Re: dia gui

2001-06-17 Thread Cyrille Chepelov
Le dim, jun 17, 2001, à 12:36:46 +0200, Jeroen Zwartepoorte a écrit: > A side question: why different builds for GTK+ & Gnome? Two reasons: 1) not everyone wants to bring in the whole GNOME baggage. 2) the Win32 port can't bring the whole GNOME baggage anyway (IIRC). > I'm relatively new to Gno

Bug in network cloud

2001-06-17 Thread Sebastian Fischmeister
Hello. There is a bug in the network cloud. 1). insert a network cloud in a figure 2). put a lot of returns in there (no other text) 3). save the figure 4). open the figure 5). save the figure now you've got the network cloud with one newline less. You can repeat 4 and 5 until there's nothin

Re: Scaling in LaTeX

2001-06-17 Thread Jacek Pliszka
On 15 Jun 2001, Benoit Pelletier wrote: > I tried both and it works. I was a bit surprised that #1 worked, I > thought \include was like concatenating the file at the point of > insertion. It turns out that we should use \input instead. Right. \include is not a simple \input. > The problem I

Re: Bug in network cloud

2001-06-17 Thread Cyrille Chepelov
Le dim, jun 17, 2001, à 08:32:38 +0200, Sebastian Fischmeister a écrit: > Hello. > > There is a bug in the network cloud. > > 1). insert a network cloud in a figure > 2). put a lot of returns in there (no other text) > 3). save the figure > > 4). open the figure > 5). save the figure > > now

Re: Shapes layout proposal

2001-06-17 Thread James K. Lowden
Cyrille, James, Lars, Lennon, John, Andre, all One of the difficulties faced by anyone approaching a new project is understanding its technical design. In need of a top-down document that says "Here is the problem, here's how we went about attacking it, here're the pieces and how they behave", o

Re: Shapes layout proposal

2001-06-17 Thread John Palmieri
Ok well I'm just going to comment on the points I have some knowledge on. Comments are inline: "James K. Lowden" wrote: > Recap > > > There is some controversy over just how far the generic Shape property & behavior can > be carried. As James said, "hand coding a property dialog for a few shape

Re: dia2shape

2001-06-17 Thread Cyrille Chepelov
Le dim, jun 17, 2001, à 10:41:24 +, James K. Lowden a écrit: > It seems to me it should be possible to use Dia to create Dia shapes. [snip] > Does anyone think this is infeasible? Worthwhile? infeasible, certainly not. In fact, dia already has a shape export plug-in, which isn't bad for p

Re: dia2shape

2001-06-17 Thread James Henstridge
On Mon, 18 Jun 2001, Cyrille Chepelov wrote: > Le dim, jun 17, 2001, à 10:41:24 +, James K. Lowden a écrit: > > > It seems to me it should be possible to use Dia to create Dia shapes. > > [snip] > > > Does anyone think this is infeasible? Worthwhile? > > infeasible, certainly not. In fact, d

dia2shape

2001-06-17 Thread James K. Lowden
All, The whole shape proposal discussion led me to another notion I don't recall having seen discussed. It seems to me it should be possible to use Dia to create Dia shapes. What needed is enough information in a Dia diagram to create a .shape file, and an XSLT file that describes the transform