Dia ChangeLog report for Sat Jan 5 08:23:01 2002 (UTC)

2002-01-05 Thread Dia ChangeLog Daemon
Snapshots available at http://www.crans.org/~chepelov/dia/snapshots *** Recent ChangeLog entries: --- ChangeLog.previous Fri Jan 4 09:23:16 2002 +++ dia-cvs-snapshot/ChangeLog Sat Jan 5 09:23:12 2002 @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +2002-01-04 Cyrille Chepelov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> + + Patch from Mar

Gnome 2.0

2002-01-05 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Guys, I was wondering; what version of Gtk+ the latest Dia is tracking, and whether you guys have forked for Gnome 2.0 ? and if so when you hope to have a full port. Thanks, Michael. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot _

Re: Gnome 2.0

2002-01-05 Thread Cyrille Chepelov
Le sam, jan 05, 2002, à 10:01:42 +, Michael Meeks a écrit: > Hi Guys, > > I was wondering; what version of Gtk+ the latest Dia is tracking, and 1.2.10 > whether you guys have forked for Gnome 2.0 ? and if so when you hope to no. > have a full port. We don't have the manpower, I don't

Re: Gnome 2.0

2002-01-05 Thread Arjan J. Molenaar
On Sat, 2002-01-05 at 11:58, Cyrille Chepelov wrote: > Le sam, jan 05, 2002, à 10:01:42 +, Michael Meeks a écrit: > > Hi Guys, > > > > I was wondering; what version of Gtk+ the latest Dia is tracking, and > > 1.2.10 > > > whether you guys have forked for Gnome 2.0 ? and if so when you h

Re: Gnome 2.0

2002-01-05 Thread Cyrille Chepelov
Le sam, jan 05, 2002, à 01:42:55 +0100, Arjan J. Molenaar a écrit: > I've checked out the latest DIA from CVS today. I can come up with some > sort of porting plan (which includes DiaCanvas2). I think I should focus > on the following things: > - Moving out display code out and putting DiaCanvas

RE: Struggling with CVS version of dia

2002-01-05 Thread Rob Campbell
I had to search the archive to find out what you were talking about. I only scan messages on printing, since I never print my diagrams. I came across the link in another post months ago, not this one. I check it periodically but always assume there have been no changes since there are no announ

TeX output for UML diagrams [path]

2002-01-05 Thread Ruslan Shevchenko
Diar dia-rs : 0. Thanks for dia ;). 1. Small problem with printing UML diagram in TeX: TeX special symbols in names (such as #) are not escaped, as result TeX output are not compiled by TeX. So, I attach patch against dia-0.88.1 2. Are anybody know: what can cause invisability of some words in

Re: TeX output for UML diagrams [path]

2002-01-05 Thread Cyrille Chepelov
Le dim, jan 06, 2002, à 12:34:53 +0200, Ruslan Shevchenko a écrit: > 1. Small problem with printing UML diagram in TeX: TeX special symbols > in names (such as #) are not escaped, as result TeX output > are not compiled by TeX. > So, I attach patch against dia-0.88.1 thanks for the patch ! It l