On 29 February 2012 20:21, Jos van Uden wrote:
> On 29-2-2012 7:06, James Miller wrote:
>>
>> On 29 February 2012 18:51, jic wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Greetings!
>>>
>>> I have this program,
>>>
>>> import std.process : system;
>>> import std.stdio;
>>> int main(char[][] args)
>>> {
>>> char[] cmd;
>>>
On Wednesday, 29 February 2012 at 06:30:27 UTC, simendsjo wrote:
A strange thing is that memory consumption went _up_ when
everything was compiled as x32.
Data/code/symbols size?
On 29-2-2012 7:06, James Miller wrote:
On 29 February 2012 18:51, jic wrote:
Greetings!
I have this program,
import std.process : system;
import std.stdio;
int main(char[][] args)
{
char[] cmd;
for (int i=1;i
If you are on Windows, then I don't know why this is happening.
On window
On 29 February 2012 19:30, simendsjo wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Feb 2012 05:03:30 +0100, Mike Parker wrote:
>
>> On 2/29/2012 1:10 AM, simendsjo wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 16:58:13 +0100, Trass3r wrote:
>>>
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5570
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks. I've literal
On Wed, 29 Feb 2012 05:03:30 +0100, Mike Parker wrote:
On 2/29/2012 1:10 AM, simendsjo wrote:
On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 16:58:13 +0100, Trass3r wrote:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5570
Thanks. I've literally spent hours testing various things without any
luck - would have been
On 29 February 2012 18:51, jic wrote:
>
> Greetings!
>
> I have this program,
>
> import std.process : system;
> import std.stdio;
> int main(char[][] args)
> {
> char[] cmd;
>
> for (int i=1;i {
> cmd ~= args[i] ~ " ";
> }
> writefln(cmd);
> return(1);
> }
>
> if I compile it and run it
Greetings!
I have this program,
import std.process : system;
import std.stdio;
int main(char[][] args)
{
char[] cmd;
for (int i=1;i
On 2/29/2012 1:10 AM, simendsjo wrote:
On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 16:58:13 +0100, Trass3r wrote:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5570
Thanks. I've literally spent hours testing various things without any
luck - would have been simpler if I knew asm :/
A blocker for using x64 on linux
A blocker for using x64 on linux then.
Use gdc. Better codegen anyway.
On Tuesday, February 28, 2012 20:14:14 Matej Nanut wrote:
> So I can call any (void) method without parenthesis without -property?
> I guess I'll just add -property to all my programs from now on. But
> why isn't .peek() a property? In std.container, for example, the
> BinaryHeap has a .front prope
On Tuesday, February 28, 2012 06:56:10 Joshua Niehus wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I dont understand the following snippet's output:
>
> import std.stdio, std.traits;
> void main() {
> writeln(isSomeFunction!(writeln));
> writeln(isCallable!(writeln));
> writeln("Yes I am...");
> }
>
> /* OUTPUT */
> fals
So I can call any (void) method without parenthesis without -property?
I guess I'll just add -property to all my programs from now on. But
why isn't .peek() a property? In std.container, for example, the
BinaryHeap has a .front property (even though it isn't declared as
such on dlang.org, but the c
Also you can force property calls in your code if you compile with
-property. Property notation has not been enforced so far, but might
be in the future afaik.
On Tuesday, February 28, 2012 19:15:01 Matej Nanut wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I have the following code snippet:
>
>
> import core.time: TickDuration;
> import std.datetime: StopWatch, AutoStart;
>
>
> void main()
> {
> auto wait = TickDuration.from!`msecs`(1000);
> auto timer = StopWatch(Au
Hello everyone,
I have the following code snippet:
import core.time:TickDuration;
import std.datetime: StopWatch, AutoStart;
void main()
{
auto wait = TickDuration.from!`msecs`(1000);
auto timer = StopWatch(AutoStart.yes);
while (timer.peek < wait) // Okay.
{ }
while
On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 16:58:13 +0100, Trass3r wrote:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5570
Thanks. I've literally spent hours testing various things without any luck
- would have been simpler if I knew asm :/
A blocker for using x64 on linux then.
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5570
On 02/28/2012 05:25 AM, Mikael Lindsten wrote:
This means that
I can doif (someString.length) { ... }without worrying about the
null case (?). That's great!
Correct
I'm getting some unexpected results (crashes or random behavior) when
using a wrapped C struct in a library. I have no idea why this is
happening as everything else (including other wrapped structs) seems to
work just fine.
Could it be some alignment issues..?
extern(C):
//typedef unsigned
2012/2/28 Jesse Phillips
>
>
> string is an array, alias immutable(char)[], so the same rules apply.
>
I know about string being an alias, hence the question. This means that I
can doif (someString.length) { ... }without worrying about the null
case (?). That's great!
> There is no Null
On Tuesday, 28 February 2012 at 08:38:10 UTC, Mikael Lindsten
wrote:
Coming from the Java/C# world, not distinguishing between an
empty array
and null feels strange to me. Is this so for strings as well?
...and in
Pedros example, if you assign null to b and then try to access
b.length,
don't y
On 28.02.2012 2:17, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 02/27/2012 02:06 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> I'm not saying that dmd doesn't ever optimize switch statements. I'm
just
> saying that as I understand it, it doesn't always do so (its
performance with
> ranged case statements isn't great for instance)
Mikael Lindsten:
> Coming from the Java/C# world, not distinguishing between an empty array
> and null feels strange to me. Is this so for strings as well? ...and in
> Pedros example, if you assign null to b and then try to access b.length,
> don't you get a NullPointerException? What am I missing
2012/2/28 Pedro Lacerda
> So are a newly allocated array and a null one just the same thing?
>
> int[] a = [], b = null;
> assert(a == b);
> assert(a.length == b.length);
> assert(a.ptr == a.ptr);
>
>
Hi all,
Sorry if this is a stupid question - I'm new to D but I've been keeping
On 02/28/2012 07:27 AM, Joshua Niehus wrote:
On Tuesday, 28 February 2012 at 06:10:11 UTC, Jesse Phillips wrote:
It is a template.
I see, thanks.
And I bet its not possible to figure out if a template is a "function
template" or a "class template" etc...
You can trivially test whether the
25 matches
Mail list logo
