On Friday, 9 May 2014 at 01:02:39 UTC, FrankLike wrote:
Hi,everyone,
down VisulaD from
http://rainers.github.io/visuald/visuald/StartPage.html
found the virus:Win32.Troj.Undef.(kcloud)
Why?
Frank
https://www.virustotal.com/en/file/bbd76ddb41a80f0526f6cf1e37a2db2736cfa8f29ed3f5fd7a4336bf4c8b
On Thursday, 8 May 2014 at 07:33:34 UTC, Philippe Sigaud via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
A workaround is to wrap it into another template, to 'hide'
__traits.
Like this:
alias Alias(alias a) = a; // A bit circular, I know.
Oh, thank you.
I think there is bug report / enhancement for this. I f
On Friday, 9 May 2014 at 01:02:39 UTC, FrankLike wrote:
Hi,everyone,
down VisulaD from
http://rainers.github.io/visuald/visuald/StartPage.html
found the virus:Win32.Troj.Undef.(kcloud)
Why?
Frank
I've been using VisualD for a long time without problems. If it
makes you nervous, you can get
How to use 'Heat the compiler' to vibe.d?
If you can not stop the exe ,how to do?
Thank you.
Frank
The form-interface-example.exe's Memory Usage is 3.5M,if have
some error,then Memory Usage is 6.7M,if error is closed,the
Memory Usage keeps in 6.7M ,until you close the exe.
the error :such as
'500 - Internal Server Error
Internal Server Error
Internal error information:
object.Exception@
I build the vibe.d's example: http-server-example,the exe's size
is 5M ,it's very good, is better than go's beeblog,the beeblog's
size is 12M.
I very like D,but the Memory Usage is bigger than go's exe.
http-server-example.exe's Memory Usage is 3.5M,but the beeblog's
Memory Usage is 2.5M,I don
Most probably a false positive. What antivir do you use?
http://www.ijinshan.com/duba/newduba.shtml
On Friday, 9 May 2014 at 01:02:39 UTC, FrankLike wrote:
Hi,everyone,
down VisulaD from
http://rainers.github.io/visuald/visuald/StartPage.html
found the virus:Win32.Troj.Undef.(kcloud)
Why?
Frank
Most probably a false positive. What antivir do you use?
On Thursday, 8 May 2014 at 21:10:34 UTC, Arjan wrote:
On Thursday, 8 May 2014 at 14:49:09 UTC, Jack wrote:
I had a compiler error with just a "DOSNEWSIZE Error" with no
more information.
Code: http://pastebin.com/UDAgmjtx
I was trying to learn to implement SQLite connections to a
local file
Hi,everyone,
down VisulaD from
http://rainers.github.io/visuald/visuald/StartPage.html
found the virus:Win32.Troj.Undef.(kcloud)
Why?
Frank
I don't doubt your reasons, but then again, you have what you
have right now in D. Asking for more, you have to provide it,
or convince others to. If it's the latter, you need to make a
very very strong case.
I want to provide it, but before i do, i want to know if there
were any decisions made
On Thu, 08 May 2014 17:05:56 -0400, Yuriy wrote:
How many of these? In order to justify saving 8 bytes per instance, you
have have a lot. I don't see emplacing thousands or tens of thousands
of objects on the stack.
Ok, i guess i have to agree with you. But. Why are you protecting
__monito
Also take a look at the Rust language, that avoids some of your
problems :-)
Done already =). Rust is great, but I like D, and i strongly
believe it's the next big language. If only it could allow a bit
more tweaks ;)
On Thursday, 8 May 2014 at 21:02:05 UTC, Taylor Hillegeist wrote:
By the way the weblink is:
http://www.dsource.org/projects/dexcelapi
That will need some work before it works with modern D.
Yuriy:
But. Why are you protecting __monitors so eagerly? :)
Also take a look at the Rust language, that avoids some of your
problems :-)
Bye,
bearophile
On Thursday, 8 May 2014 at 14:49:09 UTC, Jack wrote:
I had a compiler error with just a "DOSNEWSIZE Error" with no
more information.
Code: http://pastebin.com/UDAgmjtx
I was trying to learn to implement SQLite connections to a
local file with only the path to the file and no port or
localhos
How many of these? In order to justify saving 8 bytes per
instance, you have have a lot. I don't see emplacing thousands
or tens of thousands of objects on the stack.
