Hello,
I would like to create new programmed objects like the UML objects with
properties more efficient.
This page describes how to do a programmed object:
http://faemalia.org/wiki/view/Technical/ProgrammedObject
Does a programmed object have to follow this way obligatorily ?
Is that a good w
Hello !
Sorry for my english, I'm french.
I would like to create links between objects which are on different layers.
But it is difficult to understand sources because they are not commented.
Have you methods to suggest me to do it? Files concerned?
Is it really possible to implement this functio
Hello !
Sorry for my english, I'm french.
I would like to create links between objects which are on different layers.
But it is difficult to understand sources because they are not commented.
Have you methods to suggest me to do it? Files concerned?
Is it really possible to implement this funct
Le Wed, May 05, 2004, Ã 12:02:13PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit:
> Hello !
> Sorry for my english, I'm french.
Heh, no problem. You're fairly understandable (or maybe my French
neurons are automatically filling the gaps that the the (more recently
trained) English neurons left ;-) )
> I woul
Le Wed, May 05, 2004, Ã 11:56:29AM +0200, Alexandre Fen-Chong a écrit:
> Hello,
>
> I would like to create new programmed objects like the UML objects with
> properties more efficient.
What do you mean by "more efficient"? Do you have an issue with the way
StdProp works internally, or with the
As some may have seen on news.gnome.org or freshmeat, version 0.93 of Dia
is now officially out there. Nothing different from 0.93-pre3 (except
some translations, I think), but if you're of the kind who doesn't like
prereleases, go to http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/gnome/sources/dia/0.93 and get
the new
Link on web page http://www.gnome.org/projects/dia/downld.html
for version 0.93 is incorrect. (specifies 92 in path).
thanks,
Jon
--
___
Jon A. Solworth
Computer Science Dept. (M/C 15
On Wed, 2004-05-05 at 16:02, Jon A. Solworth wrote:
> Link on web page http://www.gnome.org/projects/dia/downld.html
> for version 0.93 is incorrect. (specifies 92 in path).
Indeed. Thanks for the tip-off!
-Lars
___
Dia-list mailing list
[EMAIL P
On Sat, 2004-04-24 at 02:42, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Just joined the list because I've been doing a little bit of HACKING
> on dia, so thought I would mention what I am working on as well as
> submitting a patch for one of the things.
>
> I'm working on creating a BPMN sheet (htt
On Sat, 2004-03-20 at 18:55, W. Borgert wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 20, 2004 at 07:02:08PM +0100, Lars Clausen wrote:
> > Starting work towards 0.93, the first prerelease is out today. Please
> > download it at ftp://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/sources/dia/0.93/ and try
> > it out. Report bugs to bugzilla a
On Tue, 2004-03-30 at 19:45, Kelley, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> This link doesn't work.
>
> http://www.lysator.liu.se/~alla/dia/
>
> Download Sources
> The latest bleeding edge version can be found in the Gnome CVS tree.
>
> http://cvs.gnome.org/bonsai/rview.cgi?cvsroot=/cvs/gnome&dir=dia
>
>
On Sun, 2004-05-02 at 17:14, Zhang Linbo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just notice a possible bug in 0.93-pre3,
> which can be illustrated by the following
> steps:
>
> 1. Open an arbitrary dialog.
>
> 2. Make some changes to the dialog.
>
> 3. Right click on the dialog, and select 'File->Save'
> to save
I'm having some really weird behavior with CVS which I can only ascribe
to there being multiple CVS servers for gnome.org?
Basically, I've got a checkout of the DIA_0_94_DEV branch checked out
yesterday by
% cvs -z3 -d :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvs/gnome co -r DIA_0_94_DEV dia
but when I run a
On Wed, 2004-05-05 at 22:30, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I'm having some really weird behavior with CVS which I can only ascribe
> to there being multiple CVS servers for gnome.org?
Yes, that must be why. I'm having no such problem with the non-anoncvs,
even though I cvs back and forth between two
14 matches
Mail list logo
