On Tue, 29 May 2012 05:19:41 -0700, Edzo A. Botjes
wrote:
... it gives the warning that the target file is going to be "29.3MB"
It means RAM, not disk.
Giving a warning is good :), but when I look at the file size then it is
a bit smaller. 445 KB
Oh, yes, but when you open it back in y
Greetings, Edzo A . Botjes!
> is it not so that the .dia file is full of text? thus that the compression
> with a given factor can be predicted?
Dia file is a text, unless you embed a ton of binary data.
But.
> or otherwise put. how often is the "maybe" value the real value?
> Because the differ
mm but if I am correct there is no images or other non compressible data in
the .dia file.
is it not so that the .dia file is full of text? thus that the compression
with a given factor can be predicted?
or otherwise put. how often is the "maybe" value the real value?
Because the difference is pre
At 29.05.2012 14:19, Edzo A. Botjes wrote:
Dear L.S.
When using DIA I came to the next behaviour.
When I choose in "page setup" for "scaling" of 200.
And then I go to "File" -> "Export" and choose the PNG extension
it gives the warning that the target file is going to be "29.3MB"
Sorry, it is
Dear L.S.
When using DIA I came to the next behaviour.
When I choose in "page setup" for "scaling" of 200.
And then I go to "File" -> "Export" and choose the PNG extension
it gives the warning that the target file is going to be "29.3MB"
Giving a warning is good :), but when I look at the file si