Ok, i guess i have to agree with you. But. Why are you protecting
__monitors so eagerly? :)
Arrays of objects are stored as arr
By the way the weblink is:
http://www.dsource.org/projects/dexcelapi
On Wednesday, 7 May 2014 at 14:44:57 UTC, Yuriy wrote:
Hello, is there a way of reducing size of an empty class to
just vtbl? I tried to declare it as extern(C++) which works,
but has a nasty side effect of limited mangling.
Just a general FYI:
Classes are relatively heavyweight in D. struct-
So i was thinking i wonder if anyone has a d library for excel
and behold there it was. however, it seems like d has grown since
this was written.
I'm getting bunches of errors telling me that i can't override a
function without the override keyword. which is not a big deal,
however I seem to
On Thu, 08 May 2014 15:47:46 -0400, Yuriy wrote:
But my question more was about where do you plan to put so many of
these objects that you will save a significant amount of bytes, aside
from the heap (which already uses 16-byte blocks).
Hm.. Stack/emplace,
How many of these? In order to j
But my question more was about where do you plan to put so many
of these objects that you will save a significant amount of
bytes, aside from the heap (which already uses 16-byte blocks).
Hm.. Stack/emplace, arrays, n-dimensional arrays? :) Besides, if
we're talking of D as a system language to
On Monday, 24 March 2014 at 23:55:14 UTC, Dragos Carp wrote:
I moved cmaked2 to github [1], updated and simplified the usage
a
little (system cmake patch not necessary anymore). You can give
it a try. Dub registry support is also on the way.
[1] - https://github.com/dcarp/cmake-d
Verified tes
On Thu, 08 May 2014 14:17:42 -0400, Yuriy wrote:
On Thursday, 8 May 2014 at 17:49:01 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
To what end? What are you trying to save?
I'm trying to reimplement std.variant in a nice OOP way, that supports
CTFE, zero-size and a minimal amount of void*-casts. For that
On Thursday, 8 May 2014 at 17:49:01 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
To what end? What are you trying to save?
I'm trying to reimplement std.variant in a nice OOP way, that
supports CTFE, zero-size and a minimal amount of void*-casts. For
that i'm using my VariantPayload(T) class, which i want
On Thu, 08 May 2014 13:21:07 -0400, Yuriy wrote:
On Thursday, 8 May 2014 at 14:57:37 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
The de-facto minimum size of a class is 16 bytes, due to the minimum
block size of the heap.
8 bytes vtbl pointer on 64-bit systems would still allocate into
16-byte block
On Thursday, 8 May 2014 at 14:57:37 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
The de-facto minimum size of a class is 16 bytes, due to the
minimum block size of the heap.
8 bytes vtbl pointer on 64-bit systems would still allocate
into 16-byte blocks.
-Steve
Yes, but still the question remains open
On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 03:19:04PM +, amehat via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> On Thursday, 8 May 2014 at 14:02:06 UTC, monarch_dodra wrote:
[...]
> >Keep in mind that D also has the concept of "Error". Both "Exception"
> >and "Error" derive from "Throwable".
> >
> >"nothrow" only means the func
On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 03:13:48PM +, Dicebot via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> On Thursday, 8 May 2014 at 14:34:27 UTC, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d-learn
> wrote:
> >FWIW, for very long function signatures I write it this way:
> >
> > const(T)[] myVeryLongFunction(T)(const(T)[] arr,
> >
On 05/07/2014 12:07 PM, Yuriy wrote:
On Wednesday, 7 May 2014 at 09:51:01 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
On Wednesday, 7 May 2014 at 09:47:20 UTC, Yuriy wrote:
Hello, is there any way to static if(__ctfe)? I want to declare class
members which are only available in ctfe. Thanx.
Sadly not as far as I
On Thursday, 8 May 2014 at 14:02:06 UTC, monarch_dodra wrote:
On Thursday, 8 May 2014 at 13:06:05 UTC, amehat wrote:
Okay.
Thank you for these explanations, I understand a little better
the exceptions D.
Keep in mind that D also has the concept of "Error". Both
"Exception" and "Error" derive
On Thursday, 8 May 2014 at 14:34:27 UTC, H. S. Teoh via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
FWIW, for very long function signatures I write it this way:
const(T)[] myVeryLongFunction(T)(const(T)[] arr,
intx,
On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 02:50:54PM +, bearophile via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> H. S. Teoh:
>
> >FWIW, for very long function signatures I write it this way:
> >
> > const(T)[] myVeryLongFunction(T)(const(T)[] arr,
> > intx,
> >
On Wed, 07 May 2014 10:44:55 -0400, Yuriy wrote:
Hello, is there a way of reducing size of an empty class to just vtbl? I
tried to declare it as extern(C++) which works, but has a nasty side
effect of limited mangling.
