shape.dtd, diagram.dtd

I attach files which I think ara better than the ones in the distribution: present shape. dtd: doesnt mention the possibility of using text. (And there is a typo error for path). present diagram.dtd: does not say "dia:" before attribute names. I have an old dia-XML file without those "

Re: intltoolize: problem building CVS

Hmmm... since I'm running FreeBSD and using the ports collection the option of downgrading gettext isn't very practical. FreeBSD does however recognize the problem and provide a "gettext-old" port. I tried changing autogen.sh to use gettextize-old but am having the same problems. Still hacking

Re: shape.dtd, diagram.dtd

On Wed, 10 Jul 2002, Dolores Alia de Saravia wrote: > I attach files which I think ara better than the ones in the > distribution: > > present shape. dtd: doesnt mention the possibility of using text. (And > there is a typo error for path). > > present diagram.dtd: does not say "dia:" befo

Re: 0.90 problem

On Sat, 6 Jul 2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Hi > > I have built 0.90 from source on my slackware 8 box, the build went > without any errors. A check in config.log shows no errors. > > The problem is when I try and run it, it fails with the screen > fulls of warnings like these [...] An en

Re: PATCH: UML state changes

On Sat, 6 Jul 2002, Alejandro Aguilar Sierra wrote: > Hello: > > Sumary of changes in the format of a changelog (I did not edited the > changelog since this patch is against 0.90): > > 2002-07-06 Alejandro Aguilar Sierra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > * objects/UML/state.c: Removed old draw_roun

Re: Visible UML Comments

On Sat, 6 Jul 2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Fri, Jul 05, 2002 at 04:46:12PM -0500, Lars Clausen wrote: >> On Fri, 28 Jun 2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> > Hi! >> > >> >This patch contains code to handle comments in DIA UML >> > Diagrams. The layout is a bit broken (strange alignement

Re: patch: View->Redraw action

On Mon, 17 Jun 2002, Dimitris Vyzovitis wrote: > Hi, > > Attached is a patch to add a view->redraw action. This is useful for > cases that the diagram gets blurry from moving objects around. I was about to say that you could just do this via the window manager, but some window managers are unch

Re: shape.dtd, diagram.dtd

On 10 Jul 2002 21:14:01 -0500, "Lars Clausen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The dtds are not actually used by Dia, they are for informational > purposes. I didn't know that. Is it undesirable for Dia to use its DTD? I have this cockamamie idea that XLST will eventually to be the dia2world v

Re: PATCH: UML state changes

On 10 Jul 2002, Lars Clausen wrote: > I have committed the patch, with only a few changes: > > Uses dia_font_new_from_legacy_name instead of font_getfont. > > Uses fill_rounded_rect instead of fill_rect for the background of State. OK. Thanks. > Is there a reason why you're forcing the shapes t

Re: shape.dtd, diagram.dtd

On Wed, 10 Jul 2002, James K. Lowden wrote: > On 10 Jul 2002 21:14:01 -0500, "Lars Clausen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > >> The dtds are not actually used by Dia, they are for informational >> purposes. > > I didn't know that. Is it undesirable for Dia to use its DTD? I have no idea. It

Re: PATCH: UML state changes

On Wed, 10 Jul 2002, Alejandro Aguilar Sierra wrote: > On 10 Jul 2002, Lars Clausen wrote: > >> Is there a reason why you're forcing the shapes to be black and white >> instead of adding the default line color and fill color properties? > > Not really. I just didn't think that someone would wa

Re: shape.dtd, diagram.dtd

On 2002-07-10 at 23:36 -0500, Lars Clausen wrote: > >> The dtds are not actually used by Dia, they are for > >> informational purposes. > > > > I didn't know that. Is it undesirable for Dia to use its > > DTD? > > I have no idea. It just doesn't. I'm not sure what using > the DTD would do. Bu