On 2 March 2012 18:52, Alex Rønne Petersen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Are there any actively-maintained Cocoa bindings for D?
>
> --
> - Alex
Not as far as I know.
You should make some!
--
James Miller
Ok, got it all sorted. Thank you for the guidance.
On Friday, March 02, 2012 06:22:41 Chris Pons wrote:
> Thank you for the reply. However, I've run into another problem.
>
> I changed:
>
> ---
>
> char * file;
>
> this()
> {
> this.filename = "test.bmp";
> }
>
> ---
>
> To:
>
>
>
> char * file
>
> this
Hi,
Are there any actively-maintained Cocoa bindings for D?
--
- Alex
Thank you for the reply. However, I've run into another problem.
I changed:
---
char * file;
this()
{
this.filename = "test.bmp";
}
---
To:
char * file
this()
{
this.filename = toStringz("test.bmp");
}
---
I am getting this error:
On Friday, March 02, 2012 05:51:14 Chris Pons wrote:
> Hello,
> I am trying to work with SDL and one of their functions takes a
> char * file as a function a parameter. However, i'm running into
> trouble how to actually set this variable in my constructor.
>
> I am getting a problem where if I us
Hello,
I am trying to work with SDL and one of their functions takes a
char * file as a function a parameter. However, i'm running into
trouble how to actually set this variable in my constructor.
I am getting a problem where if I use a pointer to a char and set
it as "test.bmp" I get an erro
Unless you have an expectation that other people are already using the old
version of your branch, just use 'git push blah -f' to overwrite the old
version. It's not a big deal for patches and pull requests, but it would be
a disaster if anyone did this to the master branch.
"H. S. Teoh" wrot
On Thursday, March 01, 2012 16:00:09 Ali Çehreli wrote:
> On 03/01/2012 03:46 PM, albatroz wrote:
> > Hi Ali, just tring to define a type that holds this information. It was
> > just an attempt to create a type DateTime with the values from the known
> > strings, I thought it was possible to create
On 03/01/2012 03:46 PM, albatroz wrote:
> Hi Ali, just tring to define a type that holds this information. It was
> just an attempt to create a type DateTime with the values from the known
> strings, I thought it was possible to create the definition directly in
> the Struct, with no need for an
Are you trying to record the time when a prevEv is copied from
another one? If not, I suggest not defining this(this). It is
the postblit, to make things right for rare structs and only
when the compiler generated copying is wrong for a that type.
Or, are you just trying to define a type that
Ali:
> Note that Timon's inner foreach is a compile-time foreach, which is the
> equivalent of the following three lines:
I'd like it to be written:
static foreach (...) {...
In the meantime an annotation helps clarify the code for the person that will
read the code:
/*static*/ foreach (...) {
Am 01.03.2012 03:40, schrieb Jonathan M Davis:
On Wednesday, February 29, 2012 21:23:54 bearophile wrote:
Jonathan M Davis:
put is a function on output ranges, and Appender is an output range.
Also, given that it doesn't define ~ (and it wouldn't really make sense
for it to), it would be very
On 03/01/2012 02:25 PM, bioinfornatics wrote:
> Le jeudi 01 mars 2012 à 23:10 +0100, Timon Gehr a écrit :
>> S s;
>> size_t tokenLength = "member1".length;
>> void main(){
>> foreach(char[] line; stdin.byLine())
>> foreach(m;__traits(allMembers,S)){
>> if(line[0..tokenLength] == m)
Le jeudi 01 mars 2012 à 23:10 +0100, Timon Gehr a écrit :
> S s;
> size_t tokenLength = "member1".length;
> void main(){
> foreach(char[] line; stdin.byLine())
> foreach(m;__traits(allMembers,S)){
> if(line[0..tokenLength] == m) mixin("s."~m) =
> line[tokenLength
> .. $].idup;
>
On Thursday, March 01, 2012 15:15:00 albatroz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have defined this struct
> struct preEv {
> string edate; //010112
> string etime; //00:00:00
> string etext; //
> SysTime esystime;
> this (this) {
> SysTime esystime = SysTime(DateTime(
> Clock.currTime.year,
> to!int(this.edate[2.
On Thursday, March 01, 2012 09:17:18 H. S. Teoh wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 10:22:33AM -0500, Kevin Cox wrote:
> > When people say git encourages rewriting history. Don't listen. Once
> > you have pushed your changes to the world they are immutable. This is
> > because git uses cryptography in
On 03/01/2012 10:50 PM, bioinfornatics wrote:
dear,
Noob question for know if D provide a shorter way i explain
we have a struct S:
struct S{
string member1;
string member2;
string member3;
}
we parse a file:
File f = File("a path", "r");
S s;
sise_t tokenLength = "membe
dear,
Noob question for know if D provide a shorter way i explain
we have a struct S:
struct S{
string member1;
string member2;
string member3;
}
we parse a file:
File f = File("a path", "r");
S s;
sise_t tokenLength = "member1".length;
foreach( char[] line; f.byLine() )
OK, so what's the right way to do it then? I have some changes in a
branch, but master has been updated since, so I want to merge in the
latest updates so that the branch changes are compatible with the latest
code.
