Greetings, Killian De Volder!
> Sorry for top posting. I'm not very used to mailing lists-etiquettes (don't
> hesitate to slap me on the wrist).
Sure, here you are:
> Yes.
>> Really?
>>> Because it breaks natural flow of reading.
Why top-posting is bad?
(I shamelessly took this piece of b
Sorry for top posting. I'm not very used to mailing lists-etiquettes (don't
hesitate to slap me on the wrist).
By combining several images bases, and icons, I can easily generate a more
complete set of icons without loosing my sanity (especially when I need to fix
1 base icon) :)
Now I got it
Hi,
let me start by asserting, that IMHO top-posting makes it
harder to lead productive discussion. But no matter...
On Sat, 09 Jun 2012 22:40:50 +0200, Killian De Volder wrote:
> I think there was a mixup.
> I meant the thinks like Cisco,UML,SyBase, Flowchart, ...
> Or did you indeed mean that
On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 09:34:53AM +0200, Killian De Volder wrote:
> BTW what is wrong with this:
>
probably...
___
dia-list mailing list
dia-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/dia-list
FAQ at http://live.gnome.org/Dia/Faq
M
Ok it's working now ... However it's creating at 32px bitmap ...
Any way around this ?
BTW what is wrong with this:
http://www.w3.org/2000/svg";
xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink";>
Test2
Test2.png
I think there was a mixup.
I meant the thinks like Cisco,UML,SyBase, Flowc
A the invalid URL |xmlns="http://www.daa.com.au/~james/dia-shape-ns"; is
mandatory ...|
On 10-06-12 09:34, Killian De Volder wrote:
BTW what is wrong with this:
http://www.w3.org/2000/svg";
xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink";>
Test2
Test2.png
I think there was a mixup.
I m
BTW what is wrong with this:
http://www.w3.org/2000/svg";
xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink";>
Test2
Test2.png
I think there was a mixup.
I meant the thinks like Cisco,UML,SyBase, Flowchart, ...
Or did you indeed mean that ?
On 09-06-12 22:21, To
