Hi,
looking for a nice uml design tool for linux I encoutered dia, which is part
of the SuSE distribution.
I noticed that oparations with lots of parameters make class objects look far
too wide, messing up the design of uml class diagrams. I needed to wrap long
lines of operations. It seemed tha
Hello,
sorry for my english I'm French :p
when I save a diagram with the format .shape
the properties of the objects which aren't displayed on the diagram, aren't
saved in the file.
Are these properties saved somewhere ?
Or there is a format that allow to save also the properties not visible i
At 14:14 14.05.04, Lars Clausen wrote:
On Thu, 2004-05-13 at 22:15, Federico Maggi wrote:
> hi,
> I am sorry if some similar post already exists.
>
There were many posts, but none of them had such a misleading subject yet ;)
[For me "are no longer readable" sounds like a much more serious pro
I would like to have a diagram which becomes visible, gradually in a
series of steps. For example, I cover cryptographic
network protocols in my security course, and I'd like to have each
message appear separately on my slides.
Is there some way of doing this that does not require
Le Mon, May 17, 2004, Ã 08:53:50AM -0500, Jon A. Solworth a écrit:
> I would like to have a diagram which becomes visible, gradually in a
> series of steps. For example, I cover cryptographic
> network protocols in my security course, and I'd like to have each
> message appear separately on
On Mon, 2004-05-17 at 08:58, Cyrille Chepelov wrote:
> hide the layers you don't want, export. Hide layer N, show layer N+1,
> export again. Repeat.
>
> Works for me with PNG.
>
> -- Cyrille
Cyrille,
Certainly if that works for PNG, it should work for any
of the output filters.
Le Mon, May 17, 2004, Ã 09:13:24AM -0500, Jon A. Solworth a écrit:
> Certainly if that works for PNG, it should work for any
> of the output filters.
"hopefully". If you can get the same procedure to work on another
exporter, such as SVG, I'd be closer to be willing to say "certainly".
>
On Mon, 2004-05-17 at 15:19, Hans Breuer wrote:
> At 14:14 14.05.04, Lars Clausen wrote:
> >On Thu, 2004-05-13 at 22:15, Federico Maggi wrote:
> > > hi,
> > > I am sorry if some similar post already exists.
> > >
>
> There were many posts, but none of them had such a misleading subject yet ;