I use a quite crappy way to rebase my feature branch:
git stash && git checkout
On 03/01/2012 09:14 AM, albatroz wrote:
> Have fixed the segfault by using DateTime instead of SysTime.
>>
>> That is a separate local variable within this(this). Also, this(this)
>> is the postblit (similar to a copy constructor). Is that what you want
>> to define?
>
> No, but not using this(thi
On Mar 1, 2012 12:15 PM, "H. S. Teoh" wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 10:22:33AM -0500, Kevin Cox wrote:
> > When people say git encourages rewriting history. Don't listen. Once
> > you have pushed your changes to the world they are immutable. This is
> > because git uses cryptography intern
On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 10:22:33AM -0500, Kevin Cox wrote:
> When people say git encourages rewriting history. Don't listen. Once
> you have pushed your changes to the world they are immutable. This is
> because git uses cryptography internally and changing the history
> messes everything up. I
Have fixed the segfault by using DateTime instead of SysTime.
That is a separate local variable within this(this). Also,
this(this) is the postblit (similar to a copy constructor). Is
that what you want to define?
No, but not using this(this) will fail to build with:
static variable _initial
On 01.03.2012 19:11, H. S. Teoh wrote:
OK, so I'm new to git, and I ran into this problem:
- I forked druntime on github and made some changes in a branch
- Pushed the changes to the fork
I use the magic
pull --rebase master
instead of these 3 if I have changes but want to sync with upstream.
On 03/01/2012 03:40 AM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Wednesday, February 29, 2012 21:23:54 bearophile wrote:
Jonathan M Davis:
put is a function on output ranges, and Appender is an output range.
Also, given that it doesn't define ~ (and it wouldn't really make sense
for it to), it would be ver
On 03/01/2012 02:52 AM, Magnus Lie Hetland wrote:
> What's the preferred way of generating a random floating-point number in
> the range of a given floating-point type? We have uniform!T() for
> integral types, but nothing similar for floats? And uniform(-real.max,
> real.max) (possibly tweaking t
On 03/01/2012 06:15 AM, albatroz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have defined this struct
> struct preEv {
> string edate; //010112
> string etime; //00:00:00
> string etext; //
> SysTime esystime;
That is a member of this type.
> this (this) {
> SysTime esystime = SysTime(DateTime(
That is a separate local
When people say git encourages rewriting history. Don't listen. Once you
have pushed your changes to the world they are immutable. This is because
git uses cryptography internally and changing the history messes everything
up. If you haven't pushed you can change all of your history and it will
OK, so I'm new to git, and I ran into this problem:
- I forked druntime on github and made some changes in a branch
- Pushed the changes to the fork
- Pulled upstream commits to master
- Merged master with branch
- Ran git rebase master, so that my changes appear on top of the latest
upstream ma
Hi,
I have defined this struct
struct preEv {
string edate; //010112
string etime; //00:00:00
string etext; //
SysTime esystime;
this (this) {
SysTime esystime = SysTime(DateTime(
Clock.currTime.year,
to!int(this.edate[2..4]),
to!int(this.ed
On 2012-03-01 10:52:49 +, Magnus Lie Hetland said:
I could just use
uniform(cast(T) -1, cast(T) 1)*T.max
I guess (for some floating-point type T). Seems to work fine, at least.
Aaactually, not so much. The output here seems to get about the same
exponent as T.max. Which isn't all that
What's the preferred way of generating a random floating-point number
in the range of a given floating-point type? We have uniform!T() for
integral types, but nothing similar for floats? And uniform(-real.max,
real.max) (possibly tweaking the limits) seems to only return inf,
which isn't terrib
On Thursday, 1 March 2012 at 10:09:55 UTC, bioinfornatics wrote:
and how convert bedInstances input array to BedData11[] ?
std.array.array()
Le jeudi 01 mars 2012 à 04:36 +0100, Jesse Phillips a écrit :
> On Thursday, 1 March 2012 at 02:07:44 UTC, bioinfornatics wrote:
>
> > It is ok i have found a way maybe is not an efficient way but
> > it works:
> > https://gist.github.com/1946669
> >
> > a minor bug exist for parse track line wil
35 matches
Mail list logo
