On Thursday, May 16, 2013 08:08:28 gedaiu wrote:
> Does the garbage collector manages the memory from extern(C)
> functions, or we have to delete manualy the objects created in
> those kind of functions?
The GC managase memory allocated with new or with core.memory. That's it.
Anything allocated
On Wednesday, May 15, 2013 20:48:19 Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
> On Wed, 15 May 2013 19:10:49 -0400, Timothee Cour
>
> wrote:
> > why isn't this supported?
> >
> > void main(){
> >
> > void fun();
> > void fun(int x);//Error: declaration fun is already defined
> >
> > }
>
> Don't k
On Thursday, 16 May 2013 at 06:08:30 UTC, gedaiu wrote:
Does the garbage collector manages the memory from extern(C)
functions, or we have to delete manualy the objects created in
those kind of functions?
Thanks,
Bogdan
You mean something like malloc or any kind of, for example,
derelict fu
Does the garbage collector manages the memory from extern(C)
functions, or we have to delete manualy the objects created in
those kind of functions?
Thanks,
Bogdan
On 05/08/2013 07:29 PM, H. S. Teoh wrote:
>
> No need to be embarrassed; it happens to the best of us. IME, some of
> the most frustrating, hair-pulling bugs that take hours (or days!) to
> get to the bottom of often turn out to be dead-easy trivial mistakes
> that got overlooked because they were
On Wed, 15 May 2013 19:10:49 -0400, Timothee Cour
wrote:
why isn't this supported?
void main(){
void fun();
void fun(int x);//Error: declaration fun is already defined
}
Don't know, but it hasn't been supported ever. Spec clearly states it's
not supported, but not why. I suppo
why isn't this supported?
void main(){
void fun();
void fun(int x);//Error: declaration fun is already defined
}
On Wednesday, 15 May 2013 at 15:35:05 UTC, Juan Manuel Cabo wrote:
It sounds like you need to:
1) use a Message Queue.
2) Copy the message while you work on it with the consumer,
so that you can exit the mutex.
At which point I'll suggest considering std.concurrency instead
of rollin
On Wednesday, 15 May 2013 at 20:15:26 UTC, Timothee Cour wrote:
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 12:35 PM, Namespace
wrote:
//writeln(AddressOf(B.init)); //waiting for rvalue ref,
DIP39
Did I miss something? Since when is sure that the DIP is
implemented? o.O
just wishful thinking :) actual
>
>
>
> Won't this work?
> *cast(void**)&object
>
>>
>>
great, works!
I've added it to my dtools repo:
https://github.com/timotheecour/dtools/blob/master/dtools/util/util.d#L19
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 12:35 PM, Namespace wrote:
> //writeln(AddressOf(B.init)); //waiting for rvalue ref, DIP39
>>
> Did I miss something? Since when is sure that the DIP is implemented? o.O
>
just wishful thinking :) actually this should've been:
//writeln(AddressOf(B.init^)); //wait
//writeln(AddressOf(B.init)); //waiting for rvalue ref,
DIP39
Did I miss something? Since when is sure that the DIP is
implemented? o.O
15-May-2013 23:17, Timothee Cour пишет:
>> You can insert a cast to Object first.
doesn't seem to work.
I'm trying to write a generic solution but having an innocent
'TopCast(T:int)(){return1;}' breaks it, see Error below.
doesn't seem to work.
This seems to call for a compiler solution?
Won
>> You can insert a cast to Object first.
doesn't seem to work.
I'm trying to write a generic solution but having an innocent 'T opCast(T :
int)() { return 1; }' breaks it, see Error below.
doesn't seem to work.
This seems to call for a compiler solution?
import std.stdio;
import std.conv;
v
On Wed, 15 May 2013 11:08:33 -0400, Artur Skawina
wrote:
On 05/15/13 13:04, Dicebot wrote:
On Wednesday, 15 May 2013 at 10:31:29 UTC, David wrote:
"&c" is address of reference, no class instance. I don't know if there
is a way to get a pointer to class instance in D but I am not aware
of
On 05/15/2013 08:00 PM, bearophile wrote:
> I think currently you have to use map!() to replace the tuple. Maybe am unsafe
> map-cast suffices:
Feels a bit nasty, and I have the feeling it would probably slow things down ...
? :-(
I like the zipWith idea, though I can't help but wish zip() itself
Joseph Rushton Wakeling:
If I use zip() to collate together one or more ranges, the
individual elements
get returned as a Tuple of the corresponding types.
Is there any way to get zip to label those elements, i.e. to
return e.g.
See:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8715
I thi
Hi all,
If I use zip() to collate together one or more ranges, the individual elements
get returned as a Tuple of the corresponding types.
Is there any way to get zip to label those elements, i.e. to return e.g.
Tuple!(int, "one", float, "two")
instead of
Tuple!(int, float)
..
On Wednesday, 15 May 2013 at 02:25:02 UTC, Heinz wrote:
I have this "main loop" wich is named here as my consumer
function. I didn't want this main loop to be cycling all the
time if there was nothing to do. So i needed an event object
(condition/mutex) that locked the loop until any of t
On 05/15/13 13:04, Dicebot wrote:
> On Wednesday, 15 May 2013 at 10:31:29 UTC, David wrote:
>>> "&c" is address of reference, no class instance. I don't know if there
>>> is a way to get a pointer to class instance in D but I am not aware of one.
>>
>> A simple cast to void* should do it: cast(void
On 05/15/2013 04:16 PM, ref2401 wrote:
Interface member functions can have in/out contracts but why abstract
class member functions can not?
abstract class Base
{
@property int field();
void foo() in { assert(field > 0); }
// Error: function main.Base.foo in and out contracts require
On Wednesday, 15 May 2013 at 10:31:29 UTC, David wrote:
"&c" is address of reference, no class instance. I don't know
if there
is a way to get a pointer to class instance in D but I am not
aware of one.
A simple cast to void* should do it: cast(void*)c
Is it actually defined somewhere in spe
Am 14.05.2013 14:24, schrieb Dicebot:
> On Tuesday, 14 May 2013 at 12:18:20 UTC, simendsjo wrote:
>> Very newbie question coming up :)
>>
>> How does D mark null values for classes?
>> `c is null` returns true, but `&c` isn't 0.
>> So how does D know `c is null`?
>>
>> class C {}
>> C c;
>> assert(
23 matches
Mail list logo
