John C Wrote:
> Ivan Boritsky wrote:
> > i work on a win32 application. i try to access my web camera.
> > when i use this api funtion;
> > capCreateCaptureWindow("cam", WS_VISIBLE + WS_CHILD, 10, 10,266, 252, hWnd,
> > 0);
>
> That should be: WS_VISIBLE | WS_CHILD.
>
> >
> > i get this error:
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 4:52 PM, Rory McGuire wrote:
> Here is some code I wrote which enables wrapping a proxy around an object.
> I am using it for my serialization library. It works in D1(1.046) and D2
> (2.031)
>
> Posting it here for reference by all before I add to much of the stuff
> specifi
Here is some code I wrote which enables wrapping a proxy around an object.
I am using it for my serialization library. It works in D1(1.046) and D2
(2.031)
Posting it here for reference by all before I add to much of the stuff
specific to my use, should make it easier to follow.
usage: new Proxy
Tue, 11 Aug 2009 19:35:40 -0400, Jesse Phillips wrote:
> I am trying to obtain a rang that is the intersection of two other ranges. To
> do this I am using the _setIntersection()_ function.
>
> import std.algorithm;
> import std.stdio;
>
> struct S {
> string label;
> }
>
Jesse Phillips Wrote:
> Steven Schveighoffer Wrote:
>
> > You did not define a way to compare two S structs. Try redefining S like
> > this:
> >
> > struct S {
> >string label;
> >int opCmp(ref const S s2) const {
> > if(label < s2.label)
> > return -1;
> > if(labe
thank u very much. it works fine.
Ali Cehreli wrote:
Don Wrote:
void main()
{
int[2] static_0 = [ 1, 1 ];
int[2] static_1 = [ 1:1 ];
}
dmd: init.c:431: virtual Expression* ArrayInitializer::toExpression(): Assertion
`j < edim' failed.
I've added this to Bugzilla as bug 3246. With a patch .
Thank you for the quick f
filed
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3248
On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 13:00:22 -0400, funog wrote:
Is there a way to make the current thread sleep for a given amount of
time, while having the possibility of another thread "waking it up"
earlier?
Create a mutex/condition pair, then have one thread wait on the condition
with a timeout.
On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 12:41:20 -0400, Ali Cehreli wrote:
Steven Schveighoffer Wrote:
> int[] a = [ 0, 1, 2 ];
> a[0] = 42;
No, it's a mutable array. It's one of the quirks of D2 that bugs me. A
string literal is an immutable array but a normal array literal actually
allocates new s
Is there a way to make the current thread sleep for a given amount of time,
while having the possibility of another thread "waking it up" earlier?
Steven Schveighoffer Wrote:
> > int[] a = [ 0, 1, 2 ];
> > a[0] = 42;
> No, it's a mutable array. It's one of the quirks of D2 that bugs me. A
> string literal is an immutable array but a normal array literal actually
> allocates new space on the heap for the array every time you us
Reply to Saaa,
"Lars T. Kyllingstad" wrote in message
news:h5tsuu$bc...@digitalmars.com...
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/
I always thought bugzilla was only for bugs..
IIRC when it was set up there was a bit of debate about that and items in
it got changed from "bugs" to "issues" to den
Steven Schveighoffer Wrote:
> You did not define a way to compare two S structs. Try redefining S like
> this:
>
> struct S {
>string label;
>int opCmp(ref const S s2) const {
> if(label < s2.label)
> return -1;
> if(label > s2.label)
> return 1;
> ret
Don Wrote:
> > void main()
> > {
> > int[2] static_0 = [ 1, 1 ];
> > int[2] static_1 = [ 1:1 ];
> > }
> >
> > dmd: init.c:431: virtual Expression* ArrayInitializer::toExpression():
> > Assertion `j < edim' failed.
>
> I've added this to Bugzilla as bug 3246. With a patch .
Thank you fo
On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 11:25:10 -0400, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
I think it's expecting dynamc arrays, not static ones. Auto is making
them static.
