Dia ChangeLog report for Tue Apr 30 07:23:01 2002 (UTC)

2002-04-30 Thread Dia ChangeLog Daemon
Snapshots available at http://www.crans.org/~chepelov/dia/snapshots *** Recent ChangeLog entries: --- ChangeLog.previous Sun Apr 28 09:23:12 2002 +++ dia-cvs-snapshot/ChangeLog Tue Apr 30 09:23:06 2002 @@ -1,3 +1,84 @@ +2002-04-29 Lars Clausen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> + + * lib/font.c: Supp

Can Dia run in 256 colours?

2002-04-30 Thread Jason Halls
Hi I want to run dia on terminal server clients. Unfortunately, the clients environment are fixed to 256 colours. Is there a way to get dia to work in 256? Jason ___ Dia-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/dia-li

Re: CVS and uncompressed Dia files? (RE: Is there a more stable version than 0.88.1?)

2002-04-30 Thread Ben A. Hetland
Lars Clausen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Another would be to ensure that objects are always > > written out in the same order. It would be a problem if > > a particular user option had the side effect of chaning > > this behavior. It would also be a problem if, when an > > existing object

Re: Is there a more stable version than 0.88.1? Bad default

2002-04-30 Thread Cyrille Chepelov
Le Mon, Apr 29, 2002, à 01:23:29PM -0500, Lars Clausen a écrit: > I guess Cyrille applied your patch. What patch ? -- Cyrille > Problem is, now a lot of diagrams have been made with POLYMORPHIC as > default. How can we tell what a missing entry is supposed to be? Are they > always exp

Re: Can Dia run in 256 colours?

2002-04-30 Thread Cyrille Chepelov
Le Tue, Apr 30, 2002, à 10:31:28AM +0100, Jason Halls a écrit: > I want to run dia on terminal server clients. Unfortunately, the clients > environment are fixed to 256 colours. > > Is there a way to get dia to work in 256? AFAIK, X runs very well even on black&white displays. I don't see why d

Re: Dia ChangeLog report for Tue Apr 30 07:23:01 2002 (UTC)

2002-04-30 Thread Cyrille Chepelov
Le Tue, Apr 30, 2002, à 09:24:23AM +0200, Dia ChangeLog Daemon a écrit: Hans, > + [ Instead of fixing about 70 occurances in 20 files > + where GTK_TALKS_UTF8_WE_DONT needed to be handled > + Dia on win32 from now on uses glib-2.0 and not > + only talks utf-8 with gtk-1.3 b

DiaCanvas widget

2002-04-30 Thread Pierre Pronchery
Hi, I'd like to know more about the DiaCanvas widget, but the link proposed on the Dia's website is dead. Can you point me to the place to find it? Thanks, Pierre ___ Dia-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/dia-li

Dia plugins and C++

2002-04-30 Thread Pierre Pronchery
Hi, I'm developping a Dia plugin for 2 weeks now, and I started in C. I may host it somewhere, but it's very specific and so not interesting to include directly in Dia project. Now I'd like to use C++, because I need to build and see special trees based on my plugin graphical language, and I wan

Re: Is there a more stable version than 0.88.1? Bad default

2002-04-30 Thread Lars Clausen
On Tue, 30 Apr 2002, Cyrille Chepelov wrote: > Le Mon, Apr 29, 2002, à 01:23:29PM -0500, Lars Clausen a écrit: >> I guess Cyrille applied your patch. > > What patch ? A patch to allow more than just virtual/non-virtual inheritance. The blame log has your name on it. -Lars -- Lars Clausen (

Re: Dia plugins and C++

2002-04-30 Thread Lars Clausen
On Tue, 30 Apr 2002, Pierre Pronchery wrote: > Hi, > > I'm developping a Dia plugin for 2 weeks now, and I started in C. > I may host it somewhere, but it's very specific and so not interesting > to include directly in Dia project. > > Now I'd like to use C++, because I need to build and see spe

Re: Is there a more stable version than 0.88.1? Bad default

2002-04-30 Thread Cyrille Chepelov
Le Tue, Apr 30, 2002, à 10:33:57AM -0500, Lars Clausen a écrit: > On Tue, 30 Apr 2002, Cyrille Chepelov wrote: > > Le Mon, Apr 29, 2002, à 01:23:29PM -0500, Lars Clausen a écrit: > >> I guess Cyrille applied your patch. > > > > What patch ? > > A patch to allow more than just virtual/non-virtual

Re: Dia plugins and C++

2002-04-30 Thread Cyrille Chepelov
Le Tue, Apr 30, 2002, à 10:35:38AM -0500, Lars Clausen a écrit: > On Tue, 30 Apr 2002, Pierre Pronchery wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'm developping a Dia plugin for 2 weeks now, and I started in C. > > I may host it somewhere, but it's very specific and so not interesting > > to include directly in Di

