Hi Liel,
Many thanks for your email, I think you might have too new versions of the
packages :-)
I have searched for the missing `GBool` type and it seems to have been
removed from poppler about a month ago:
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/poppler/poppler/commit/163420b48bdddf9084208b3cadf04dafad5
Hi,
I'm trying to build Dia from the master branch on Arch Linux (latest
packages to date). It gives me multiple errors in pdf-import.cpp (a
complete output log of make is attached in the HTML file).
make all-recursive
make[1]: Entering directory '/home/liel/Projects/C/dia'
Making all in lib
make[
I found the package list noted here, [
http://dia-installer.de/howto/compile_msvc/index.html.en#ubuntu, ](
http://dia-installer.de/howto/compile_msvc/index.html.en#ubuntu, ) out of date
for this version of Unbuntu.
Here's what I found worked for me,
sudo apt-get install autoconf automake au
Hi Hans,
Thanks.
My version choice was based on:
https://wiki.gnome.org/Apps/Dia/Download
Latest stable release
Version 0.97.2 is now available. ...
First you should get an up-to-date version, for stable use
> git clone git://git.gnome.org/dia
> and
> git checkout -b dia-0-97 -
Am 11.09.2014 um 19:21 schrieb George Georgalis:
resending without strace output... build is successful but the binary
fails...
Reading your log and modification I woudn't say the build was successful.
The main problem seems to be that you are using an outdated source package
of Dia. But see b
Hi,
feel free do look at the Debian source package; in short:
./configure --help
./configure [...] --with-hardbooks
make
:-)
HTH,
Roland
On 06/29/2010 05:12 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> I downloaded and built dia from the tar.gz file and it works
> beautifully. One question. How do you build th
I downloaded and built dia from the tar.gz file and it works
beautifully. One question. How do you build the html files? All the
tarball has is xml files. 'make html' does nothing (but errors on the
po subdirectory).
I was able to download the html files one by one from
http://dia-installer.d
Hi,
just an idea: is there anybody on the list who has the openSUSE
buildfarm creating Ubuntu packages
of the Dia SVN version? This might save Kevin a lot of time.
Regards,
Steffen
> You will need to google a little bit to know which ubuntu package contains
> the missing libraries.
THere are a couple of packages you need to install. I guess gmodule and gobject
are in the glib-dev ubuntu package (libglib2.0-dev, I think - it containts the
development files for glib - headers and such).
There are other packages you need, watch for output like
No package 'gmodule-2.0' found
I'm trying to follow up on Steffen's suggestion to build dia 0.97 from
SVN to correct the problem I experienced with the UML Properties window.
I got these errors after downloading from svn and trying to compile:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/dia-0.97/dia$ ./autogen.sh
Running gettextize...
./autogen.sh: 63
Lars Clausen wrote:
> Todd Chambery sagde:
>
>> Tim,
>>
>> Thanks for the suggestion. I tried it with one of my completed
>> drawings, and it's a reasonable workaround. The problem, of course: if
>> the diagram is modified, the "definitions" layer is not wired to the
>> widgets on the layer u
ram is modified, the "definitions" layer is not wired to the
>> widgets on the layer underneath, and things have to be reworked.
>>
>> I have some programming experience, is there a "fast track" document for
>> building dia? I'd like to take
Todd Chambery sagde:
> Tim,
>
> Thanks for the suggestion. I tried it with one of my completed
> drawings, and it's a reasonable workaround. The problem, of course: if
> the diagram is modified, the "definitions" layer is not wired to the
> widgets on the layer underneath, and things have to be
wired to the
> widgets on the layer underneath, and things have to be reworked.
>
> I have some programming experience, is there a "fast track" document for
> building dia? I'd like to take a look and see if I could maybe hack
> something in.
[...]
Dia is following t
d.
I have some programming experience, is there a "fast track" document for
building dia? I'd like to take a look and see if I could maybe hack
something in.
Todd
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Todd Chambery wrote:
>
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'm sure y
The use of Makefile variable DATADIR collides with a datatype in w32api:
/usr/include/w32api/objidl.h:58
typedef OLECHAR **SNB;
typedef enum tagDATADIR {
DATADIR_GET=1,
DATADIR_SET
} DATADIR;
Could DIA be adapted to use DIA_DATADIR (like DIA_SHEETDIR)?
(And while you're at it, LIBDIR
On 17 Nov 2003, mike crowe wrote:
> While attempting to build an installation kit for dia 0.92,
> using the command:
>
> rpmbuild -ta dia-0.92.tar.gz
>
> I received the error message below, which was the last thing
> printed:
>
> RPM build errors:
> File not found:
> /var/tmp/dia-0.92-root/usr/shar
While attempting to build an installation kit for dia 0.92,
using the command:
rpmbuild -ta dia-0.92.tar.gz
I received the error message below, which was the last thing
printed:
RPM build errors:
File not found:
/var/tmp/dia-0.92-root/usr/share/gnome/apps/Applications/dia.desktop
Indeed, t
On Fri, 15 Nov 2002, Alan Horkan wrote:
>
>> fscked up). I wouldn't recommend it for production use, or even for
>> casual tests.
>
> My bad.
> mea culpa.
>
> i really should get my own stuff together before trying to encourage
> others to work on Dia but hey, i'm an opportunist.
Hey, encourag
> fscked up). I wouldn't recommend it for production use, or even for casual
> tests.
My bad.
mea culpa.
i really should get my own stuff together before trying to encourage
others to work on Dia but hey, i'm an opportunist.
Later
Alan
___
Dia-list
On Fri, 15 Nov 2002, Alan Horkan wrote:
>
> Advice, if you are the kind of person who builds from source then
> building from CVS head is probably a better bet. Not that i have tried,
> but it is GTK2 and has a load of font stuff sorted out and it is better
> for us all that those who are willing
Advice, if you are the kind of person who builds from source then building
from CVS head is probably a better bet. Not that i have tried, but it is
GTK2 and has a load of font stuff sorted out and it is better for us all
that those who are willing to compile from source look at the latest and
gre
I am trying to build dia-0.90 under RedHat 7.2 and it is failing at the
step where it creates the documentation.
Here is the excerpt which shows the failure:
make install-data-hook
make[4]: Entering directory `/usr/src/redhat/BUILD/dia-0.90/doc/en'
cd . && /usr/bin/db2html -V '%use-id-as-filena
On Thu, 12 Sep 2002, Cyrille Chepelov wrote:
> Le Thu, Sep 12, 2002, à 10:53:38AM -0700, Mike Charnoky a écrit:
>> I've been having problems with flowchart box resizing and noticed that
>> this was fixed a few days ago. I'd like to rebuild dia with this fix.
>> Should I download the .90 sources a
Le Thu, Sep 12, 2002, à 10:53:38AM -0700, Mike Charnoky a écrit:
> I've been having problems with flowchart box resizing and noticed that
> this was fixed a few days ago. I'd like to rebuild dia with this fix.
> Should I download the .90 sources and apply the patch? How stable is the
> latest sn
On Thu, 12 Sep 2002, Mike Charnoky wrote:
> Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2002 10:53:38 -0700 (PDT)
> From: Mike Charnoky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: building dia
>
> I've been having problems with flowchart box resi
I've been having problems with flowchart box resizing and noticed that
this was fixed a few days ago. I'd like to rebuild dia with this fix.
Should I download the .90 sources and apply the patch? How stable is the
latest snapshot? Am I correct to assume that dia is undergoing some
drastic chang
27 matches
Mail list logo
