CB uses the Scintilla editing component, which is the one used by Scite (which
I'm using atm). Scite was missing quite a bit of keywords, so I've added some
of them.
I just did a comparison, and it seems they're both missing a bunch of keywords.
A fun thing to do is open CB and Scite side-by-si
Philippe Sigaud wrote:
I have an impression that
syntax error is in order. Putting in second array and attempting
similar initialization without commas leads to one. I've only tried
it with Windows 2.048, though I think the front end would eat this
on Linux too. Is this valid,
Philippe Sigaud:
> But in the same way that you cannot always convert T[] into T[3], how could
> you convert a Tensor!(int,2) (2D, runtime dims) into a Matrix!(int,4,4)?
> (2D, CT dim: 4*4)
The conversion functions are written by you, so you can all things you want
(with just few runtime tests).
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 23:49, Stanislav Blinov
wrote:
> struct S(T,size_t N)
> {
>T[N] arr;
>int foo;// type doesn't seem to matter here,
>// taking int for clarity
>
>static immutable S C1 = { initializeWith!(T,N)(0) 5 };
>// No
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 22:41, bearophile wrote:
> Philippe Sigaud:
> > What you lose is the CT checking that can be done for multiplication or
> > additions if all dimensions are exposed in the type.
>
> If you want, you may create a second nD array struct where sizes too are CT
> values, plus t
Philippe Sigaud wrote:
That beats hell out of my clumsy templates :)
Your templates are not clumsy, it's typically the way some other PL
would process lists/arrays. I used to write a lot of these. But 6 months
ago, CTFE got seven-leagues boots and right now it's much easier on the
eye to us
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 14:11, Stanislav Blinov wrote:
> Sorry, I pressed the wrong button so the message was sent to your email.
> Reciting:
>
>
> Does that work for you?
>>
>> Yes! Beautiful, thanks! That beats hell out of my clumsy templates :)
>
Your templates are not clumsy, it's typicall
Philippe Sigaud:
> What you lose is the CT checking that can be done for multiplication or
> additions if all dimensions are exposed in the type.
If you want, you may create a second nD array struct where sizes too are CT
values, plus two methods/free functions to convert between the two array ty
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 15:24, Bob Cowdery wrote:
> I might be on my way :-) .
>
> Good :) I just skimmed through the thread, so I don't know if you're still
using Code::Blocks.
I'm using it, and it highlights D code with no problem. For 10.05, it's in
Settings > Editor > Syntax Highlighting > sy
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 03:50, bearophile wrote:
> Jason Spencer:
> > Knowing just the # of dimensions won't tell me
> > the total size or how to index. I need the size of each dimension.
>
> If you create such structs, you do what you want, so it represents a nD
> rectangular array. The total s
I'll look it up. I'm trying ddbg, and although it is working so far,
there has to be something better (At least giving it commands and
breakpoints)
Isn't ddbg dead?
Your best shot is to debug on Windows using cv2pdb or the upcoming Mago
Debugger plugin with Visual Studio.
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 17:27, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
> What would be really cool is if we had a property that returned a random
> value of any integrated type. And for user-defined types, maybe it would
> call a method with a special name. I guess one could make a template
> function that would d
== Quote from Trass3r (u...@known.com)'s article
> You could try cv2pdb.
I'll look it up. I'm trying ddbg, and although it is working so far, there has
to be something better (At least giving it commands and breakpoints)
Sorry, I pressed the wrong button so the message was sent to your
email. Reciting:
26.08.2010 1:53, Philippe Sigaud wrote:
I came up with the templates in my initial post. They seem to
work, but I doubt those are legal solutions.
.
If they work, then they are legal :)
How i
You could try cv2pdb.
On Wednesday 25 August 2010 23:49:27 Yao G. wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Aug 2010 01:46:02 -0500, Jonathan M Davis
>
> wrote:
> > Look at http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/operatoroverloading.html (or
> > even
> > better, TDPL). The correct function would be opOpAssign. I believe that
> > the
> > syntax fo
I'm using dmd v2.048, WinDbg 5.1.
I seem to be having trouble, perhaps i can get this cleared up. I'm trying to
build a new structure type using math overloads (for testing). My asserts are
failing; i need to debug them but can't. I've run 'dmd -gc mysource.d' as per
the site, neither gdb
bearophile wrote:
Don:
Do you know what cast(ulong) is doing here?
Turning it from a signalling nan to a quiet nan.
I really really didn't know this. Is this written somewhere in the D docs? :-)
It's the way signalling nans work. _Any_ use of them raises a floating
point exception, then tu
18 matches
Mail list logo