Re: Is there a more stable version than 0.88.1? Bad default

2002-04-30 Thread Lars Clausen
On Tue, 30 Apr 2002, Cyrille Chepelov wrote: > Le Tue, Apr 30, 2002, à 10:33:57AM -0500, Lars Clausen a écrit: >> On Tue, 30 Apr 2002, Cyrille Chepelov wrote: >> > Le Mon, Apr 29, 2002, à 01:23:29PM -0500, Lars Clausen a écrit: >> >> I guess Cyrille applied your patch. >> > >> > What patch ? >>

Re: Is there a more stable version than 0.88.1? Bad default

2002-04-30 Thread Cyrille Chepelov
Le Mon, Apr 29, 2002, à 07:30:17PM +0200, Matthieu Sozeau a écrit: > Oops. I did it ! this is just a bad default value given before getting the old >"abstract" attribute. This is just a matter of changing > + op->inheritance_type = UML_POLYMORPHIC; > - op->inheritance_type = UML_LEAF; > insid

Re: Is there a more stable version than 0.88.1? Bad default

2002-04-30 Thread Lars Clausen
On Tue, 30 Apr 2002, Cyrille Chepelov wrote: > Le Mon, Apr 29, 2002, à 07:30:17PM +0200, Matthieu Sozeau a écrit: > >> Oops. I did it ! this is just a bad default value given before getting >> the old "abstract" attribute. This is just a matter of changing >> + op->inheritance_type = UML_POLYM

Re: Is there a more stable version than 0.88.1? Bad default

2002-04-30 Thread Cyrille Chepelov
Le Tue, Apr 30, 2002, à 03:11:15PM -0500, Lars Clausen a écrit: > I think it is -- after the change was put in, all diagrams would be > explicit about the inheritance, and the diagrams before that had > non-virtual as the implicit default. I guess you applied it, then... (for a couple days, m

Re: Is there a more stable version than 0.88.1? Bad default

2002-04-30 Thread Matthieu Sozeau
Le 30 Apr 2002 15:11:15 -0500, Lars Clausen a écrit: >On Tue, 30 Apr 2002, Cyrille Chepelov wrote: >> Le Mon, Apr 29, 2002, à 07:30:17PM +0200, Matthieu Sozeau a écrit: >> >>> Oops. I did it ! this is just a bad default value given before getting >>> the old "abstract" attribute. This is just a

Re: Is there a more stable version than 0.88.1? Bad default

2002-04-30 Thread Cyrille Chepelov
Le Tue, Apr 30, 2002, à 10:55:04PM +0200, Matthieu Sozeau a écrit: > I confirm. This line's just before reading the old (deprecated) attribute for >inheritance. > > Cyrille, I'm sorry for your dinner! Well, I got only deprieved of doughnuts, that's almost fine ;-) -- Cyrille -- Grump

Re: Is there a more stable version than 0.88.1? Bad default

2002-04-30 Thread Lars Clausen
On Tue, 30 Apr 2002, Cyrille Chepelov wrote: > > Also, I'd like to announce that Julian Seward's valgrind has made it this > morning into sid ! I'll try to run a little more seriously dia under > valgrind, to see if I can manage to find problems... Cool. I've been trying to run njamd on Dia, bu

Re: Is there a more stable version than 0.88.1? Bad default

2002-04-30 Thread Cyrille Chepelov
Le Tue, Apr 30, 2002, à 04:10:50PM -0500, Lars Clausen a écrit: > On Tue, 30 Apr 2002, Cyrille Chepelov wrote: > > > > Also, I'd like to announce that Julian Seward's valgrind has made it this > > morning into sid ! I'll try to run a little more seriously dia under > > valgrind, to see if I can m

RE: Can Dia run in 256 colours?

2002-04-30 Thread Young, Robert
> Jason Halls wrote: > I want to run dia on terminal server clients. Unfortunately, > the clients > environment are fixed to 256 colours. > > Is there a way to get dia to work in 256? Is this under Win32 or Unix?? If Win32 then the 256 colour problem is a known limitation: the latest GTK+ port

Re: Review of Keybindings [Re: Dia's user interface]

2002-04-30 Thread Lars Clausen
On Thu, 25 Apr 2002, James K. Lowden wrote: > On 23 Apr 2002 14:33:23 -0500 "Lars Clausen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: [...] > Preference Rot > > After reading some of the earlier comments and Joel's book > > (http://www.joelonsoftware.com/uibook/chapters/fog57.html) > > I looked at Di