Re: [OT] Re: anchoring end points to objects

2001-05-24 Thread James Henstridge
On Thu, 24 May 2001, D. Stimits wrote: > But a big argument for adding JPEG export is that some browsers don't > work correctly with PNG. Regardless of whether a PNG or JPEG is used, it > would be nice to see high quality Dia snapshots with anti-aliasing. Well, we are accepting patches :) In th

Re: [OT] Re: anchoring end points to objects

2001-05-24 Thread D. Stimits
Ross Burton wrote: > > On 23 May 2001 21:36:12 -0600, D. Stimits wrote: > > James Henstridge wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, 23 May 2001, D. Stimits wrote: > > > > > > > Despite being named "portable", PNG is not as well supported for many > > > > readers/viewers as is jpeg. Jpeg quality is also not n

[OT] Re: anchoring end points to objects

2001-05-24 Thread Ross Burton
On 23 May 2001 21:36:12 -0600, D. Stimits wrote: > James Henstridge wrote: > > > > On Wed, 23 May 2001, D. Stimits wrote: > > > > > Despite being named "portable", PNG is not as well supported for many > > > readers/viewers as is jpeg. Jpeg quality is also not necessarily worse, > > > it has a c

Re: anchoring end points to objects

2001-05-23 Thread James Henstridge
On Thu, 24 May 2001, James Henstridge wrote: > On Wed, 23 May 2001, D. Stimits wrote: > > > Despite being named "portable", PNG is not as well supported for many > > readers/viewers as is jpeg. Jpeg quality is also not necessarily worse, > > it has a controllable "lossy" compression, which can be

Re: anchoring end points to objects

2001-05-23 Thread D. Stimits
James Henstridge wrote: > > On Wed, 23 May 2001, D. Stimits wrote: > > > Despite being named "portable", PNG is not as well supported for many > > readers/viewers as is jpeg. Jpeg quality is also not necessarily worse, > > it has a controllable "lossy" compression, which can be turned off > > M

Re: anchoring end points to objects

2001-05-23 Thread James Henstridge
On Wed, 23 May 2001, D. Stimits wrote: > Despite being named "portable", PNG is not as well supported for many > readers/viewers as is jpeg. Jpeg quality is also not necessarily worse, > it has a controllable "lossy" compression, which can be turned off Maybe JPEG 2000 supports lossless compress

Re: anchoring end points to objects

2001-05-23 Thread D. Stimits
James Henstridge wrote: > > On Tue, 22 May 2001, Hubert Figuiere wrote: > > > According to D. Stimits <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > I'm also wondering how hard it would be to create jpeg's as an export > > > option? > > > > > > I think if I'm not mistaken, that libart can do this easily. > > Th

Re: anchoring end points to objects

2001-05-22 Thread James Henstridge
On Tue, 22 May 2001, Hubert Figuiere wrote: > According to D. Stimits <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > I'm also wondering how hard it would be to create jpeg's as an export > > option? > > > I think if I'm not mistaken, that libart can do this easily. > The best is IMHO to file bug a report on http://b

Re: anchoring end points to objects

2001-05-22 Thread Hubert Figuiere
According to D. Stimits <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I'm also wondering how hard it would be to create jpeg's as an export > option? I think if I'm not mistaken, that libart can do this easily. The best is IMHO to file bug a report on http://bugzilla.gnome.org for this. Hub __

anchoring end points to objects

2001-05-22 Thread D. Stimits
In general it is very easy to take a line or similar object with end points and drop it onto an anchor of some other object, like a rectangle's corner or edge center, such that moving the other object causes the line to track its end point. There are cases where I'd like to anchor the end point of