The de-facto minimum size of a class is 16 bytes, due to the minimum bl
H. S. Teoh:
FWIW, for very long function signatures I write it this way:
const(T)[] myVeryLongFunction(T)(const(T)[] arr,
intx,
inty,
intz,
I had a compiler error with just a "DOSNEWSIZE Error" with no
more information.
Code: http://pastebin.com/UDAgmjtx
I was trying to learn to implement SQLite connections to a local
file with only the path to the file and no port or localhost
nonesense from this :
https://github.com/buggins/d
On Thu, 8 May 2014 07:32:52 -0700
"H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d-learn"
wrote:
> On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 01:59:58AM -0700, Jonathan M Davis via
> Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> > On Thu, 08 May 2014 07:29:08 +
> > bearophile via Digitalmars-d-learn
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Jonathan M Davis:
> > >
>
Thanks Ali,
In the second part of that example I was hoping it was understood that
Bar generates it's own signal. Sorry, I guess I wasn't clear; I was just
trying to reduce code.
I think maybe I'm really looking for a way that BarContainer doesn't
have to know that Bar and Foo are connected.
On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 01:59:58AM -0700, Jonathan M Davis via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> On Thu, 08 May 2014 07:29:08 +
> bearophile via Digitalmars-d-learn
> wrote:
>
> > Jonathan M Davis:
> >
> > > ultimately, this sort of thing pretty much always ends up being
> > > highly subjective.
On Thursday, 8 May 2014 at 13:06:05 UTC, amehat wrote:
Okay.
Thank you for these explanations, I understand a little better
the exceptions D.
Keep in mind that D also has the concept of "Error". Both
"Exception" and "Error" derive from "Throwable".
"nothrow" only means the function will not
On Thursday, 8 May 2014 at 12:47:55 UTC, Arjan wrote:
On Thursday, 8 May 2014 at 11:48:14 UTC, Jack wrote:
On Thursday, 8 May 2014 at 11:07:06 UTC, Arjan wrote:
On Thursday, 8 May 2014 at 10:29:16 UTC, Jack wrote:
On Wednesday, 7 May 2014 at 19:03:34 UTC, Arjan wrote:
On Wednesday, 7 May 2014
On Thursday, 8 May 2014 at 12:27:55 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
On Thursday, 8 May 2014 at 12:00:40 UTC, amehat wrote:
On Thursday, 8 May 2014 at 10:14:27 UTC, Jonathan M Davis via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
On Thu, 08 May 2014 09:15:13 +
amehat via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
Hello everyon
On Thursday, 8 May 2014 at 11:48:14 UTC, Jack wrote:
On Thursday, 8 May 2014 at 11:07:06 UTC, Arjan wrote:
On Thursday, 8 May 2014 at 10:29:16 UTC, Jack wrote:
On Wednesday, 7 May 2014 at 19:03:34 UTC, Arjan wrote:
On Wednesday, 7 May 2014 at 06:21:10 UTC, Jack wrote:
First off a Disclaimer: I
On Thursday, 8 May 2014 at 12:00:40 UTC, amehat wrote:
On Thursday, 8 May 2014 at 10:14:27 UTC, Jonathan M Davis via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
On Thu, 08 May 2014 09:15:13 +
amehat via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
Hello everyone,
in java, you can have exceptions on methods.
Thus we can
On Thursday, 8 May 2014 at 10:14:27 UTC, Jonathan M Davis via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
On Thu, 08 May 2014 09:15:13 +
amehat via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
Hello everyone,
in java, you can have exceptions on methods.
Thus we can write:
public static void control (String string) throws
On Thursday, 8 May 2014 at 11:07:06 UTC, Arjan wrote:
On Thursday, 8 May 2014 at 10:29:16 UTC, Jack wrote:
On Wednesday, 7 May 2014 at 19:03:34 UTC, Arjan wrote:
On Wednesday, 7 May 2014 at 06:21:10 UTC, Jack wrote:
First off a Disclaimer: I'm a noob and still learning. Please
don't bash me li
On Thursday, 8 May 2014 at 10:29:16 UTC, Jack wrote:
On Wednesday, 7 May 2014 at 19:03:34 UTC, Arjan wrote:
On Wednesday, 7 May 2014 at 06:21:10 UTC, Jack wrote:
First off a Disclaimer: I'm a noob and still learning. Please
don't bash me like some forums.
