On Fri, Aug 30, 2002 at 04:03:28PM +0200, Christof Petig wrote:
>[Summary: Cygwin is good to compile programs on win32 with minimal
>porting effort, but a stable port should use MinGW]
Summary: If you want to ignore all of the work that has gone into
-mno-cygwin to make it work reliably, then us
On Fri, Aug 30, 2002 at 01:34:58PM -0700, James Michael DuPont wrote:
>
>--- Christopher Faylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 30, 2002 at 04:03:28PM +0200, Christof Petig wrote:
>> >[Summary: Cygwin is good to compile programs on win32 with minimal
>&
On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 08:45:14AM +0200, Christof Petig wrote:
>Christopher Faylor schrieb:
>>On Fri, Aug 30, 2002 at 04:03:28PM +0200, Christof Petig wrote:
>>
>>>[Summary: Cygwin is good to compile programs on win32 with minimal
>>>porting effort, but a s
On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 03:17:37PM -0400, Earnie Boyd wrote:
>Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>Anyway, I've gone to some considerable effort to improve -mno-cygwin.
>>No reason for you to believe me but there's also no reason for you to
>>continue to misrepresent the st
