp0 = a*b;
float __tmp1 = c*c;
and then do either of
float __tmp2 = _
On 12/18/2015 10:54 AM, Taylor Hillegeist wrote:
> pragma(msg, code_generation_function())
>
>
> simple + awesome.
Yes, and perhaps unittest blocks:
unittest
{
assert(makeCode("foo") == "int foo = 42;");
}
Unfortunately, neither works with template mixins or regular templates.
Ali
On Friday, 18 December 2015 at 18:35:40 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Friday, 18 December 2015 at 18:25:03 UTC, Taylor Hillegeist
wrote:
Is it possible to view the expanded form of templates or
perhaps view the post-ctfe pre-compiled d code? I couldn't
find any information on this topic but I th
On Friday, 18 December 2015 at 18:25:03 UTC, Taylor Hillegeist
wrote:
Is it possible to view the expanded form of templates or
perhaps view the post-ctfe pre-compiled d code? I couldn't find
any information on this topic but I think it would be useful.
sometimes I use templates/mixins to write
Is it possible to view the expanded form of templates or perhaps
view the post-ctfe pre-compiled d code? I couldn't find any
information on this topic but I think it would be useful.
sometimes I use templates/mixins to write code for me but,
sometimes i would rather have the expanded functions
On Friday, 18 December 2015 at 07:30:52 UTC, drug wrote:
What I mean about order of operations is that if you go
a = b*a+c*c + e;
the compiler is free to rewrite that as
float __tmp0 = a*b;
float __tmp1 = c*c;
and then do either of
float __tmp2 = __tmp0+__tmp1;
a = __tmp2 + e;
OR
float __tmp2 =
24 matches
Mail list logo
