Re: Changing the default font

2004-06-16 Thread RittervomNie
Hi there, double-clicking pops up some default properties dialog but there's no field for setting default fonts (esp. UML elements like associations, messages, classes, not even in 0.93). As a basic enhancement properties like fonts should be organized tree-like. The diagram always gives some

UML-Conformity

2004-06-16 Thread RittervomNie
To enhance the standard UML components a class should have a checkbox "Interface" to produce a dashed outline. It is not easy to create a class-like shape containing methods and attributes, stereotypes and that. For sequence diagrams a message should be a zig zag line, so it's possible to draw

Re: UML-Conformity

2004-06-16 Thread RittervomNie
Am Donnerstag, 17. Juni 2004 03:02 schrieb Andrew Ross: > On Thu, 2004-06-17 at 04:01, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > To enhance the standard UML components a class should have a checkbox > > "Interface" to produce a dashed outline. It is not easy to create a > > class-like shape containing methods a

An oft-wished for feature: Heirarchical diagrams. Suggestions welcome.

2004-06-17 Thread RittervomNie
Just include diagram nodes into a container figure, calculate it's bounds and draw some rectangle 'round it. little textbox attached to one of the upper corners and thats it. Extend context menus of diagram nodes (nodes in graph theory, classes, use cases, messages, no associations) by "Add to [

Re: UML-Conformity

2004-06-17 Thread RittervomNie
Am Donnerstag, 17. Juni 2004 12:38 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > > Am Donnerstag, 17. Juni 2004 03:02 schrieb Andrew Ross: > >> On Thu, 2004-06-17 at 04:01, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> > To enhance the standard UML components a class should have a checkbox > >> > "Interface" to produce a dashed ou

Re: UML-Conformity

2004-06-18 Thread RittervomNie
Am Freitag, 18. Juni 2004 02:58 schrieb Andrew Ross: > On Fri, 2004-06-18 at 02:52, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > >> I wouldn't switch it off, since that would no doubt result in a bug > > > >> filed to have it added as a feature, even though it's already there > > > >> (although it could do with

Re: UML-Conformity

2004-06-23 Thread RittervomNie
Am Montag, 21. Juni 2004 23:51 schrieb Luc Pionchon: > > I'd like to take part in this and develop some solutions > > (already coded some UML-Tools, esp. sequence diagrams) > > but I took a look at the lines of code, the object structure > > and missed some of the easy Java object strategy. > > Qui

Documentation, PDF, "There was an error processing the page"

2004-06-30 Thread RittervomNie
Hi there, after reviewing some code I'll have to say: Not for me, not yet :-) But freshing up documentation could be an easy way to get involved with dia. When reading the PDF the error "There was an error processing the page. Objects have the wrong type" occured. Something is wrong with the se

Re: Documentation, PDF, "There was an error processing the page"

2004-06-30 Thread RittervomNie
Am Mittwoch, 30. Juni 2004 10:17 schrieb Cyrille Chepelov: > > It's not totally clear to me in what you wrote, but may I assume that > you are going to keep the source documentation format in DocBook format? > While I could never figure out how to keep a DocBook rendering chain in > operating condi

Re: Is there a local shape directory?

2004-06-30 Thread RittervomNie
Am Mittwoch, 30. Juni 2004 15:31 schrieb Marc Haber: > Hi, > > I have modified the switch shape to have more connectors, and would > now like to include that shape in my local dia installation. It works > fine when I put the shape directly besides the other shapes, but I'd > like to have a local di

Re: Is there a local shape directory?

2004-06-30 Thread RittervomNie
Am Mittwoch, 30. Juni 2004 17:56 schrieb Alan Horkan: [...] > > > > (rtfm=read the f*** manual *g*) > > Please dont do that. > > Nobody likes being told to RTFM, > it is not polite in any language. Only RTM? > > A polite reply without that last remark would have taken less time to > write. > > Re

Re: Asked before, now again with more questions attached

2004-09-09 Thread RittervomNie
Am Donnerstag, 9. September 2004 17:10 schrieb Jim Clark: > I wonder if there is some way to specify the place or item on which the > alignment tool works. What I mean is this; I have a box where I want it, > and I want to align another box with the first one. If I choose Center (my > usual choice)

Re: Asked before, now again with more questions attached

2004-09-09 Thread RittervomNie
Am Freitag, 10. September 2004 04:43 schrieb Octavio Alvarez Piza: > Hi, all. This is my first post to the list. > > > Am Donnerstag, 9. September 2004 17:10 schrieb Jim Clark: > >> If I choose Center (my > >> usual choice) it aligns them against some intermediate, self-determined > >> meridian. I

Re: Asked before, now again with more questions attached

2004-09-12 Thread RittervomNie
Am Freitag, 10. September 2004 19:59 schrieb Octavio Alvarez Piza: > > Am Freitag, 10. September 2004 04:43 schrieb Octavio Alvarez Piza: > >> > Am Donnerstag, 9. September 2004 17:10 schrieb Jim Clark: > >> >> If I choose Center (my usual choice) it aligns them against some > >> >> intermediate, s

Re: Re-phrase

2005-01-30 Thread RittervomNie
Sam Post schrieb: [...] Any ideas? I'd like to be able to use Dia to make an image, then run a simple script that reads the dia/svg file and outputs html for a clickable image map. The problem is, dia's coordinate system is in centimeters and I can't figure out how to get this into pixels, which is

Re: Feedback wanted: Autogap and mainpoints

2005-08-01 Thread RittervomNie
Lars Clausen schrieb: 1. With autograb, make moving the whole line not do autograb. Only when the end of the line is moved is there autograb. mkay 2. With autograb, make lines with all ends entirely contained within an object not do autograb on that object. mkay 3. With autograb, if moving

Re: Feedback wanted: Autogap and mainpoints

2005-08-02 Thread RittervomNie
Lars Clausen schrieb: On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 08:13 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think the direction, from where I entered is important, to determine the connection point, but I think you already thought 'bout that. Thanks for the feedback! No, the direction from where the user drags the