BTW, this probably should not be true, I would guess that static arrays
should be intersectable, of course the return type would have to b
On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 19:35:40 -0400, Jesse Phillips
wrote:
I am trying to obtain a rang that is the intersection of two other
ranges. To do this I am using the _setIntersection()_ function.
import std.algorithm;
import std.stdio;
struct S {
string label;
}
void
On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 19:05:56 -0400, Ali Cehreli wrote:
Does the expression [ 0, 1, 2 ] form an immutable array? If so, is the
assignment to a[0] undefined below? Is it trying to modify an immutable
element?
int[] a = [ 0, 1, 2 ];
a[0] = 42;
The reason for my thinking that [ 0, 1,
Saaa wrote:
"Lars T. Kyllingstad" wrote in message
news:h5tsuu$bc...@digitalmars.com...
Saaa wrote:
Some time ago I requested something on .D, but it was ignored.
I'm interested in why this is so.
It was only a small request, maybe not fitting for .D but dsourse/phobos
said that was the place
"Lars T. Kyllingstad" wrote in message
news:h5tsuu$bc...@digitalmars.com...
> Saaa wrote:
>> Some time ago I requested something on .D, but it was ignored.
>> I'm interested in why this is so.
>> It was only a small request, maybe not fitting for .D but dsourse/phobos
>> said that was the place
Ali Cehreli wrote:
Lars T. Kyllingstad Wrote:
I've tried with DMD 2.031, and I can't reproduce this. This works fine
for me:
int[2] static_0 = [ 1, 1 ]:
int[2] static_1 = [ 1:1 ];
Where did you put the declarations? I've tried putting them at both
module level and in a class, and both
Ali Cehreli wrote:
Lars T. Kyllingstad Wrote:
I've tried with DMD 2.031, and I can't reproduce this. This works fine
for me:
int[2] static_0 = [ 1, 1 ]:
int[2] static_1 = [ 1:1 ];
Where did you put the declarations? I've tried putting them at both
module level and in a class, and both
Ali Cehreli wrote:
Lars T. Kyllingstad Wrote:
I've tried with DMD 2.031, and I can't reproduce this. This works fine
for me:
int[2] static_0 = [ 1, 1 ]:
int[2] static_1 = [ 1:1 ];
Where did you put the declarations? I've tried putting them at both
module level and in a class, and both
Lars T. Kyllingstad Wrote:
> I've tried with DMD 2.031, and I can't reproduce this. This works fine
> for me:
>
>int[2] static_0 = [ 1, 1 ]:
>int[2] static_1 = [ 1:1 ];
>
> Where did you put the declarations? I've tried putting them at both
> module level and in a class, and both times
Ivan Boritsky wrote:
i work on a win32 application. i try to access my web camera.
when i use this api funtion;
capCreateCaptureWindow("cam", WS_VISIBLE + WS_CHILD, 10, 10,266, 252, hWnd, 0);
That should be: WS_VISIBLE | WS_CHILD.
i get this error:
Error: undefined identifier capCreateCaptur
Ellery Newcomer wrote:
Why is function overloading not applied to nested functions?
Good question. Intuitively it seems to me that they should act just like
other functions. I couldn't find anything about it in the spec, but I
found this (on the "Functions" page):
Unlike module level d
Saaa wrote:
Some time ago I requested something on .D, but it was ignored.
I'm interested in why this is so.
It was only a small request, maybe not fitting for .D but dsourse/phobos
said that was the place for such things.
(Maybe it was unintelligible again?)
The place (.D) was right, but I t
Ali Cehreli wrote:
Does the expression [ 0, 1, 2 ] form an immutable array? If so, is the
assignment to a[0] undefined below? Is it trying to modify an immutable element?
int[] a = [ 0, 1, 2 ];
a[0] = 42;
The reason for my thinking that [ 0, 1, 2] is an array is because it has the
.du
Ali Cehreli wrote:
The 'static' keyword is required by dmd 2.031 for the second of these two
definitions:
int[2] static_0 = [ 1, 1 ];
static int[2] static_1 = [ 1:1 ];
Is this inconsistency by design? Should 'static' be required for both or
neither?
Ali
I've tried with DMD 2.031, and
29 matches
Mail list logo
