On Tue, 31 Jan 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > You'll have to find some way of managing interem bugfix releases if
> > > non-developers are going to keep using dia.
...
> > > It is a wonderful tool, but I cannot wait a year for brickwall bugs
> > > to get fixed. Even if there are new minor bug
[EMAIL PROTECTED] sagde:
>
> -- Timothy Bogie
>
>
> Original Message
>> From: Octavio Alvarez Piza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Sent: Monday, 30 January 2006 6:38 PM
>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], discussions about usage and development of dia
>>
>> Subject: Re: Dia-0.95
>>
>> On Mon, 30 Ja
On Tue, 31 Jan 2006, Lars Clausen wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] sagde:
> >
> > -- Timothy Bogie
> >
> >
> > Original Message
> >> From: Octavio Alvarez Piza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> Sent: Monday, 30 January 2006 6:38 PM
> >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], discussions about usage and develop
Probably mostly to keep myself in check, I'm declaring feature freeze
for version 0.95. So pending resolution of remaining important bugs, we
can start the release cycle. Hans, are there any other than the three
critical level bugs that you think should be fixed?
-Lars
--
Lars Clausen ([EMAIL
On Tue, 2006-01-31 at 20:11 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> It's probably old news, but I was able to reproduce this one
>
> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=163574
>
> using 0.94 and following the steps in the report, i.e.
>
> 1. start dia
> 2. add a digitizing board from the n
On Tue, 2006-01-31 at 12:33 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Jan 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > > > You'll have to find some way of managing interem bugfix releases if
> > > > non-developers are going to keep using dia.
> ...
> > > > It is a wonderful tool, but I cannot wait a yea
