Re: UrShape definition Part IV: Full header (?)

2001-07-03 Thread Andre Kloss
Hi again. John, you raised some points I dislike, so here's what I think: > > How can UrShapes interact? If a UrShape is dragged over a (free) > > UrContainer, it should snap into it until dragged out again. Any > > UrContainer that has means of containing another UrShape should resize > > to mak

Re: GTK+ 2.0 widget for dia

2001-07-03 Thread Arjan Molenaar
> Hi all. > > I've just read one mail about the dia port to gtk+2.0 and later, gnome > 2. > I have taken over the dia-newcanvas widget that was initiated by james > henstridge. The widget is under developement but can be usefull > for dia. Hi, I've been working on a split-off of the dia-newcanv

Re: Syntax error while compiling from CVS?

2001-07-03 Thread Dolores Alia de Saravia
> Le lun, jui 02, 2001, à 11:47:29 -0300, Dolores Alia de Saravia a écrit: > > I have not been able to compile from CVS; after installing automake 1.4, > > autoconf 2.50 (>2.13), libtool 1.4, GNU gettext 0.10.38, and doing > > several other things, I continue getting error message

Re: SGV-sgv, ...not svg? sure?

2001-07-03 Thread Dolores Alia de Saravia
> Hi, there. > > Is it really sgv? I have queried www.w3.org, but only found a > "http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"; namespace, which is the one of Scaleable > Vector Graphics. Could it be a typo? > > cu Andre > -- > Tolerance rulez, everything else sux! -- Andre Kloss > Sorry. I agree with you.

Re: UrShape definition Part IV: Full header (?)

2001-07-03 Thread Lars Clausen
On Tue, 3 Jul 2001, Andre Kloss wrote: > Hi again. John, you raised some points I dislike, so here's what I > think: > >> > How can UrShapes interact? If a UrShape is dragged over a (free) >> > UrContainer, it should snap into it until dragged out again. Any >> > UrContainer that has means of co

Re: Shapes, resizable or not?

2001-07-03 Thread Dolores Alia de Saravia
On June 1, Jamin Collins wrote: > I recently upgraded to Dia v0.88.1. I now seem to be having some difficulty > with the Chapin shapes that I've been creating. I don't recall having this > problem under v0.86 with relatively the same (changed SVG namespace as > suggested) shape definitions.

Re: UrShape definition Part IV: Full header (?)

2001-07-03 Thread John Palmieri
Hehe. Well lets see if I can clarify what I was thinking. Andre Kloss wrote: > Hi again. John, you raised some points I dislike, so here's what I > think: > > > > How can UrShapes interact? If a UrShape is dragged over a (free) > > > UrContainer, it should snap into it until dragged out again.

Re: SGV-sgv, ...not svg? sure?

2001-07-03 Thread James K. Lowden
Dolores Alia de Saravia wrote: > Sorry. I agree with you. > It is > http://www.w3.org/2000/svg; > what I wanted to say is that NEWS file proposed > http://www.w3.org/2000/SVG > which is incorrect. Dolores, I don't think it's really "incorrect". The W3C says that case "shouldn't" matter

Resizing is not what manual says?

2001-07-03 Thread Dolores Alia de Saravia
I have just compiled Dia from CVS. I keep thinking Dia is great and it is also great to have access to the manual from inside Dia. But I beleive that what manual says about resizing is not always true: For example, try loading "Document" from the FlowChart sheet and then try to resize it (not

Re: UrShape Layout controversy

2001-07-03 Thread Andre Kloss
Hi, folks. Let's pull the pieces together: Lars writes: > There's a thing you will have to consider at some point (though > maybe not yet): If you have an UrContainer A with an UrContainer > B within it, how do you add further UrShapes to A? a) Every UrContainer needs to have some border, at l

Re: UrShape Layout controversy

2001-07-03 Thread Lars Clausen
On Tue, 3 Jul 2001, Andre Kloss wrote: > Hi, folks. > > Let's pull the pieces together: > > Lars writes: >> There's a thing you will have to consider at some point (though >> maybe not yet): If you have an UrContainer A with an UrContainer >> B within it, how do you add further UrShapes to A?

Re: SGV-sgv, ...not svg? sure?

2001-07-03 Thread Dolores Alia de Saravia
> Dolores Alia de Saravia wrote: > > > Sorry. I agree with you. > > It is > > http://www.w3.org/2000/svg; > > what I wanted to say is that NEWS file proposed > > http://www.w3.org/2000/SVG > > which is incorrect. > Extracted from what James K. Lowden wrote, on july 10. > Dolores, >

Re: UrShape Layout controversy

2001-07-03 Thread John Palmieri
Andre Kloss wrote: > Hi, folks. > > Let's pull the pieces together: > > Lars writes: > > > You will also need a way to get UrShapes out of UrContainers. > That a UrShape snaps to a UrContainer doesn't mean it can't be dragged > out of it anymore. Now I see what Chapin Charts are. Very nice.

Re: GTK+ 2.0 widget for dia

2001-07-03 Thread Arjan Molenaar
> Hi all. > > I've just read one mail about the dia port to gtk+2.0 and later, gnome > 2. > I have taken over the dia-newcanvas widget that was initiated by james > henstridge. The widget is under developement but can be usefull > for dia. Hi, I've been working on a split-off of the dia-newcanv

Gtk-CRITICAL **

2001-07-03 Thread Fabio
>> Gtk-CRITICAL **: file gtkcontainer.c: line 713 (gtk_container_add): assertion >`widget != NULL' failed. This is the error I get when I try to run dia 0.88.1. During the compilation, a lot of warnings appear: nlist.c: In function `nlist_update_row': nlist.c:209: warning: implicit declaration

Re: SGV-sgv, ...not svg? sure?

2001-07-03 Thread James Henstridge
On Tue, 3 Jul 2001, Dolores Alia de Saravia wrote: > James: > > Now you say it, I also agree with you. But then, instead of correcting > the NEWS file, may be Dia itself should be corrected: > > I beleive that > > if an user designs a .shape file and writes ". /SVG" instead of > "/svg",

UrShape Layout: Controversy convergence

2001-07-03 Thread Andre Kloss
Ok. Let's see, what comes out at l(e)ast: 1. The normal UrContainer does no drag'n'drop, a special Ur-Dragndrop-Container shall do this. The behaviour of a "normal" UrContainer remains undefined. How do you want to embed a UrShape in a UrContainer? By some yet undefined function? How will the use

Re: Syntax error while compiling from CVS?

2001-07-03 Thread Cyrille Chepelov
Le mar, jui 03, 2001, à 09:20:37 -0300, Dolores Alia de Saravia a écrit: > > > > Le lun, jui 02, 2001, à 11:47:29 -0300, Dolores Alia de Saravia a > écrit: > > > I have not been able to compile from CVS; after installing automake > 1.4, > > > autoconf 2.50 (>2.13), libtool 1.4, GNU gette