At 24.01.2013 02:37, Jeremy S wrote:
Hi,
(my first post here: I _like_ Dia... a lot!)
I'm looking to use the dynamic 'tree' shape/object in a plumbing schematic but
would welcome a bit more control over its properties. At the moment the only
configurable property is the line colour, and I'd lik
Le 24/01/2013 02:34, Jeremy S a écrit :
Hi,
(my first post here: I _like_ Dia... a lot!)
I'm looking to use the dynamic 'tree' shape/object in a plumbing
schematic but would welcome a bit more control over its properties. At
the moment the only configurable property is the line colour, and I'
If you need to get on with it, you can always get nice looking images by
making a screen dump (ctrl-Print Screen in Picasa), cropping it down, and
saving as a jpg.
Sorry, I can't actually help you with the problem itself. Hopefully,
someone else will chime in.
M
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 11:58 AM
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 04:58:44PM +, Chris Damien wrote:
> I am using Dia to create flow chart diagrams for an important work
> project. It has been working fine, but I have one major problem. After
> exporting my finished diagram as a pdf, all the line widths that I set
> seem to reset in thi
I am using Dia to create flow chart diagrams for an important work project. It
has been working fine, but I have one major problem. After exporting my
finished diagram as a pdf, all the line widths that I set seem to reset in
thickness. Even when I set all line widths to 0.00 and the font size,
vwf,
There is probably an interesting technical reason why line ends can
automatically co-locate (usually a limitation in gtk+, statistically, but I
think every Dia user wishes for it.
I am used to lines having a snap to grip at each end with CAD sketchers.
M
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 7:21 AM, v
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 08:43:53AM -0500, Michael Ross wrote:
> Hi vwf,
>
> You can place the connection point shape (from the Electric sheet) and
> change its size to be large or smaller than the line itself, but you can't
> have many of them and change their size wholesale (there is probably a
>
