For the following code in D 2.0 using dmd 2.049:
import std.stdio;
abstract class foo {
protected:
void WrongType(){
assert(0,"Using wrong type");
}
public:
void Update(int value){WrongType();}
void Update(float value){WrongType();}
}
class blup :
Dr. Smith Wrote:
> Thank you. Indeed, I forgot: auto f = File("outfile.txt", "w");
>
> Interestingly, this apparently works within a for-loop to overwrite the file
> on
> the first iteration and appending otherwise (Should there not be an explicit
> append arg?):
>
> for(int i = 0; i < 100; i+
Thank you. Indeed, I forgot: auto f = File("outfile.txt", "w");
Interestingly, this apparently works within a for-loop to overwrite the file on
the first iteration and appending otherwise (Should there not be an explicit
append arg?):
for(int i = 0; i < 100; i++) {
f.writefln("%s%i", "World He
Here's a minimal little template (checked):
import std.stdio;
void main()
{
auto f = File("outfile.txt", "w");
f.writefln("%s World", "Hello");
f.close();
}
2010/10/6 Denis Koroskin <2kor...@gmail.com>
> On Wed, 06 Oct 2010 22:43:42 +0400, Dr. Smith wrote:
>
> This
On Wed, 06 Oct 2010 22:43:42 +0400, Dr. Smith wrote:
This should be trivial. However, I've not found in the documentation
(trying
both std.stdio and std.file) how to write to a file in the manner here:
filename.writefln("%s\t%f", someString, someDouble);
... this merely prints filename to
This should be trivial. However, I've not found in the documentation (trying
both std.stdio and std.file) how to write to a file in the manner here:
filename.writefln("%s\t%f", someString, someDouble);
... this merely prints filename to screen ... does not create a data file.
On Wed, 06 Oct 2010 16:57:09 +0200, Manuel König wrote:
> LLVM_LIBS=`llvm-config --libs | sed 's/-l/-L-l'`
typo detected, you need:
sed 's/-l/-L-l/g'
:)
The previous "Initial setup" description didn't pass the "copy paste"
test, now it's more instructive. The same should work for llvm 2.6 and
2.8, too (yes, 2.8 was just released and the bindings are already
there :)
Initial setup:
==
svn co http://svn.dsource.org/projects/bindings/tru
Am Wed, 6 Oct 2010 14:36:16 +0200
schrieb Manuel König :
> >
> > You should probably ask LDC guys (irc://irc.freenode.net/ldc)
>
> Thanks, I'll try. But I think the development of LDC was put on hold
> due to lack of time and interest, let's see if I can find someone
> there :)
>
Well, the cha
Am Wed, 06 Oct 2010 16:27:11 +0400
schrieb "Denis Koroskin" <2kor...@gmail.com>:
> On Wed, 06 Oct 2010 16:20:41 +0400, Manuel König
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > did anyone have success using the llvm-2.7 D-bindings from the
> > bindings project http://www.dsource.org/projects/bindings on x86_64
>
On Wed, 06 Oct 2010 08:21:08 -0400, Lars T. Kyllingstad
wrote:
On Wed, 06 Oct 2010 07:39:48 -0400, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
Of course. If you realize that the expression [1,2,3] is not immutable,
then it makes sense.
Another example to help you think about it:
void foo(int x)
{
imm
On Wed, 06 Oct 2010 16:20:41 +0400, Manuel König wrote:
Hi,
did anyone have success using the llvm-2.7 D-bindings from the bindings
project http://www.dsource.org/projects/bindings on x86_64 linux? I
tried so far with ldc, but the compiler chokes about a mere 3570 lines
of unresolved symbols w
On Wed, 06 Oct 2010 16:21:08 +0400, Lars T. Kyllingstad
wrote:
On Wed, 06 Oct 2010 07:39:48 -0400, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Wed, 06 Oct 2010 06:16:45 -0400, Lars T. Kyllingstad
wrote:
[...]
Secondly, if the above is not true, how can I verify that the array in
the following piece
On Wed, 06 Oct 2010 07:39:48 -0400, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
> On Wed, 06 Oct 2010 06:16:45 -0400, Lars T. Kyllingstad
> wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>> Secondly, if the above is not true, how can I verify that the array in
>> the following piece of code isn't allocated and/or copied anew every
>> tim
Hi,
did anyone have success using the llvm-2.7 D-bindings from the bindings
project http://www.dsource.org/projects/bindings on x86_64 linux? I
tried so far with ldc, but the compiler chokes about a mere 3570 lines
of unresolved symbols when linking with ldc, compiling works fine.
Short version:
On Wed, 06 Oct 2010 08:12:28 -0400, bearophile
wrote:
Steven Schveighoffer:
Casting to immutable is the only way to create such a beast.
Then maybe we have to improve the language semantics to allow a better
solution. See the Transients of Clojure or the larval objects of Java :-)
The
Steven Schveighoffer:
> Casting to immutable is the only way to create such a beast.
Then maybe we have to improve the language semantics to allow a better
solution. See the Transients of Clojure or the larval objects of Java :-)
The compiler may need to test (at compile time) that there's only
On Wed, 06 Oct 2010 15:39:48 +0400, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
BTW, I'm all for making array literals immutable. You can always make
runtime-allocated arrays via a library function.
-Steve
I second that!
On Wed, 06 Oct 2010 06:16:45 -0400, Lars T. Kyllingstad
wrote:
I have a program that uses an immutable array, the contents of which are
known at compile time. Thus, ideally, I want it to be placed in
the .rodata segment of the program.
Firstly, I seem to remember reading that using an array
On Tue, 05 Oct 2010 22:02:30 -0400, bearophile
wrote:
Denis Koroskin:
Compute mutable copy and then cast to immutable. Am I missing something?
That's possible. But it's an exceptionally dirty thing, I am not sure it
works in SafeD. A well designed const system has to offer a more clean
On Wed, 06 Oct 2010 10:16:45 +, Lars T. Kyllingstad wrote:
> static immutable int[3] = [1, 2, 3];
..should of course be
static immutable int[3] a = [1, 2, 3];
-Lars
I have a program that uses an immutable array, the contents of which are
known at compile time. Thus, ideally, I want it to be placed in
the .rodata segment of the program.
Firstly, I seem to remember reading that using an array literal in D will
always result in a heap allocation. Is this co
On Tue, 05 Oct 2010 23:25:36 +0200, vano wrote:
> The code below:
> module used;
>
> import std.stdio;
>
> class ClassA {
> this() { writeln("A ctor"); }
> ~this() { writeln("A dtor"); }
> }
>
> static this() { writeln("used.sctor"); } static ~this()
23 matches
Mail list logo
