On mar, 2002-08-27 at 16:03, Tim Ellis wrote:
> Hubert Figuiere Escrit:
> > AFAIK, the ImageMagick support for PDF, PS and EPS is done thru
> > GhostScript. So why using ImageMagick convert instead of ps2pdf which is
> > a GhostScript utility ?
>
> The ImageMagick manpage (which is quite extensiv
Hubert Figuiere Escrit:
> AFAIK, the ImageMagick support for PDF, PS and EPS is done thru
> GhostScript. So why using ImageMagick convert instead of ps2pdf which is
> a GhostScript utility ?
The ImageMagick manpage (which is quite extensive) makes no mention of
GhostScript. Do you know something
On lun, 2002-08-26 at 20:44, Tim Ellis wrote:
> > Personally I'd
> > suggest that if PDF output were to be added, that dia put it
> > through ps2pdf or something instead of doing it itself. Mind
> > you, I've never found any PS to PDF converter entirely
> > satisfactory.
>
> I guess I've found Im
> Personally I'd
> suggest that if PDF output were to be added, that dia put it
> through ps2pdf or something instead of doing it itself. Mind
> you, I've never found any PS to PDF converter entirely
> satisfactory.
I guess I've found ImageMagick to be less than entirely satisfactory, too,
but it
