At 16.06.2012 13:01, vwf wrote:
[...]
Thank you for looking into it. Loading my handwritten shape, exporting
it from dia, and comparing the two is a good technique. I fixed the
shape-file, but this does not solve the big problem
The real problem is in testshape.svg: Linux loads it, Wind
I heared from someone that libsvg uses gtkgpix or something, with was not
available on windows.
IRC #inkscape@freenode:
2012-06-10.log:09:19 su_v: afaiu Inkscape currently uses gdk-pixbuf (librsvg module)
for such 'SVG'
2012-06-10.log:09:20 su_v: that's also why linking SVG files via tag
f
On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 11:18:18AM +0200, Hans Breuer wrote:
>
> Am 16.06.2012 um 07:56 schrieb vwf:
>
> Usual response would be: please include your problematic shape file for
> analysis,
> but I've got it off-list. It appears handwritten instead of being based on an
> original
> shape export
Am 16.06.2012 um 07:56 schrieb vwf:
> On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 10:19:20PM +0200, Hans Breuer wrote:
>> Did you now switch to 0.97.2 on Linux, too? Or do you still need to
>> read
>> https://mail.gnome.org/archives/dia-list/2012-June/msg00013.html ?
> Switched
>
>> AFAICT there is no portability i
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 10:19:20PM +0200, Hans Breuer wrote:
> Did you now switch to 0.97.2 on Linux, too? Or do you still need to
> read
> https://mail.gnome.org/archives/dia-list/2012-June/msg00013.html ?
Switched
> AFAICT there is no portability issue for shapes between Linux and
> Windows vers
At 15.06.2012 07:26, vwf wrote:
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 09:35:41PM +0200, Hans Breuer wrote:
Should work as well - except if your svg is too complicate for Dia
to render. The subset of SVG supported by Dia directly (for shapes
and import) is comparatively small to the subset supported by
librsvg
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 09:35:41PM +0200, Hans Breuer wrote:
> Should work as well - except if your svg is too complicate for Dia
> to render. The subset of SVG supported by Dia directly (for shapes
> and import) is comparatively small to the subset supported by
> librsvg.
What I do not understand
At 11.06.2012 11:33, Killian De Volder wrote:
Any comments on the:
"2 possible solution: fix the render engine,
Not sure which engine you are talking about, but maybe it's
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=328165
But you can influence the resolution of the bitmap already with the
curr
Any comments on the:
"2 possible solution: fix the render engine, or write some code that extract the SVG
data (from multiple files) and cram it the shape file." part ?
Regards,Killian
Greetings, Killian De Volder!
Sorry for top posting. I'm not very used to mailing lists-etiquettes (don't
he
Greetings, Killian De Volder!
> Sorry for top posting. I'm not very used to mailing lists-etiquettes (don't
> hesitate to slap me on the wrist).
Sure, here you are:
> Yes.
>> Really?
>>> Because it breaks natural flow of reading.
Why top-posting is bad?
(I shamelessly took this piece of b
Sorry for top posting. I'm not very used to mailing lists-etiquettes (don't
hesitate to slap me on the wrist).
By combining several images bases, and icons, I can easily generate a more
complete set of icons without loosing my sanity (especially when I need to fix
1 base icon) :)
Now I got it
Hi,
let me start by asserting, that IMHO top-posting makes it
harder to lead productive discussion. But no matter...
On Sat, 09 Jun 2012 22:40:50 +0200, Killian De Volder wrote:
> I think there was a mixup.
> I meant the thinks like Cisco,UML,SyBase, Flowchart, ...
> Or did you indeed mean that
On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 09:34:53AM +0200, Killian De Volder wrote:
> BTW what is wrong with this:
>
probably...
___
dia-list mailing list
dia-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/dia-list
FAQ at http://live.gnome.org/Dia/Faq
M
Ok it's working now ... However it's creating at 32px bitmap ...
Any way around this ?
BTW what is wrong with this:
http://www.w3.org/2000/svg";
xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink";>
Test2
Test2.png
I think there was a mixup.
I meant the thinks like Cisco,UML,SyBase, Flowc
A the invalid URL |xmlns="http://www.daa.com.au/~james/dia-shape-ns"; is
mandatory ...|
On 10-06-12 09:34, Killian De Volder wrote:
BTW what is wrong with this:
http://www.w3.org/2000/svg";
xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink";>
Test2
Test2.png
I think there was a mixup.
I m
BTW what is wrong with this:
http://www.w3.org/2000/svg";
xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink";>
Test2
Test2.png
I think there was a mixup.
I meant the thinks like Cisco,UML,SyBase, Flowchart, ...
Or did you indeed mean that ?
On 09-06-12 22:21, To
I think there was a mixup.
I meant the thinks like Cisco,UML,SyBase, Flowchart, ...
Or did you indeed mean that ?
On 09-06-12 22:21, Tomas Pospisek wrote:
On Sat, 09 Jun 2012 13:35:15 +0200, Killian De Volder wrote:
A recurring issue for me is lack of icons.
Search a bit on the Internet, but I'
On Sat, 09 Jun 2012 13:35:15 +0200, Killian De Volder wrote:
>
> A recurring issue for me is lack of icons.
> Search a bit on the Internet, but I'm unable to find a set that has a
> focus on providing IT related icons.
>
> I'm considering starting a project using simple icons, that are easily
> at
Hello,
A recurring issue for me is lack of icons.
Search a bit on the Internet, but I'm unable to find a set that has a focus on
providing IT related icons.
I'm considering starting a project using simple icons, that are easily
attributable by all.
(Still working out a good looking, yet easy
19 matches
Mail list logo
