Ok folks, the moment you have all been waiting for is here. Ok, the
moment some of you have been waiting for. UrShapes is now in cvs at
cvs.con-struct.sourceforge.net/con-struct in module
dia-0.88.1_urshape_fork. I tried to create a patch and for some reason
the resulting patch wouldn't patch
When I try to ./autogen.sh the newest CVS, I get the following from
autoheader:
FATAL ERROR: Autoconf version 2.50 or higher is required for this script
Now debian unstable autoconf (including autoheader) is only at 2.13, so
where did this come from? Still configures fine, though.
-Lars
--
On 01 Aug 2001, Lars Clausen wrote:
>
> When I try to ./autogen.sh the newest CVS, I get the following from
> autoheader:
>
> FATAL ERROR: Autoconf version 2.50 or higher is required for this script
>
> Now debian unstable autoconf (including autoheader) is only at 2.13, so
> where did this co
Le mer, aoû 01, 2001, à 07:45:41 -0500, Lars Clausen a écrit:
>
> When I try to ./autogen.sh the newest CVS, I get the following from
> autoheader:
>
> FATAL ERROR: Autoconf version 2.50 or higher is required for this script
So it works. Good ! :-)
> Now debian unstable autoconf (including aut
On Thu, 2 Aug 2001, Cyrille Chepelov wrote:
> Le mer, aoû 01, 2001, à 07:45:41 -0500, Lars Clausen a écrit:
>>
>> When I try to ./autogen.sh the newest CVS, I get the following from
>> autoheader:
>>
>> FATAL ERROR: Autoconf version 2.50 or higher is required for this script
>
> So it works. G
Le mer, aoû 01, 2001, à 08:31:17 -0500, Lars Clausen a écrit:
>
> Which AC_PUSH? I find it nowhere in the dia sources.
AC_LANG_PUSH in configure.in, actually. [SEE BELOW, IN FACT]
>
> Ok, a apt-get update found the new version, and it works.
>
> > The (debian package) maintainer of autoconf
On Thu, 2 Aug 2001, Cyrille Chepelov wrote:
> Le mer, aoû 01, 2001, à 08:31:17 -0500, Lars Clausen a écrit:
>
[...]
> Not talking for the RPM side, of which I'm pretty much ignorant (out of
> lack of necessity).
Me too, but I still don't want to have them go through hoops to compile.
Incidental
Le mer, aoû 01, 2001, à 09:06:33 -0500, Lars Clausen a écrit:
> Well, it takes some time to get through to testing.
yup; but you've mentioned unstable, haven't you ? (anyway, the problem seems
to be whole on non-i386 arches).
> True. I hope this won't be until 2.50 is more commonly available.
On Thu, 2 Aug 2001, Cyrille Chepelov wrote:
> Le mer, aoû 01, 2001, à 07:45:41 -0500, Lars Clausen a écrit:
> >
> > When I try to ./autogen.sh the newest CVS, I get the following from
> > autoheader:
> >
> > FATAL ERROR: Autoconf version 2.50 or higher is required for this script
>
> So it works.
