I am very new to Dia. I am looking for linux progs which can do UML..
and Dia looked like it was working fine, until I tried to print.
The text in my class, both attribute and method, overran the border of
my class box.
--
| Class|
| -
> I am very new to Dia. I am looking for linux progs which can do UML..
> and Dia looked like it was working fine, until I tried to print.
>
> The text in my class, both attribute and method, overran the border of
> my class box.
>
> --
> | Class
I need to know if my email is getting through.. someone please respond
if you see this.
-John
___
Dia-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/dia-list
Now that I am sure my email messages are getting through to this list.
:-) Would anyone have a solution to this dilemma?
And please.. if the answer is: no, we have never seen this problem
before.. let me know! :-)
Thanks!
-John
>
>> When I try to print, the text in my class, both attribute
>
>
>
>I remember having this kind of problem long time ago. It stems from the
>GTK fonts not having the same width as the actual PostScript fonts. As you
>may see in other mails on the list, the GTK font widths are generally
>screwy. We've tried to hack around it, but with little luck.
>
>Whic
>
>
>
>No, the desktop manager just manages your desktop (hence the name:). Dia
>uses GTK for its user interface, which is not easily changed.
>
>Still, I am not seeing that problem even when I run 0.88.1. Can you send a
>diagram that shows this behaviour (if you don't want the list to see any
>
Lars Clausen wrote:
>
>I remember having this kind of problem long time ago. It stems from the
>GTK fonts not having the same width as the actual PostScript fonts. As you
>may see in other mails on the list, the GTK font widths are generally
>screwy. We've tried to hack around it, but with lit
I am trying to make a sequence diagram in Dia, but am having a hard time
find where to create additional control boxes.
Object
-
|
|
|
|
|
|--# This one appears with the lifeline object
| |--->
| |
|
Torben H. Nielsen wrote:
>Good question!
>
>Maybe the lower handle should be a connection point instead - so it
>could be possible to make a chain of lifelines.
>
>Torben
>
I had just thought of that after my post and tried it out, to no avail. :-)
-John