Re: state of anon CVS of dia

2004-05-14 Thread Andrew Ross
On Fri, 2004-05-14 at 18:15, W. Borgert wrote: > Things become worse. The following links from the dia > homepage http://www.gnome.org/projects/dia/ are broken: > > http://cvs.gnome.org/bonsai/rview.cgi?cvsroot=/cvs/gnome&dir=dia > http://cvs.gnome.org/lxr/source/dia/ > http://cvs.gnome.org/bonsa

UML class multiplicity

2004-05-04 Thread Andrew Ross
Hi all, I have just started using Dia after reacting rather badly to our lecturer's suggestion to use Visio for our UML diagrams :-) Most things are working, but I've been unable to set class multiplicity - is dia capable of this? My gut feeling is no, as I've checked the website, mailing list ar

Re: ./configure --with-python

2004-05-06 Thread Andrew Ross
On Fri, 2004-05-07 at 00:23, W. Borgert wrote: > Quoting Roland Stigge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > checking local Python configuration... checking for script directory... > > NONE/lib/python2.3/site-packages > > checking for extension module directory... > > NONE/lib/python2.3/site-packages > > look

Re: UML-Conformity

2004-06-16 Thread Andrew Ross
On Thu, 2004-06-17 at 04:01, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > To enhance the standard UML components a class should have a checkbox > "Interface" to produce a dashed outline. It is not easy to create a > class-like shape containing methods and attributes, stereotypes and that. What version of UML are

Re: UML-Conformity

2004-06-17 Thread Andrew Ross
On Fri, 2004-06-18 at 02:52, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > >> I wouldn't switch it off, since that would no doubt result in a bug > > >> filed to have it added as a feature, even though it's already there > > >> (although it could do with some improvement). There is already a bug or > > >> two filed

Re: UML-Conformity

2004-06-18 Thread Andrew Ross
On Sat, 2004-06-19 at 02:51, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Why would you need the text element, when the only issue with > > multiplicities, roles, message names etc is their poor automatic > > placement? The two bugs I previously mentioned (65430 and 118313) raise > > two different approaches to so

updating homepage listed on mail.gnome.org

2004-07-09 Thread Andrew Ross
I wasn't sure if this should be posted here, sent to the devs directly (I'm guessing not), or sent to the mail.gnome.org admins. The website for dia-list subscription (http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/dia-list) still lists the old homepage (http://www.lysator.liu.se/~alla/dia), instead of th

maintaining ratio during object resizing

2004-07-09 Thread Andrew Ross
Just wondering how many people would find it useful if Dia included support for maintaining an object's height/width ratio during resizing? I'm talking about the behaviour seen in many editors (eg. Photoshop) when resizing while holding down the shift key. The only semi-related entry in Bugzilla

Re: maintaining ratio during object resizing

2004-07-10 Thread Andrew Ross
On Fri, 2004-07-09 at 23:55, Alan Horkan wrote: > > support for maintaining an object's height/width ratio during resizing? > > I'm talking about the behaviour seen in many editors (eg. Photoshop) > > when resizing while holding down the shift key. > > > > The only semi-related entry in Bugzilla is

Re: Prerelease of 0.94 is out

2004-07-10 Thread Andrew Ross
On Sat, 2004-07-10 at 16:24, Lars Clausen wrote: > On Fri, 2004-07-09 at 23:49, Alan Horkan wrote: > > hoping i can get a quick answer ... > > > > would you expect 0.94 to work with a fairly stock setup of Fedora Core 2? > > > > either way I'll be trying it later but as I have to burn the files t

Re: Prerelease of 0.94 is out

2004-07-10 Thread Andrew Ross
On Sat, 2004-07-10 at 22:46, Lars Clausen wrote: > On Sat, 2004-07-10 at 12:54, Andrew Ross wrote: > > > > Should python and python-xml/pyxml be listed as build time dependencies? > > I couldn't find any mention of them in INSTALL, but they are required by > > she

auotmatically marking binaries in CVS

2004-07-17 Thread Andrew Ross
On Sun, 2004-07-18 at 07:39, Hans Breuer wrote: > Also *please* add png as binary - otherwise they'll not be arriving as > valid png on the windoze site. To fix it afterwards use 'cvs admin -kb > *.png' as mentioned in the ChangeLog (Now that *was* complaining ;) Perhaps it would be easiest to h

keybindings in dia-0.93 on Gentoo Linux

2004-07-19 Thread Andrew Ross
On Tue, 2004-07-20 at 02:28, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Sat, Jul 17, 2004 at 06:37:31PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > On Sat, Jul 17, 2004 at 08:42:47AM +0200, Lars Clausen wrote: > > > On Fri, 2004-07-16 at 19:57, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > If you are looking into keybindings a

Re: For packagers [Was: keybindings in dia-0.93 on Gentoo Linux]

2004-07-19 Thread Andrew Ross
On Tue, 2004-07-20 at 15:13, Lars Clausen wrote: > On Tue, 2004-07-20 at 01:45, Andrew Ross wrote: > > > > Gtrl-G and Shift-Ctrl-G work fine here (0.93 ebuild). I've made a push > > for 0.93 to be marked stable: > > > > http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cg

Re: draw text with arrows

2004-07-21 Thread Andrew Ross
On Wed, 2004-07-21 at 17:19, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I'm trying to draw a flowchart using Dia. In Visio, when I draw an arrow I > can put text on top of the arrow. Can I also do the same with Dia? Thanks! Draw your arrow (really just a line with the endpoint set to arrowhead) and then use the

Re: UML Export or transform to XMI?

2004-08-19 Thread Andrew Ross
On Fri, 2004-08-20 at 05:20, Jeff Kowalczyk wrote: > This is a dia feature request, or a request for anyone who has an existing > hack that can get the job done. > > Need: Convert dia UML diagram to XMI format. Save as format or python/XSLT > transforming script, either one would be great. Intere

Re: Another newbie question time

2004-08-23 Thread Andrew Ross
On Tue, 2004-08-24 at 08:42, Jim Clark wrote: > http://www.llywelyn.net/png.html > > I put a simple image of what I'd like to do on my web site. I'm sure > there is a lot I don't understand about that zigzag line Create a zig zag line which goes left, down, left (see attachment 1a.dia).

Re: troubles compiling.

2004-08-29 Thread Andrew Ross
On Mon, 2004-08-30 at 06:46, whitty reeve wrote: > Simple logic could have figured out all your questions. I wonder if I'm the only one who thought this email to be quite rude. > OS: obvious, by the > fact that i'm compiling it, it would be a *nix, now, that we have singled it > down to a bsd