*** Recent ChangeLog entries:
--- ChangeLog.previous Sat Jun 9 09:23:05 2001
+++ dia/ChangeLog Sat Jun 9 17:54:47 2001
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+2001-06-09 Cyrille Chepelov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
+
+ * app/app_procs.c (app_init): added a call to
+ bind_textdomain_codeset() so that gett
Le dim, jun 10, 2001, à 10:40:23 +0800, James Henstridge a écrit:
> I don't think it is as simple as a simple sed job. The xml-i18n-tools
> package needs knowledge of each format it supports. It would not be
> difficult to add support, but it has to be done.
It _is_. xml-i18n-tools works with
On Sun, 10 Jun 2001, Cyrille Chepelov wrote:
> Le dim, jun 10, 2001, à 10:40:23 +0800, James Henstridge a écrit:
>
> > I don't think it is as simple as a simple sed job. The xml-i18n-tools
> > package needs knowledge of each format it supports. It would not be
> > difficult to add support, but
On Sun, 10 Jun 2001, Cyrille Chepelov wrote:
> In short, the plan could be the following:
>
> - ASAP: 0.89-rc1 (from the current CVS)
> - ASAP+few days: 0.89 proper (everything's perfect, isn't it ?)
> - for 0.90: string handling audit ; xml-i18n-tools ; actual removal
>
Le dim, jun 10, 2001, à 07:27:50 +0800, James Henstridge a écrit:
> Okay. So we would just have to change things like
> blah blah blah
> to:
> <_description>blah blah blah
>
> xml-i18n-merge then removes the underscores and adds extra lines with the
> correct xml:lang attribute. We don't n
Le dim, jun 10, 2001, à 08:44:59 -0500, Lars Clausen a écrit:
> I would add one thing, most likely to 0.90, namely optional use of the
> freetype library. While there are other areas where I have "wouldn't it be
> neat" ideas, fonts is a "this currently sucks" area. Though it is very
> quiet ab
On Sun, 10 Jun 2001, Cyrille Chepelov wrote:
> Le dim, jun 10, 2001, à 08:44:59 -0500, Lars Clausen a écrit:
>
>> I would add one thing, most likely to 0.90, namely optional use of the
>> freetype library. While there are other areas where I have "wouldn't it
>> be neat" ideas, fonts is a "this
On Sun, 10 Jun 2001, Cyrille Chepelov wrote:
> Ah ? xml-i18n-merge looks up the .po files for translations and merges them
> back into the resulting XML file ? Nice: we don't even have to modify the
> code we have, then. That is Good(tm).
Sounds like it would be a good idea to switch over then.
Le lun, jun 11, 2001, à 02:29:14 +0800, James Henstridge a écrit:
> On Sun, 10 Jun 2001, Cyrille Chepelov wrote:
>
> > Ah ? xml-i18n-merge looks up the .po files for translations and merges them
> > back into the resulting XML file ? Nice: we don't even have to modify the
> > code we have, then.