Now to the questions: I'm searching fo
On Thu, 08 May 2014 10:27:17 +
bearophile via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> Jonathan M Davis:
>
> > I still think that allowing const on the left is simply a
> > bad design decision.
>
> I opened a request on this, and it was closed down :-)
I know. Walter doesn't agree that it was a bad deci
Jonathan M Davis:
I still think that allowing const on the left is simply a
bad design decision.
I opened a request on this, and it was closed down :-)
Bye,
bearophile
On Wednesday, 7 May 2014 at 19:03:34 UTC, Arjan wrote:
On Wednesday, 7 May 2014 at 06:21:10 UTC, Jack wrote:
First off a Disclaimer: I'm a noob and still learning. Please
don't bash me like some forums.
Now to the questions: I'm searching for a quick and easy way to
integrate SQLite3 in my appl
On Thu, 08 May 2014 09:30:38 +
bearophile via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> Jonathan M Davis:
>
> > Unfortunately, making this consistent by doing something like
> > enforcing that
> > all function attributes go on the right would then be
> > inconsistent with other
> > languages with regards
On Thu, 08 May 2014 09:15:13 +
amehat via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> in java, you can have exceptions on methods.
> Thus we can write:
> public static void control (String string) throws
> MyException {}
>
> Is that possible in D and if so how does it work? If I write th
amehat:
What is the proper behavior for this D?
D doesn't have that Java syntax, because it was widely regarded
as a Java design mistake. So in D omit the throws part. If your
function tree doesn't throw exceptions (but it can throw errors)
add a "nothrow".
Bye,
bearophile
Jonathan M Davis:
Unfortunately, making this consistent by doing something like
enforcing that
all function attributes go on the right would then be
inconsistent with other
languages with regards to the attributes that they have which
go on the left,
This is a job for a Lint. like DScanner :
On Thursday, 8 May 2014 at 09:15:16 UTC, amehat wrote:
Hello everyone,
in java, you can have exceptions on methods.
Thus we can write:
public static void control (String string) throws
MyException {}
Is that possible in D and if so how does it work? If I write
this D:
public void testMe () t
Hello everyone,
in java, you can have exceptions on methods.
Thus we can write:
public static void control (String string) throws
MyException {}
Is that possible in D and if so how does it work? If I write this
D:
public void testMe () throws MyException {}
The compiler refuses to compile.
On Thu, 08 May 2014 07:29:08 +
bearophile via Digitalmars-d-learn
wrote:
> Jonathan M Davis:
>
> > ultimately, this sort of
> > thing pretty much always ends up being highly subjective.
>
> But please put the const/immutable of methods on the right:
>
> struct Foo {
> void bar1() const {
On Tuesday, 6 May 2014 at 15:13:41 UTC, Artur Skawina via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
On 05/06/14 16:45, via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
On Tuesday, 6 May 2014 at 14:25:01 UTC, Artur Skawina via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
I'm not sure why you'd want to wrap the .offsetof expression
in
a template
Artur Skawina:
But I have no idea why anybody would want to wrap this trivial
expression like that.
And, I have no idea if the, hmm, /unconventional/ D offsetof
semantics
are in the bugzilla. It's not really a "bug", but a design
mistake...
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12714
By
> alias a = __traits(getMember, module_, m); // fails
> //Error: basic type expected, not __traits
> //Error: semicolon expected to close alias declaration
> Is this a bug or I've missed something?
It's a syntax limitation for alias. That bites us from time to time.
A w
Jonathan M Davis:
ultimately, this sort of
thing pretty much always ends up being highly subjective.
But please put the const/immutable of methods on the right:
struct Foo {
void bar1() const {} // Good
const void bar2() {} // Bad
}
Bye,
bearophile
On Wed, 07 May 2014 18:51:58 +
Meta via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> On Wednesday, 7 May 2014 at 14:40:37 UTC, Jonathan M Davis via
> Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
> > My eyes... Oh, how that hurts readibily.
>
> While I agree that
>
> pure @safe @nogc nothrow
> void doSomething(int n)
> {
> }
>
62 matches
Mail list logo
